Redevelopment.
This bill updates procedures for tax allocation to redevelopment agencies in Santa Cruz and Watsonville. It also exempts certain redevelopment plans from environmental laws and establishes specific considerations for economic impact.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 39 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 39.
You're tracking SB 39
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 39 — Redevelopment.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 1989-1990, 1st Special Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
The bill revises tax allocation procedures for redevelopment projects in specific California cities.
This bill updates procedures for tax allocation to redevelopment agencies in Santa Cruz and Watsonville. It also exempts certain redevelopment plans from environmental laws and establishes specific considerations for economic impact.
What this means for you
- Small Business: This may impact small businesses in Santa Cruz and Watsonville due to changes in tax allocations affecting redevelopment projects.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill SB 39 has been updated by adding some new information. This change likely clarifies or provides additional context that could be important for understanding the bill's purpose. Removing the old text suggests that lawmakers are focused on streamlining the information to make it clearer for everyone involved. Simplifying the language can help ensure that the bill is more accessible to the general public and easier to discuss during legislative sessions.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Chaptered 07/18/90 - Chaptered Current pdf July 18, 1990
- SB39 View text html
Sponsors
- Mello · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Mello
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 39?
- SB 39 is sponsored by Mello.
- What is the current status of SB 39?
- This bill died with 1989-1990, 1st Special Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 39?
- Track SB 39 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 39
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 39
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →