AN ACT CONCERNING STRATEGIC LITIGATION AGAINST PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND A SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 981 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 981.
You're tracking SB 981
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 981 — AN ACT CONCERNING STRATEGIC LITIGATION AGAINST PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND A SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS.
Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
14 added · 17 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes in SB 981 include a shift in the effective date, making it apply to civil actions filed on or after October 1, 2017, instead of from passage. Additionally, the definition of "matter of public concern" has been narrowed by removing references to goods, products, or services in the marketplace. This bill also specifies that the court must conduct an expedited hearing on special motions to dismiss within a fixed timeframe of thirty days, enhancing the speed of resolution for such motions.
General Assembly RaisedSubstitute Bill No.
981 January Session, 2017 LCO*_____SB00981JUD___040317____* No.AN ACT CONCERNING STRATEGIC LITIGATION AGAINST PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND A SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS.
4928 *04928_______JUD* Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
(JUD) AN ACT CONCERNING STRATEGIC LITIGATION AGAINST PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND A SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS.
(NEW) (Effective fromOctober passage1, 2017, and applicable to any civil action pendingfiled on or filed after thesaid effectivedate) date of this section) (a) As used in this section:
(1) "Matter of public concern" means an issue related to (A) health or safety, (B) environmental, economic or community well-being, (C) the government, (D)zoning aand publicother officialregulatory ormatters, public figure, or (E)(D) a good,public productofficial or servicepublic infigure; the marketplace;
(4) "Right of association" means communication betweenamong individuals who join together to collectively express, promote, pursue or defend common interests;
(b) In any civil action in which a party files a complaint, counterclaim or cross claim against an opposing party that is based on the opposing party's exercise of its right of free speech, right to petition the government, or right of association under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of thisthe state in connection with a matter of public concern, such opposing party may file a special motion to dismiss the complaint, counterclaim or cross claim.
(c) Any party filing a special motion to dismiss shall file such motion not later than sixty days after the date of service of the complaint, counterclaim or cross claim.claim described in subsection (b) of this section.
The expedited hearing shall be held not later than thirty days after the date of servicefiling of such special motion to dismiss, unless, (A) the court orders specified and limited discovery pursuant to subsection (d) of this section, in which case, the expedited hearing shall be held not later than thirty days after the date on which such specified and limited discovery must be completed, (B) the parties agree to a hearing date that is beyond the thirty-day period, or (C) the court, for good cause shown, is unable to schedule the hearing during the thirty-day period.
(3) The court shall grant a special motion to dismiss if the moving party makes an initial showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the opposing party's complaint, counterclaim or cross claim is based on the moving party's exercise of its right of free speech, right to petition the government, or right of association under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of thisthe state in connection with a matter of public concern;concern, unless the party that brought the complaint, counterclaim or cross claim sets forth with particularity the circumstances giving rise to the complaint, counterclaim or cross claim and demonstrates to the court by a preponderance of the evidence, a probability of prevailing on the merits of the complaint, counterclaim or cross claim.
unless the party that brought the complaint, counterclaim or cross claim sets forth with particularity the circumstances giving rise to the complaint, counterclaim or cross claim and demonstrates to the court by a preponderance of the evidence, a probability of prevailing on the merits of the complaint, counterclaim or cross claim.
Section 1 fromOctober passage1, 2017, and applicable to any civil action pendingfiled on or filed after thesaid effective date of this section New section Statement of Purpose:Legislative Commissioners:
ToIn establishSection a1(e) special"service" motionwas changed to dismiss"filing" infor civilaccuracy proceedingsand involvingconsistency. a strategic lawsuit against public participation.
[ProposedJUD deletionsJoint areFavorable enclosedSubst. in brackets.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]
View plain text versions (2)
- R01 html
- R00 Current html
Action History
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
PUBLIC ACT 17-71
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
HOUSE PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 646
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDER
-
ON CONSENT CALENDAR
-
SEN. PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 675
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 357
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/19/17
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0327
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
Sponsors
- Paul R.' b'Doyle · Primary
- Susan M.' b'Johnson · Primary
- William' b'Tong · Primary
- Steven J.' b'Stafstrom · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 183 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- b'Doyle, Paul R.'
- b'Johnson, Susan M.'
- b'Tong, William'
- b'Stafstrom, Steven J.'
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (183)
183 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 183 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL M. FORMICA | — | Yea |
| TIM LARSON | — | Yea |
| KEVIN KELLY | — | Yea |
| STEVE CASSANO | — | Yea |
| MARILYN MOORE | — | Yea |
| BETH BYE | — | Yea |
| EDWIN A. GOMES | — | Yea |
| TERRY B. GERRATANA | — | Yea |
| MICHAEL A. MCLACHLAN | — | Yea |
| KEVIN D. WITKOS | — | Yea |
| TONI BOUCHER | — | Yea |
| PAUL DOYLE | — | Yea |
| CARLO LEONE | — | Yea |
| CRAIG MINER | — | Yea |
| LEN SUZIO | — | Yea |
| GAYLE SLOSSBERG | — | Yea |
| ART LINARES | — | Yea |
| JOE MARKLEY | — | Yea |
| LEONARD FASANO | — | Yea |
| GEORGE LOGAN | — | Yea |
| ANTHONY GUGLIELMO | — | Yea |
| L. SCOTT FRANTZ | — | Yea |
| Bob Duff | Democratic | Yea |
| Catherine A. Osten | Democratic | Yea |
| Douglas McCrory | Democratic | Yea |
| Gary A. Winfield | Democratic | Yea |
| Joan V. Hartley | Democratic | Yea |
| John W. Fonfara | Democratic | Yea |
| Mae Flexer | Democratic | Yea |
| Martin M. Looney | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric C. Berthel | Republican | Yea |
| Heather S. Somers | Republican | Yea |
| Henri Martin | Republican | Yea |
| John A. Kissel | Republican | Yea |
| Kathy Kennedy | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Hwang | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 981?
- SB 981 is sponsored by b'Doyle, Paul R.', b'Johnson, Susan M.', b'Tong, William', and b'Stafstrom, Steven J.'.
- What is the current status of SB 981?
- This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 981?
- Track SB 981 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 981
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 981
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →