AN ACT ADOPTING THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM RECOGNITION OF SUBSTITUTE DECISION-MAKING DOCUMENTS ACT AND REVISIN...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 884 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 884.
You're tracking SB 884
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 884 — AN ACT ADOPTING THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM RECOGNITION OF SUBSTITUTE DECISION-MAKING DOCUMENTS ACT AND REVISING THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM POWER OF ATTORNEY ACT.
Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
15 added · 20 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment made in SB 884 clarifies that a person who accepts a substitute decision-making document in good faith can assume it is valid and genuine unless they know otherwise. It also states that such a person is not required to accept a document they're asked to, thus providing flexibility in decisions about accepting these documents. Additionally, the previous wording about promoting uniformity among states was modified to remove the term "uniform" for consistency in language. The changes ensure clearer guidelines regarding substitute decision-making documents and the acceptance process.
General Assembly RaisedSubstitute Bill No.
884 January Session, 2017 LCO*_____SB00884JUD___033017____* No.AN ACT ADOPTING THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM RECOGNITION OF SUBSTITUTE DECISION-MAKING DOCUMENTS ACT AND REVISING THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM POWER OF ATTORNEY ACT.
4101 *04101_______JUD* Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
(JUD) AN ACT ADOPTING THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM RECOGNITION OF SUBSTITUTE DECISION-MAKING DOCUMENTS ACT AND REVISING THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM POWER OF ATTORNEY ACT.
(NEW) (Effective October 1, 2017) (a) Except as provided in subsection (f) of section 1-56b and sections 1-350r, 19a-579b and 19a-580g of the general statutes, a person thatwho in good faith accepts a substitute decision-making document without actual knowledge that the document is void, invalid or terminated, or that the authority of the purported decision maker is void, invalid or terminated, may assume without inquiry that the document is genuine, valid and still in effect and that the decision maker's authority is genuine, valid and still in effect.
(2) A translation of the document if the document contains, in whole or in part, a language other than English;
(b) A person thatwho is asked to accept a substitute decision-making document is not required to accept the document if:
(c) A person thatwho refuses to accept a substitute decision-making document in violation of this section is subject to:
(NEW) (Effective October 1, 2017) In applying and construing sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this uniform act, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among the states that enact it.
(NEW) (Effective October 1, 2017) Sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this act, modify, limit orand supersede the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, 15 USC 7001 et seq., but do not modify, limit or supersede Section 101(c) of said act, 15 USC 7001(c), or authorize electronic delivery of any of the notices described in Section 103(b) of said act, 15 USC 7003(b).
They are defined in the Connecticut Uniform Power of Attorney Act, which expressly permits the use of any other or different form of power of attorney desired by the parties concerned.
Know All Persons by These Presents, which are intended to constitute a GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY pursuant to the Connecticut Uniform Power of Attorney Act:
T120 T121 (W) With respect to any intellectual property interests of ( ) T122 mine, including without limitationlimitation, copyrights, contracts T123 for payments of royalties and trademarks, to act in all T124 ways with respect to such interests as if my agent were T125 the owner thereof, including without limitationlimitation, T126 registering ownership, transferring ownership and T127 recording documents to effectuate or memorialize such T128 transfer, granting and revoking licenses, entering, T129 terminating and enforcing agreements, defending T130 ownership and conferring agency upon professionals to T131 represent my interests before governmental agencies, T132 and in general, to exercise all powers with respect to the T133 intellectual property that I could if present.
(2) if the grantor is a natural person, subscribed, with or without a seal, by the grantor with his own hand or with his mark with his name annexed to it or by his agent authorized for that purpose by a power executed, acknowledged and witnessed in the manner provided for conveyances or in the manner provided for in section 1-350d1-350d, or, if the grantor is a corporation, limited liability company or partnership, subscribed by a duly authorized person;
12 July 1, 2017 47-5(a) Statement of Purpose:Legislative Commissioners:
To:In Section 8 "uniform" was deleted for statutory consistency.
(1)JUD AdoptJoint theFavorable ConnecticutSubst. Uniform Recognition of Substitute Decision-Making Documents Act, (2) revise the Connecticut Uniform Power of Attorney Act by (A) providing that forms that are substantially in the form of the statutory short form or long form may be used, and (B) adding provisions concerning intellectual property interests and access to digital devices, digital assets, user accounts and electronically stored information, and (3) ensure that a validly executed power of attorney may be used to convey land.
[Proposed-LCO deletions are enclosed in brackets.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]
View plain text versions (2)
- R01 html
- R00 Current html
Action History
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
PUBLIC ACT 17-91
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
ON CONSENT CALENDAR
-
HOUSE PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 566
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDER
-
SEN. PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 647
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 336
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/18/17
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0227
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
Sponsors
- Christine' b'Conley · Primary
- Paul R.' b'Doyle · Primary
- Joseph C.' b'Serra · Primary
- Stephanie E.' b'Cummings · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 183 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- b'Conley, Christine'
- b'Doyle, Paul R.'
- b'Serra, Joseph C.'
- b'Cummings, Stephanie E.'
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (183)
183 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 183 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL M. FORMICA | — | Yea |
| TIM LARSON | — | Yea |
| KEVIN KELLY | — | Yea |
| STEVE CASSANO | — | Yea |
| MARILYN MOORE | — | Yea |
| BETH BYE | — | Yea |
| EDWIN A. GOMES | — | Yea |
| TERRY B. GERRATANA | — | Yea |
| MICHAEL A. MCLACHLAN | — | Yea |
| KEVIN D. WITKOS | — | Yea |
| TONI BOUCHER | — | Yea |
| PAUL DOYLE | — | Yea |
| CARLO LEONE | — | Yea |
| CRAIG MINER | — | Yea |
| LEN SUZIO | — | Yea |
| GAYLE SLOSSBERG | — | Yea |
| ART LINARES | — | Yea |
| JOE MARKLEY | — | Yea |
| LEONARD FASANO | — | Yea |
| GEORGE LOGAN | — | Yea |
| ANTHONY GUGLIELMO | — | Yea |
| L. SCOTT FRANTZ | — | Yea |
| Bob Duff | Democratic | Yea |
| Catherine A. Osten | Democratic | Yea |
| Douglas McCrory | Democratic | Yea |
| Gary A. Winfield | Democratic | Yea |
| Joan V. Hartley | Democratic | Yea |
| John W. Fonfara | Democratic | Yea |
| Mae Flexer | Democratic | Yea |
| Martin M. Looney | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric C. Berthel | Republican | Yea |
| Heather S. Somers | Republican | Yea |
| Henri Martin | Republican | Yea |
| John A. Kissel | Republican | Yea |
| Kathy Kennedy | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Hwang | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 884?
- SB 884 is sponsored by b'Conley, Christine', b'Doyle, Paul R.', b'Serra, Joseph C.', and b'Cummings, Stephanie E.'.
- What is the current status of SB 884?
- This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 884?
- Track SB 884 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 884
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 884
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →