Connecticut 2017 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 1003 — AN ACT CONCERNING REVISIONS TO VARIOUS STATUTES CONCERNING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.

Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

9 added · 19 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment replaces Section 53a-214 with provisions regarding criminal lockout, specifying that an owner, lessor, or sublessor who denies access to a tenant without a court order can be guilty of this offense. Additionally, it clarifies the definition of who qualifies as a lessee and removes the previous inclusion of "landlord." This change matters because it establishes clearer legal protections against unlawful eviction practices, particularly for commercial tenants, defining their rights in such situations.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly   Raised Bill No.
General Assembly   Substitute Bill No.
1003 January Session, 2017   LCO No.
1003 January Session, 2017   *_____SB01003JUD___040417____* AN ACT CONCERNING REVISIONS TO VARIOUS STATUTES CONCERNING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.
5117   *05117_______JUD* Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY   Introduced by:
  (JUD)   AN ACT CONCERNING REVISIONS TO VARIOUS STATUTES CONCERNING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.
Section 53a-214 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2017):
(a) [A landlord of a] An owner, lessor or sublessor of any dwelling unit subject to the provisions of chapter 830 [, an owner of such a unit] or any commercial premises or property, or the agent of such [landlord or] owner, lessor or sublessor is guilty of criminal lockout when, without benefit of a court order, [he] such owner, lessor or sublessor or agent deprives a [tenant, as defined in subsection (l) of section 47a-1,] lessee, sublessee or person entitled under a rental agreement to occupy such dwelling unit or such premises or property to the exclusion of others of access to [his dwelling unit or his] such dwelling unit or premises or property or his or her personal possessions.
(b) Criminal lockout is a class C misdemeanor.
Sec.
6.
7.
6.
8.
7.
9.
8.
10.
9.
5 October 1, 2017 53a-214 Sec.
5 October 1, 2017 53a-123 Sec.
6 October 1, 2017 53a-123 Sec.
6 October 1, 2017 54-86d Sec.
7 October 1, 2017 54-86d Sec.
7 October 1, 2017 54-86e Sec.
8 October 1, 2017 54-86e Sec.
8 from passage PA 11-252, Sec.
9 from passage PA 11-252, Sec.
10 July 1, 2017 Repealer section Statement of Purpose:
9 July 1, 2017 Repealer section JUD Joint Favorable Subst.
To (1) make technical and other changes to the statute permitting state action to abate public nuisance;
(2) provide for the use of electronic signatures in certain reports;
(3) ensure that all law enforcement professionals who work for the state or a municipality are covered for purposes of indemnification;
(4) make restitution orders in criminal cases enforceable for the same duration as in civil matters;
(5) provide for criminal lockout protection to tenants of nonresidential properties;
(6) provide an enhanced penalty for victims of larceny who have been deemed incapable by the probate court;
(7) correct statutory citations;
(8) update the purpose of the eyewitness identification task force to include emerging technologies;
and (9) repeal a reporting requirement duplicative of the reporting requirement of section 17b-99b of the general statutes.
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]
View plain text versions (2)
  • R01 html
  • R00 Current html

Action History

  1. SIGNED BY GOVERNOR

  2. TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR

  3. TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE

  4. PUBLIC ACT 17-87

  5. IN CONCURRENCE

  6. HOUSE PASSED

  7. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 486

  8. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDER

  9. ON CONSENT CALENDAR

  10. SENATE PASSED

  11. FILE NO. 676

  12. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 358

  13. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  14. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  15. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/19/17

  16. FILED WITH LCO

  17. Joint Favorable Substitute

  18. PUBLIC HEARING 0315

  19. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary

Sponsors

  • Joseph C.' b'Serra · Primary
  • William A.' b'Petit · Primary
  • Kevin' b'Skulczyck · Primary
  • Heather B.' b'Somers · Primary
  • Paul R.' b'Doyle · Primary
  • Kevin' b'Ryan · Primary
  • Daniel S.' b'Rovero · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

7 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 180 not signed on

Sponsors (7)

  • b'Serra, Joseph C.'
  • b'Petit, William A.'
  • b'Skulczyck, Kevin'
  • b'Somers, Heather B.'
  • b'Doyle, Paul R.'
  • b'Ryan, Kevin'
  • b'Rovero, Daniel S.'

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (180)

180 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 180 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 8000
Unaffiliated 21002
Republican 5000
Total 34002
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
PAUL M. FORMICA — Yea
TIM LARSON — Yea
KEVIN KELLY — Yea
STEVE CASSANO — Not Voting
MARILYN MOORE — Yea
BETH BYE — Yea
EDWIN A. GOMES — Yea
TERRY B. GERRATANA — Yea
MICHAEL A. MCLACHLAN — Yea
KEVIN D. WITKOS — Yea
TONI BOUCHER — Yea
PAUL DOYLE — Yea
CARLO LEONE — Yea
CRAIG MINER — Yea
LEN SUZIO — Yea
GAYLE SLOSSBERG — Yea
ART LINARES — Yea
JOE MARKLEY — Yea
LEONARD FASANO — Yea
GEORGE LOGAN — Yea
ANTHONY GUGLIELMO — Yea
HEATHER BOND — Yea
L. SCOTT FRANTZ — Not Voting
Bob Duff Democratic Yea
Catherine A. Osten Democratic Yea
Douglas McCrory Democratic Yea
Gary A. Winfield Democratic Yea
Joan V. Hartley Democratic Yea
John W. Fonfara Democratic Yea
Mae Flexer Democratic Yea
Martin M. Looney Democratic Yea
Eric C. Berthel Republican Yea
Henri Martin Republican Yea
John A. Kissel Republican Yea
Kathy Kennedy Republican Yea
Tony Hwang Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1003?
SB 1003 is sponsored by b'Serra, Joseph C.', b'Petit, William A.', b'Skulczyck, Kevin', b'Somers, Heather B.', b'Doyle, Paul R.', b'Ryan, Kevin', and b'Rovero, Daniel S.'.
What is the current status of SB 1003?
This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1003?
Track SB 1003 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1003

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1003

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →