AN ACT CONCERNING A GRANDPARENT'S RIGHT TO VISITATION WITH HIS OR HER GRANDCHILD.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 7244 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 7244.
You're tracking HB 7244
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 7244 — AN ACT CONCERNING A GRANDPARENT'S RIGHT TO VISITATION WITH HIS OR HER GRANDCHILD.
Last action — SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 594
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
12 added · 17 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated bill modifies the criteria under which a grandparent may seek visitation rights with a minor child. It now clarifies that “real and significant harm” requires the minor to be neglected or uncared for and specifies that a grandparent's petition must demonstrate that the child's parents or guardians are unreasonably denying visitation. Additionally, the court can consider the history of contact between the grandparent and the child when determining whether a parent-like relationship exists and must evaluate the impact of any domestic violence on the minor. These changes aim to provide clearer guidelines for courts in making visitation determinations.
General Assembly RaisedSubstitute Bill No.
7244 January Session, 2017 LCO*_____HB07244JUD___040717____* No.AN ACT CONCERNING A GRANDPARENT'S RIGHT TO VISITATION WITH HIS OR HER GRANDCHILD.
4890 *04890_______JUD* Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
(JUD) AN ACT CONCERNING A GRANDPARENT'S RIGHT TO VISITATION WITH HIS OR HER GRANDCHILD.
(a) As used in this section,section: [:
and (2) "Real and significant harm"] "real and significant harm" means that the minor child is neglected, as defined in section 46b-120, or uncared for, as defined in said section.
(b) Any person,person other than a grandparent, as defined in section 2 of this act, may submit a verified petition to the Superior Court for the right of visitation with any minor child.child, [.
Such petition] except that if a verified petition shallhas includebeen specificfiled andby good-faitha allegationsgrandparent thatand (1) aeither parent-likeor relationshipboth existsparents betweenof the personminor andchild are deceased, (2) the parents of the minor child,child are divorced, or (3) the parents of the minor child are living separate and (2)apart denialin different habitats, the verified petition for the right of visitation wouldshall causebe realdetermined andin significantaccordance harm.with the provisions of section 2 of this act.
SubjectA toverified subsectionpetition [(e)]submitted (d)under of this section,section the court shall grantinclude thespecific right of visitation with any minor child to any person if the court finds after hearing and bygood-faith clearallegations andthat convincing[(1)] evidence(A) that a parent-like relationship exists between the person and the minor childchild, and [(2)] (B) denial of visitation would cause real and significant harm.
Subject to subsection (e) of this section, the court shall grant the right of visitation with any minor child to any person if the court finds after hearing and by clear and convincing evidence that a parent-like relationship exists between the person and the minor child and denial of visitation would cause real and significant harm.
[(d)(d) In determining whether a parent-like relationship exists between a grandparent seeking visitation pursuant to this section and a minor child, the Superior Court may consider, in addition to the factors enumerated in subsection (c) of this section, the history of regular contact and proof of a close and substantial relationship between the grandparent and the minor child.]child. [(e)] (d) If the Superior Court grants the right of visitation pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, the court shall set forth the terms and conditions of visitation including, but not limited to, the schedule of visitation, including the dates or days, time and place or places in which the visitation can occur, whether overnight visitation will be allowed and any other terms and conditions that the court determines are in the best interest of the minor child, provided such conditions shall not be contingent upon any order of financial support by the court.
(e) If the Superior Court grants the right of visitation pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, the court shall set forth the terms and conditions of visitation including, but not limited to, the schedule of visitation, including the dates or days, time and place or places in which the visitation can occur, whether overnight visitation will be allowed and any other terms and conditions that the court determines are in the best interest of the minor child, provided such conditions shall not be contingent upon any order of financial support by the court.
In determining the terms and conditions of visitation, the court may consider (1) the effect that such visitation will have on the relationship between the parents or guardians of the minor child and the minor child, and (2) the effect on the minor child of any domestic violence that has occurred between or among the parents, [grandparents,]grandparents, persons seeking visitation and the minor child.
[(f)](f) (e) Visitation rights granted in accordance with this section shall not be deemed to have created parental rights in the person or persons to whom such visitation rights are granted, nor shall such visitation rights be a ground for preventing the relocation of the custodial parent.
[(g)](g) (f) Upon motion, the court may order the payment of fees for another party, the attorney for the minor child, the guardian ad litem, or any expert by any party in accordance with such party's financial ability.
(b) Any grandparent may submit a verified petition under this section to the Superior Court for the right of visitation with anya minor child.child, as described in subdivision (1) of subsection (a) of this section, when (1) either or both parents of the minor child are deceased, (2) the parents of the minor child are divorced, or (3) the parents of the minor child are living separate and apart in different habitats.
(1)(A) The child's parents or guardians are unreasonably depriving the grandparent of the opportunity to visit with the minor child;
(2)(B) awarding the grandparent visitation will not interfere with the relationship between the minor child and the parents or guardians;
and (3)(C) (A)(i) the minor child's parents or guardians are unfit, or (B)(ii) there are compelling circumstances to overcome the presumption that the decision by the parents or guardians to deny the grandparent visitation is in the best interest of the minor child.child, provided any determination by the court as to the best interest of the minor child shall be made utilizing Judicial Branch resources and at no cost to the parties.
2 October 1, 2017 New section StatementJUD ofJoint Purpose:Favorable Subst.
To allow a grandparent the right of visitation with a minor child upon demonstrating to the court that clear and convincing circumstances support the granting of such visitation.
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]
View plain text versions (2)
- R01 html
- R00 Current html
Action History
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 594
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
TRANSMITTED PURSUANT TO JOINT RULE 17
-
HOUSE PASSED
-
FILE NO. 702
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 458
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDER
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/24/17
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0313
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
Sponsors
- Patricia Billie' b'Miller · Primary
- Kevin C.' b'Kelly · Primary
- Rosa C.' b'Rebimbas · Primary
- Christine' b'Conley · Primary
- Brandon L.' b'McGee · Primary
- Scott A.' b'Storms · Primary
- Hilda E.' b'Santiago · Primary
- Catherine F.' b'Abercrombie · Primary
- Terry B.' b'Adams · Primary
- Laura M.' b'Devlin · Primary
- Robert' b'Sanchez · Primary
- Michael A.' b'DiMassa · Primary
- Dorinda' b'Borer · Primary
- Linda A.' b'Orange · Primary
- Themis' b'Klarides · Primary
- Joan V.' b'Hartley · Primary
- Robyn A.' b'Porter · Primary
- Tami' b'Zawistowski · Primary
- Lonnie' b'Reed · Primary
- Linda M.' b'Gentile · Primary
- Steven J.' b'Stafstrom · Primary
- William A.' b'Petit · Primary
- Christopher' b'Rosario · Primary
- Fred' b'Wilms · Primary
- Whit' b'Betts · Primary
- Brenda L.' b'Kupchick · Primary
- Cristin' b'McCarthy Vahey · Primary
- Kim' b'Rose · Primary
- Peter A.' b'Tercyak · Primary
- Noreen S.' b'Kokoruda · Primary
- Richard A.' b'Smith · Primary
- Geraldo C.' b'Reyes · Primary
- Charles J.' b'Ferraro · Primary
- Melissa H.' b'Ziobron · Primary
- Gail' b'Lavielle · Primary
- Mike' b'France · Primary
- Edwin' b'Vargas · Primary
- Tony' b'Hwang · Primary
- Brian M.' b'Ohler · Primary
- Kathleen M.' b'McCarty · Primary
- Josh' b'Elliott · Primary
- Jeffrey J.' b'Berger · Primary
- John K.' b'Hampton · Primary
- Minnie' b'Gonzalez · Primary
- Angel' b'Arce · Primary
- Anthony J." b"D'Amelio · Primary
- Marilyn V.' b'Moore · Primary
- Bill' b'Buckbee · Primary
- Michelle L.' b'Cook · Primary
- Stephanie E.' b'Cummings · Primary
- Kevin' b'Ryan · Primary
- Holly H.' b'Cheeseman · Primary
- Robin' b'Green · Primary
- David T.' b'Wilson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →54 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 133 not signed on
Sponsors (54)
- b'Miller, Patricia Billie'
- b'Kelly, Kevin C.'
- b'Rebimbas, Rosa C.'
- b'Conley, Christine'
- b'McGee, Brandon L.'
- b'Storms, Scott A.'
- b'Santiago, Hilda E.'
- b'Abercrombie, Catherine F.'
- b'Adams, Terry B.'
- b'Devlin, Laura M.'
- b'Sanchez, Robert'
- b'DiMassa, Michael A.'
- b'Borer, Dorinda'
- b'Orange, Linda A.'
- b'Klarides, Themis'
- b'Hartley, Joan V.'
- b'Porter, Robyn A.'
- b'Zawistowski, Tami'
- b'Reed, Lonnie'
- b'Gentile, Linda M.'
- b'Stafstrom, Steven J.'
- b'Petit, William A.'
- b'Rosario, Christopher'
- b'Wilms, Fred'
- b'Betts, Whit'
- b'Kupchick, Brenda L.'
- b'McCarthy Vahey, Cristin'
- b'Rose, Kim'
- b'Tercyak, Peter A.'
- b'Kokoruda, Noreen S.'
- b'Smith, Richard A.'
- b'Reyes, Geraldo C.'
- b'Ferraro, Charles J.'
- b'Ziobron, Melissa H.'
- b'Lavielle, Gail'
- b'France, Mike'
- b'Vargas, Edwin'
- b'Hwang, Tony'
- b'Ohler, Brian M.'
- b'McCarty, Kathleen M.'
- b'Elliott, Josh'
- b'Berger, Jeffrey J.'
- b'Hampton, John K.'
- b'Gonzalez, Minnie'
- b'Arce, Angel'
- b"D'Amelio, Anthony J."
- b'Moore, Marilyn V.'
- b'Buckbee, Bill'
- b'Cook, Michelle L.'
- b'Cummings, Stephanie E.'
- b'Ryan, Kevin'
- b'Cheeseman, Holly H.'
- b'Green, Robin'
- b'Wilson, David T.'
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (133)
133 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 133 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 7244?
- HB 7244 is sponsored by b'Miller, Patricia Billie', b'Kelly, Kevin C.', b'Rebimbas, Rosa C.', b'Conley, Christine', b'McGee, Brandon L.', b'Storms, Scott A.', b'Santiago, Hilda E.', b'Abercrombie, Catherine F.', b'Adams, Terry B.', b'Devlin, Laura M.', b'Sanchez, Robert', b'DiMassa, Michael A.', b'Borer, Dorinda', b'Orange, Linda A.', b'Klarides, Themis', b'Hartley, Joan V.', b'Porter, Robyn A.', b'Zawistowski, Tami', b'Reed, Lonnie', b'Gentile, Linda M.', b'Stafstrom, Steven J.', b'Petit, William A.', b'Rosario, Christopher', b'Wilms, Fred', b'Betts, Whit', b'Kupchick, Brenda L.', b'McCarthy Vahey, Cristin', b'Rose, Kim', b'Tercyak, Peter A.', b'Kokoruda, Noreen S.', b'Smith, Richard A.', b'Reyes, Geraldo C.', b'Ferraro, Charles J.', b'Ziobron, Melissa H.', b'Lavielle, Gail', b'France, Mike', b'Vargas, Edwin', b'Hwang, Tony', b'Ohler, Brian M.', b'McCarty, Kathleen M.', b'Elliott, Josh', b'Berger, Jeffrey J.', b'Hampton, John K.', b'Gonzalez, Minnie', b'Arce, Angel', b"D'Amelio, Anthony J.", b'Moore, Marilyn V.', b'Buckbee, Bill', b'Cook, Michelle L.', b'Cummings, Stephanie E.', b'Ryan, Kevin', b'Cheeseman, Holly H.', b'Green, Robin', and b'Wilson, David T.'.
- What is the current status of HB 7244?
- This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 7244?
- Track HB 7244 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 7244
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 7244
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →