AN ACT CONCERNING STRENGTHENING LAWS CONCERNING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 7299 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 7299.
You're tracking HB 7299
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 7299 — AN ACT CONCERNING STRENGTHENING LAWS CONCERNING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
14 added · 19 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended bill makes several changes including clarifying the standard of fear for stalking by removing the requirement that it must be in the victim's circumstances. It also specifies that conduct causing fear about a person's employment must be done intentionally and for no legitimate purpose. Additionally, it includes the act of suffocation in the definition of strangulation offenses. Lastly, the requirement to include the applicant's affidavit when forwarding restraining orders to law enforcement has been removed. These changes may affect how stalking and strangulation cases are assessed and prosecuted.
General Assembly RaisedSubstitute Bill No.
7299 January Session, 2017 LCO*_____HB07299JUD___040617____* No.AN ACT CONCERNING STRENGTHENING LAWS CONCERNING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
5497 *05497_______JUD* Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
(JUD) AN ACT CONCERNING STRENGTHENING LAWS CONCERNING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
(1) Such person knowingly engages in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person [to] in the victim's circumstances to (A) fear for such person's physical safety or the physical safety of a third person, or (B) suffer substantial emotional distress;
or (2) Such person intentionally, and for no legitimate purpose, engages in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person in the victim's circumstances to fear that such person's employment, business or career is threatened, where (A) such conduct consists of the actor telephoning to, appearing at or initiating communication or contact at such other person's place of employment or business, provided the actor was previously and clearly informed to cease such conduct, and (B) such conduct does not consist of constitutionally protected activity.
(a) A person is guilty of stalking in the third degree when [he] such person recklessly causes another person in the victim's circumstances to reasonably (1) fear for his or her physical safety, or (2) suffer substantial emotional distress, as defined in section 53a-181d, as amended by this act, by wilfully and repeatedly following or lying in wait for such other person.
Section 53a-64aa of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2017):
(a) A person is guilty of strangulation or suffocation in the first degree when such person commits strangulation or suffocation in the second degree as provided in section 53a-64bb, as amended by this act, and (1) in the commission of such offense, such person (A) uses or attempts to use a dangerous instrument, or (B) causes serious physical injury to such other person, or (2) such person has previously been convicted of a violation of this section or section 53a-64bb, as amended by this act.
(b) No person shall be found guilty of strangulation or suffocation in the first degree and unlawful restraint or assault upon the same incident, but such person may be charged and prosecuted for all three offenses upon the same information.
For the purposes of this section, "unlawful restraint" means a violation of section 53a-95 or 53a-96, and "assault" means a violation of section 53a-59, 53a-59a, 53a-59b, 53a-59c, 53a-60, 53a-60a, 53a-60b, 53a-60c, 53a-61 or 53a-61a.
(c) Strangulation or suffocation in the first degree is a class C felony.
Sec.
4.
4.5.
5.
Subsection (h) of section 46b-15 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2017):
(h) (1) The applicant shall cause notice of the hearing pursuant to subsection (b) of this section and a copy of the application and the applicant's affidavit and of any ex parte order issued pursuant to subsection (b) of this section to be served on the respondent not less than three days before the hearing.
The cost of such service shall be paid for by the Judicial Branch.
(2) When (A) an application indicates that a respondent holds a permit to carry a pistol or revolver, an eligibility certificate for a pistol or revolver, a long gun eligibility certificate or an ammunition certificate or possesses one or more firearms or ammunition, and (B) the court has issued an ex parte order pursuant to this section, the proper officer responsible for executing service shall, whenever possible, provide in-hand service and, prior to serving such order, shall (i) provide notice to the law enforcement agency for the town in which the respondent will be served concerning when and where the service will take place, and (ii) send, or cause to be sent by facsimile or other means, a copy of the application, [the applicant's affidavit,] the ex parte order and the notice of hearing to such law enforcement agency, and (iii) request that a police officer from the law enforcement agency for the town in which the respondent will be served be present when service is executed by the proper officer.
Upon receiving a request from a proper officer under the provisions of this subdivision, the law enforcement agency for the town in which the respondent will be served may designate a police officer to be present when service is executed by the proper officer.
(3) Upon the granting of an ex parte order, the clerk of the court shall provide two copies of the order to the applicant.
Upon the granting of an order after notice and hearing, the clerk of the court shall provide two copies of the order to the applicant and a copy to the respondent.
Every order of the court made in accordance with this section after notice and hearing shall be accompanied by a notification that is consistent with the full faith and credit provisions set forth in 18 USC 2265(a), as amended from time to time.
Immediately after making service on the respondent, the proper officer shall (A) send or cause to be sent, by facsimile or other means, a copy of the application, or the information contained in such application, stating the date and time the respondent was served, to the law enforcement agency or agencies for the town in which the applicant resides, the town in which the applicant is employed and the town in which the respondent resides, and (B) as soon as possible, but not later than two hours after the time that service is executed, input into the Judicial Branch's Internet-based service tracking system the date, time and method of service.
If, prior to the date of the scheduled hearing, service has not been executed, the proper officer shall input into such service tracking system that service was unsuccessful.
The clerk of the court shall send, by facsimile or other means, a copy of any ex parte order and of any order after notice and hearing, or the information contained in any such order, to the law enforcement agency or agencies for the town in which the applicant resides, the town in which the applicant is employed and the town in which the respondent resides, within forty-eight hours of the issuance of such order.
If the victim is enrolled in a public or private elementary or secondary school, including a technical high school, or an institution of higher education, as defined in section 10a-55, the clerk of the court shall, upon the request of the victim, send, by facsimile or other means, a copy of such ex parte order or of any order after notice and hearing, or the information contained in any such order, to such school or institution of higher education, the president of any institution of higher education at which the victim is enrolled and the special police force established pursuant to section 10a-156b, if any, at the institution of higher education at which the victim is enrolled.
Sec.
3 October 1, 2017 53a-64bb53a-64aa Sec.
4 October 1, 2017 53a-64cc53a-64bb Sec.
5 October 1, 2017 46b-15(h)53a-64cc Sec.
8 October 1, 2017 54-91a StatementJUD ofJoint Purpose:Favorable Subst.
To change the standard of fear required for the stalking statutes, include suffocation in the strangulation statutes, delete the requirement that the contents of a restraining order forwarded to law enforcement include the applicant's affidavit, amend the violations of conditions of release statute to provide for an enhanced penalty and amend presentence investigation statutes to prohibit the waiver of such investigation in the case of a family violence crime.
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]
View plain text versions (2)
- R01 html
- R00 Current html
Action History
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
PUBLIC ACT 17-31
-
ON CONSENT CALENDAR /IN CONCURRENCE
-
SEN. PASSED, HO. AMEND. SCH. A
-
SEN. ADOPTED HO. AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 759
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 451
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
HOUSE PASSED, HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE ADOPTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 692
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 452
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDER
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/24/17
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0324
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
Sponsors
- Patricia Billie' b'Miller · Primary
- Livvy R.' b'Floren · Primary
- Derek' b'Slap · Primary
- Stephen G.' b'Harding · Primary
- Sam' b'Belsito · Primary
- Joseph C.' b'Serra · Primary
- Emmett D.' b'Riley · Primary
- Doug' b'Dubitsky · Primary
- Michael' b'Ferguson · Primary
- Linda M.' b'Gentile · Primary
- William A.' b'Petit · Primary
- Prasad' b'Srinivasan · Primary
- Bruce V.' b'Morris · Primary
- John' b'Fusco · Primary
- John H.' b'Frey · Primary
- Robert C.' b'Sampson · Primary
- Gail' b'Lavielle · Primary
- Mike' b'France · Primary
- Kathleen M.' b'McCarty · Primary
- Devin R.' b'Carney · Primary
- Gary' b'Byron · Primary
- John K.' b'Hampton · Primary
- George S.' b'Logan · Primary
- Pam' b'Staneski · Primary
- Joe' b'Polletta · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →25 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 162 not signed on
Sponsors (25)
- b'Miller, Patricia Billie'
- b'Floren, Livvy R.'
- b'Slap, Derek'
- b'Harding, Stephen G.'
- b'Belsito, Sam'
- b'Serra, Joseph C.'
- b'Riley, Emmett D.'
- b'Dubitsky, Doug'
- b'Ferguson, Michael'
- b'Gentile, Linda M.'
- b'Petit, William A.'
- b'Srinivasan, Prasad'
- b'Morris, Bruce V.'
- b'Fusco, John'
- b'Frey, John H.'
- b'Sampson, Robert C.'
- b'Lavielle, Gail'
- b'France, Mike'
- b'McCarty, Kathleen M.'
- b'Carney, Devin R.'
- b'Byron, Gary'
- b'Hampton, John K.'
- b'Logan, George S.'
- b'Staneski, Pam'
- b'Polletta, Joe'
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (162)
162 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 162 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL M. FORMICA | — | Yea |
| TIM LARSON | — | Yea |
| KEVIN KELLY | — | Yea |
| STEVE CASSANO | — | Yea |
| MARILYN MOORE | — | Yea |
| BETH BYE | — | Yea |
| EDWIN A. GOMES | — | Yea |
| TERRY B. GERRATANA | — | Yea |
| MICHAEL A. MCLACHLAN | — | Yea |
| KEVIN D. WITKOS | — | Yea |
| TONI BOUCHER | — | Yea |
| PAUL DOYLE | — | Yea |
| CARLO LEONE | — | Yea |
| CRAIG MINER | — | Yea |
| LEN SUZIO | — | Yea |
| GAYLE SLOSSBERG | — | Yea |
| ART LINARES | — | Yea |
| JOE MARKLEY | — | Yea |
| LEONARD FASANO | — | Yea |
| GEORGE LOGAN | — | Yea |
| ANTHONY GUGLIELMO | — | Yea |
| L. SCOTT FRANTZ | — | Yea |
| Bob Duff | Democratic | Yea |
| Catherine A. Osten | Democratic | Yea |
| Douglas McCrory | Democratic | Yea |
| Gary A. Winfield | Democratic | Yea |
| Joan V. Hartley | Democratic | Yea |
| John W. Fonfara | Democratic | Yea |
| Mae Flexer | Democratic | Yea |
| Martin M. Looney | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric C. Berthel | Republican | Yea |
| Heather S. Somers | Republican | Yea |
| Henri Martin | Republican | Yea |
| John A. Kissel | Republican | Yea |
| Kathy Kennedy | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Hwang | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 7299?
- HB 7299 is sponsored by b'Miller, Patricia Billie', b'Floren, Livvy R.', b'Slap, Derek', b'Harding, Stephen G.', b'Belsito, Sam', b'Serra, Joseph C.', b'Riley, Emmett D.', b'Dubitsky, Doug', b'Ferguson, Michael', b'Gentile, Linda M.', b'Petit, William A.', b'Srinivasan, Prasad', b'Morris, Bruce V.', b'Fusco, John', b'Frey, John H.', b'Sampson, Robert C.', b'Lavielle, Gail', b'France, Mike', b'McCarty, Kathleen M.', b'Carney, Devin R.', b'Byron, Gary', b'Hampton, John K.', b'Logan, George S.', b'Staneski, Pam', and b'Polletta, Joe'.
- What is the current status of HB 7299?
- This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 7299?
- Track HB 7299 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 7299
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 7299
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →