California 1995-1996 Regular Session Status: Introduced

SB 435 — Overseas trade offices: India.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 1995-1996 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

In plain language

The bill establishes overseas trade offices in India to promote trade.

SB 435 aims to create trade offices in India to support and expand international trade. These offices will help connect local businesses with Indian markets.

What this means for you
  • Workers: Workers may benefit from increased job opportunities as businesses expand internationally.
  • Small Business: This means small businesses may find it easier to access new markets in India.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The new version of Bill SB 435 has added a specific provision to clarify its purpose, while removing some outdated information that was no longer relevant. This change helps ensure that the bill is easier to understand and apply. By making this update, lawmakers can better address the issues the bill aims to solve, making it more effective in the long run.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)

Sponsors

  • Davis · Cosponsor
  • Ducheny · Cosponsor
  • Alquist · Cosponsor
  • Solis · Cosponsor
  • Costa · Cosponsor
  • Hughes · Cosponsor
  • O'Connell · Cosponsor
  • Watson · Cosponsor
  • Figueroa · Cosponsor
  • Gallegos · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 112 not signed on

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (10)

  • Davis
  • Ducheny
  • Alquist
  • Solis
  • Costa
  • Hughes
  • O'Connell
  • Watson
  • Figueroa
  • Gallegos

Not signed on (112)

112 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 112 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 435?
SB 435 is sponsored by Davis, Ducheny, Alquist, Solis, Costa, Hughes, O'Connell, Watson, Figueroa, and Gallegos.
What is the current status of SB 435?
This bill died with 1995-1996 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 435?
Track SB 435 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 435

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 435

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →