AN ACT CONCERNING SECURITY OFFICER LICENSES.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 846 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 846.
You're tracking SB 846
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 846 — AN ACT CONCERNING SECURITY OFFICER LICENSES.
Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
5 added · 10 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 846 modifies the application process for a security officer license. It now requires applicants to submit two full-face photographs and clarifies that they must provide their fingerprints as part of the application, while also specifying that applicants with a training waiver are exempt from the licensing fee. Additionally, the license will now be valid for an extended period of ninety days after its expiration date, unless revoked or under suspension. These changes aim to streamline the application process and clarify the requirements applicants must meet.
General Assembly RaisedSubstitute Bill No.
846 January Session, 2017 LCO*_____SB00846PS____030917____* No.AN ACT CONCERNING SECURITY OFFICER LICENSES.
3997 *03997_______PS_* Referred to Committee on PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY Introduced by:
(PS) AN ACT CONCERNING SECURITY OFFICER LICENSES.
[Applicants] Each applicant shall submit with [their] the application two sets of [their][their fingerprints and] his or her fingerprints on forms specified and furnished by the commissioner, [and] two full-face photographs, [of them,] two inches wide by two inches high, taken not earlier than six months prior to the date of application, and a one-hundred-dollar licensing fee, made payable to the state.
[Applicants] AnAny applicant who received a waiver as provided in subsection (b) of this section shall be exempt from payment of such licensing fee.
SuchThe licensecommissioner shall besend valid for a periodnotice of ninetythe daysexpiration afterdate itsof expirationsuch datelicense unlessto the licenseholder hasof beensuch revokedlicense, orby isfirst underclass suspensionmail, pursuantnot toless sectionthan 29-161v.ninety days before such expiration, and shall enclose with such notice an application for renewal.
The security officer license shall be valid for a period of ninety days after its expiration date unless the license has been revoked or is under suspension pursuant to section 29-161v.
Section 1 October 1, 2017 29-161q(c) StatementPS ofJoint Purpose:Favorable Subst.
To extend the validity of a security officer license by ninety days unless such license has been revoked or is under suspension.
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]
View plain text versions (2)
- R01 html
- R00 Current html
Action History
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
PUBLIC ACT 17-11
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
HOUSE PASSED
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 441
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDER
-
SENATE PASSED
-
FILE NO. 207
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 139
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/22/17
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0221
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Public Safety and Security
Sponsors
- Joseph C.' b'Serra · Primary
- Terry B.' b'Adams · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 185 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- b'Serra, Joseph C.'
- b'Adams, Terry B.'
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (185)
185 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 185 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL M. FORMICA | — | Yea |
| TIM LARSON | — | Yea |
| KEVIN KELLY | — | Yea |
| STEVE CASSANO | — | Yea |
| MARILYN MOORE | — | Yea |
| BETH BYE | — | Yea |
| EDWIN A. GOMES | — | Yea |
| TERRY B. GERRATANA | — | Yea |
| MICHAEL A. MCLACHLAN | — | Yea |
| KEVIN D. WITKOS | — | Yea |
| TONI BOUCHER | — | Yea |
| PAUL DOYLE | — | Yea |
| CARLO LEONE | — | Yea |
| CRAIG MINER | — | Yea |
| LEN SUZIO | — | Yea |
| GAYLE SLOSSBERG | — | Yea |
| ART LINARES | — | Yea |
| JOE MARKLEY | — | Yea |
| LEONARD FASANO | — | Yea |
| GEORGE LOGAN | — | Yea |
| ANTHONY GUGLIELMO | — | Yea |
| HEATHER BOND | — | Yea |
| L. SCOTT FRANTZ | — | Yea |
| Bob Duff | Democratic | Yea |
| Catherine A. Osten | Democratic | Yea |
| Douglas McCrory | Democratic | Yea |
| Gary A. Winfield | Democratic | Yea |
| Joan V. Hartley | Democratic | Yea |
| John W. Fonfara | Democratic | Yea |
| Mae Flexer | Democratic | Yea |
| Martin M. Looney | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric C. Berthel | Republican | Yea |
| Henri Martin | Republican | Yea |
| John A. Kissel | Republican | Yea |
| Kathy Kennedy | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Hwang | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 846?
- SB 846 is sponsored by b'Serra, Joseph C.' and b'Adams, Terry B.'.
- What is the current status of SB 846?
- This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 846?
- Track SB 846 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 846
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 846
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →