Connecticut 2017 Regular Session Status: Passed House

HJ 63 — RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 53 OF THE GENERAL STATUTES.

Last action — ON CONSENT CALENDAR /IN CONCURRENCE

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

33 added · 10 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to the bill clarify that the resolution confirms multiple decisions made by the Claims Commissioner regarding various claims against the state, and it now formally includes claims from several individuals and entities, not just Debra Cohen. This change consolidates affirmation for numerous dismissed claims, which may streamline the legislative process related to these claims.

→
Previous
Latest
RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER TO DISMISS THE CLAIM AGAINST THE STATE OF DEBRA COHEN.
RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 53 OF THE GENERAL STATUTES.
General Assembly   House Joint Resolution No.
General Assembly   Substitute House Joint Resolution No.
63 January Session, 2017   LCO No.
63 January Session, 2017   *_____HJ00063JUD___040317____* RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 53 OF THE GENERAL STATUTES.
3744   *03744_______JUD* Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY   Introduced by:
  (JUD)   RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER TO DISMISS THE CLAIM AGAINST THE STATE OF DEBRA COHEN.
Section 1.
Sec.
2.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23683 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of CWPM, LLC, is confirmed.
Sec.
3.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 22996 of said commissioner, ordering the denial of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Wesley Dorsey, is confirmed.
Sec.
4.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23296 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Andre Ford, is confirmed.
Sec.
5.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23125 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Rubin Jones, is confirmed.
Sec.
6.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24247 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Kevin Lindsay, is confirmed.
Sec.
7.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24263 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Neva Pasculano, is confirmed.
Sec.
8.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23166 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Eduardo Quinones, is confirmed.
Sec.
9.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24024 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Zairon H.
Rahim, is confirmed.
Sec.
10.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23707 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Robert Ryder, is confirmed.
Sec.
11.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23876 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Umar Shahid, is confirmed.
Sec.
12.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23934 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Umar Shahid, is confirmed.
Show all 86 changed rows (46 more)
Previous
Latest
Sec.
13.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23973 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Umar Shahid, is confirmed.
Sec.
14.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23995 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Umar Shahid, is confirmed.
Sec.
15.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23996 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Umar Shahid, is confirmed.
Sec.
16.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23997 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Umar Shahid, is confirmed.
Sec.
17.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24026 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Umar Shahid, is confirmed.
Sec.
18.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24028 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Umar Shahid, is confirmed.
Sec.
19.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24031 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Umar Shahid, is confirmed.
Sec.
20.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24046 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Umar Shahid, is confirmed.
Sec.
21.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24068 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Umar Shahid, is confirmed.
Sec.
22.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24069 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Umar Shahid, is confirmed.
Sec.
23.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24070 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Umar Shahid, is confirmed.
Sec.
24.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24094 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Umar Shahid, is confirmed.
Sec.
25.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23640 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Ronald Strano, is confirmed.
Sec.
26.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24089 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Christopher Tierinni, is confirmed.
Sec.
27.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23818 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Ramone White, is confirmed.
JUD Joint Favorable Subst.
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)
  • R01 html
  • R00 Current html

Action History

  1. ON CONSENT CALENDAR /IN CONCURRENCE

  2. ADOPTED, SENATE

  3. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 443

  4. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  5. ADOPTED, HOUSE

  6. FILE NO. 643

  7. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 414

  8. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDER

  9. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  10. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/18/17

  11. FILED WITH LCO

  12. Joint Favorable Substitute

  13. PUBLIC HEARING 0227

  14. PUBLIC HEARING 0224

  15. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary

Sponsors

  • Judiciary Committee · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Judiciary Committee

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (186)

186 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 186 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Senate Roll Call Vote 366 ADOPT

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 8000
Unaffiliated 22000
Republican 6000
Total 36000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
PAUL M. FORMICA — Yea
TIM LARSON — Yea
KEVIN KELLY — Yea
STEVE CASSANO — Yea
MARILYN MOORE — Yea
BETH BYE — Yea
EDWIN A. GOMES — Yea
TERRY B. GERRATANA — Yea
MICHAEL A. MCLACHLAN — Yea
KEVIN D. WITKOS — Yea
TONI BOUCHER — Yea
PAUL DOYLE — Yea
CARLO LEONE — Yea
CRAIG MINER — Yea
LEN SUZIO — Yea
GAYLE SLOSSBERG — Yea
ART LINARES — Yea
JOE MARKLEY — Yea
LEONARD FASANO — Yea
GEORGE LOGAN — Yea
ANTHONY GUGLIELMO — Yea
L. SCOTT FRANTZ — Yea
Bob Duff Democratic Yea
Catherine A. Osten Democratic Yea
Douglas McCrory Democratic Yea
Gary A. Winfield Democratic Yea
Joan V. Hartley Democratic Yea
John W. Fonfara Democratic Yea
Mae Flexer Democratic Yea
Martin M. Looney Democratic Yea
Eric C. Berthel Republican Yea
Heather S. Somers Republican Yea
Henri Martin Republican Yea
John A. Kissel Republican Yea
Kathy Kennedy Republican Yea
Tony Hwang Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

finance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HJ 63?
HJ 63 is sponsored by Judiciary Committee.
What is the current status of HJ 63?
This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HJ 63?
Track HJ 63 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HJ 63

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HJ 63

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →