AN ACT CONCERNING REVISIONS TO VARIOUS STATUTES CONCERNING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1003 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1003.
You're tracking SB 1003
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1003 — AN ACT CONCERNING REVISIONS TO VARIOUS STATUTES CONCERNING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.
Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
9 added · 19 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment replaces Section 53a-214 with provisions regarding criminal lockout, specifying that an owner, lessor, or sublessor who denies access to a tenant without a court order can be guilty of this offense. Additionally, it clarifies the definition of who qualifies as a lessee and removes the previous inclusion of "landlord." This change matters because it establishes clearer legal protections against unlawful eviction practices, particularly for commercial tenants, defining their rights in such situations.
General Assembly RaisedSubstitute Bill No.
1003 January Session, 2017 LCO*_____SB01003JUD___040417____* No.AN ACT CONCERNING REVISIONS TO VARIOUS STATUTES CONCERNING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.
5117 *05117_______JUD* Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
(JUD) AN ACT CONCERNING REVISIONS TO VARIOUS STATUTES CONCERNING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.
Section 53a-214 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2017):
(a) [A landlord of a] An owner, lessor or sublessor of any dwelling unit subject to the provisions of chapter 830 [, an owner of such a unit] or any commercial premises or property, or the agent of such [landlord or] owner, lessor or sublessor is guilty of criminal lockout when, without benefit of a court order, [he] such owner, lessor or sublessor or agent deprives a [tenant, as defined in subsection (l) of section 47a-1,] lessee, sublessee or person entitled under a rental agreement to occupy such dwelling unit or such premises or property to the exclusion of others of access to [his dwelling unit or his] such dwelling unit or premises or property or his or her personal possessions.
(b) Criminal lockout is a class C misdemeanor.
Sec.
6.
7.6.
8.7.
9.8.
10.9.
5 October 1, 2017 53a-21453a-123 Sec.
6 October 1, 2017 53a-12354-86d Sec.
7 October 1, 2017 54-86d54-86e Sec.
8 Octoberfrom 1,passage 2017PA 54-86e11-252, Sec.
9 from passage PA 11-252, Sec.
109 July 1, 2017 Repealer section StatementJUD ofJoint Purpose:Favorable Subst.
To (1) make technical and other changes to the statute permitting state action to abate public nuisance;
(2) provide for the use of electronic signatures in certain reports;
(3) ensure that all law enforcement professionals who work for the state or a municipality are covered for purposes of indemnification;
(4) make restitution orders in criminal cases enforceable for the same duration as in civil matters;
(5) provide for criminal lockout protection to tenants of nonresidential properties;
(6) provide an enhanced penalty for victims of larceny who have been deemed incapable by the probate court;
(7) correct statutory citations;
(8) update the purpose of the eyewitness identification task force to include emerging technologies;
and (9) repeal a reporting requirement duplicative of the reporting requirement of section 17b-99b of the general statutes.
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]
View plain text versions (2)
- R01 html
- R00 Current html
Action History
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
PUBLIC ACT 17-87
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
HOUSE PASSED
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 486
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDER
-
ON CONSENT CALENDAR
-
SENATE PASSED
-
FILE NO. 676
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 358
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/19/17
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0315
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
Sponsors
- Joseph C.' b'Serra · Primary
- William A.' b'Petit · Primary
- Kevin' b'Skulczyck · Primary
- Heather B.' b'Somers · Primary
- Paul R.' b'Doyle · Primary
- Kevin' b'Ryan · Primary
- Daniel S.' b'Rovero · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →7 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 180 not signed on
Sponsors (7)
- b'Serra, Joseph C.'
- b'Petit, William A.'
- b'Skulczyck, Kevin'
- b'Somers, Heather B.'
- b'Doyle, Paul R.'
- b'Ryan, Kevin'
- b'Rovero, Daniel S.'
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (180)
180 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 180 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL M. FORMICA | — | Yea |
| TIM LARSON | — | Yea |
| KEVIN KELLY | — | Yea |
| STEVE CASSANO | — | Not Voting |
| MARILYN MOORE | — | Yea |
| BETH BYE | — | Yea |
| EDWIN A. GOMES | — | Yea |
| TERRY B. GERRATANA | — | Yea |
| MICHAEL A. MCLACHLAN | — | Yea |
| KEVIN D. WITKOS | — | Yea |
| TONI BOUCHER | — | Yea |
| PAUL DOYLE | — | Yea |
| CARLO LEONE | — | Yea |
| CRAIG MINER | — | Yea |
| LEN SUZIO | — | Yea |
| GAYLE SLOSSBERG | — | Yea |
| ART LINARES | — | Yea |
| JOE MARKLEY | — | Yea |
| LEONARD FASANO | — | Yea |
| GEORGE LOGAN | — | Yea |
| ANTHONY GUGLIELMO | — | Yea |
| HEATHER BOND | — | Yea |
| L. SCOTT FRANTZ | — | Not Voting |
| Bob Duff | Democratic | Yea |
| Catherine A. Osten | Democratic | Yea |
| Douglas McCrory | Democratic | Yea |
| Gary A. Winfield | Democratic | Yea |
| Joan V. Hartley | Democratic | Yea |
| John W. Fonfara | Democratic | Yea |
| Mae Flexer | Democratic | Yea |
| Martin M. Looney | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric C. Berthel | Republican | Yea |
| Henri Martin | Republican | Yea |
| John A. Kissel | Republican | Yea |
| Kathy Kennedy | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Hwang | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1003?
- SB 1003 is sponsored by b'Serra, Joseph C.', b'Petit, William A.', b'Skulczyck, Kevin', b'Somers, Heather B.', b'Doyle, Paul R.', b'Ryan, Kevin', and b'Rovero, Daniel S.'.
- What is the current status of SB 1003?
- This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1003?
- Track SB 1003 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1003
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1003
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →