SB 976 — AN ACT CONCERNING CONSERVATOR ACCOUNTABILITY.
Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
10 added · 13 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 976 adds a requirement that the Probate Court must send notice of a hearing regarding an audit report to all parties involved, along with the report itself. This audit report becomes admissible in evidence, allowing any interested party the right to have the auditor appear as a witness if available. Additionally, the amendment clarifies that conservators must follow specific standards of practice when exercising their duties. This change aims to improve transparency and accountability during the auditing process of conservators' management of estates.
General Assembly RaisedSubstitute Bill No.
976 January Session, 2017 LCO*_____SB00976JUD___033017____* No.AN ACT CONCERNING CONSERVATOR ACCOUNTABILITY.
4703 *04703_______JUD* Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
(JUD) AN ACT CONCERNING CONSERVATOR ACCOUNTABILITY.
(f) Upon receipt of an audit report under subsection (e) of this section, the Probate Court shall send notice of the hearing on the account and audit report, together with a copy of the audit report, to all parties.
(a) A conservator of the estate appointed under section 45a-646, 45a-650 or 45a-654 shall, within two months after the date of the conservator's appointment, make and file in the Court[Court of Probate,Probate] Probate Court, an inventory, under penalty of false statement, of the estate of the conserved person, with the properties thereof appraised or caused to be appraised, by such conservator, at fair market value as of the date of the conservator's appointment.
(b) Any conservator of the estate of a married person may apply such portion of the property of the conserved person to the support, maintenance and medical treatment of the conserved person's spouse which the Court[Court of Probate,Probate] Probate Court, upon hearing after notice, decides to be proper under the circumstances of the case.
(c) The conservator shall report at least annually to the probate[probate courtcourt] Probate Court that appointed the conservator regarding the condition of the conserved person, the efforts made to encourage the independence of the conserved person and the conservator's statement on whether the appointment of the conservator is the least restrictive means of intervention for managing the conserved person's needs.
4 January 1, 2018 45a-656 Statement of Purpose:Legislative Commissioners:
ToIn provideSection the3(a) Probateand Court(b), Administrator"Court withof theProbate" authoritywas to:changed to "Probate Court";
(1) Audit an account of a conservator of the estate, and (2) adopt, in consultationSection with4(c) the"probate Connecticutcourt" Probatewas Assembly,changed standards of practice that will provide guidance to court-appointed"Probate conservatorsCourt" infor theconsistency. performance of their duties.
[ProposedJUD deletionsJoint areFavorable enclosedSubst. in brackets.
Proposed-LCO additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]
View plain text versions (2)
- R01 html
- R00 Current html
Action History
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
PUBLIC ACT 17-7
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
HOUSE PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 483
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDER
-
ON CONSENT CALENDAR
-
SEN. PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 617
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 320
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/12/17
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0313
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
Sponsors
- Terry B.' b'Gerratana · Primary
- William' b'Duff · Primary
- John K.' b'Hampton · Primary
- Patricia Billie' b'Miller · Primary
- Peter A.' b'Tercyak · Primary
- John A.' b'Kissel · Primary
- Art' b'Linares · Primary
- Michael A.' b'McLachlan · Primary
- Bob' b'Godfrey · Primary
- Bruce V.' b'Morris · Primary
- Rosa C.' b'Rebimbas · Primary
- Lonnie' b'Reed · Primary
- Terry B.' b'Adams · Primary
- Nicole' b'Klarides-Ditria · Primary
- Gail' b'Lavielle · Primary
- Robert' b'Sanchez · Primary
- Derek' b'Slap · Primary
- Daniel S.' b'Rovero · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →18 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 169 not signed on
Sponsors (18)
- b'Gerratana, Terry B.'
- b'Duff, William'
- b'Hampton, John K.'
- b'Miller, Patricia Billie'
- b'Tercyak, Peter A.'
- b'Kissel, John A.'
- b'Linares, Art'
- b'McLachlan, Michael A.'
- b'Godfrey, Bob'
- b'Morris, Bruce V.'
- b'Rebimbas, Rosa C.'
- b'Reed, Lonnie'
- b'Adams, Terry B.'
- b'Klarides-Ditria, Nicole'
- b'Lavielle, Gail'
- b'Sanchez, Robert'
- b'Slap, Derek'
- b'Rovero, Daniel S.'
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (169)
169 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 169 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL M. FORMICA | — | Yea |
| TIM LARSON | — | Yea |
| KEVIN KELLY | — | Yea |
| STEVE CASSANO | — | Not Voting |
| MARILYN MOORE | — | Yea |
| BETH BYE | — | Yea |
| EDWIN A. GOMES | — | Yea |
| TERRY B. GERRATANA | — | Yea |
| MICHAEL A. MCLACHLAN | — | Yea |
| KEVIN D. WITKOS | — | Yea |
| TONI BOUCHER | — | Yea |
| PAUL DOYLE | — | Yea |
| CARLO LEONE | — | Yea |
| CRAIG MINER | — | Yea |
| LEN SUZIO | — | Yea |
| GAYLE SLOSSBERG | — | Yea |
| ART LINARES | — | Yea |
| JOE MARKLEY | — | Yea |
| LEONARD FASANO | — | Yea |
| GEORGE LOGAN | — | Yea |
| ANTHONY GUGLIELMO | — | Yea |
| HEATHER BOND | — | Yea |
| L. SCOTT FRANTZ | — | Not Voting |
| Bob Duff | Democratic | Yea |
| Catherine A. Osten | Democratic | Yea |
| Douglas McCrory | Democratic | Yea |
| Gary A. Winfield | Democratic | Yea |
| Joan V. Hartley | Democratic | Yea |
| John W. Fonfara | Democratic | Yea |
| Mae Flexer | Democratic | Yea |
| Martin M. Looney | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric C. Berthel | Republican | Yea |
| Henri Martin | Republican | Yea |
| John A. Kissel | Republican | Yea |
| Kathy Kennedy | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Hwang | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 976?
- SB 976 is sponsored by b'Gerratana, Terry B.', b'Duff, William', b'Hampton, John K.', b'Miller, Patricia Billie', b'Tercyak, Peter A.', b'Kissel, John A.', b'Linares, Art', b'McLachlan, Michael A.', b'Godfrey, Bob', b'Morris, Bruce V.', b'Rebimbas, Rosa C.', b'Reed, Lonnie', b'Adams, Terry B.', b'Klarides-Ditria, Nicole', b'Lavielle, Gail', b'Sanchez, Robert', b'Slap, Derek', and b'Rovero, Daniel S.'.
- What is the current status of SB 976?
- This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 976?
- Track SB 976 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 976
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 976
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →