Colorado 2025 First Extraordinary Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 18 D · 1 R cosponsors

HB 1003 — Insurance Premium Tax Rate for Home Offices

Last action — Governor Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced August 21, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on August 28, 2025.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 29 sponsors

    4 primary, 25 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (18 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

The act, beginning in the 2026 calendar year, repeals the reduced insurance premium tax rate tax expenditure for a home office or regional home office.APPROVED by Governor August 28, 2025EFFECTIVE August 28, 2025(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

37 added · 42 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to Bill HB 1003 remove a tax break that allowed companies with home offices or regional headquarters in Colorado to pay a lower insurance premium tax rate. This change follows findings that the tax incentive has not significantly impacted job retention or growth, with many companies still reducing their workforce despite the break. By aligning Colorado's tax laws more closely with other states and eliminating what is seen as an ineffective tax expenditure, the state aims to create a fairer business environment and potentially increase tax revenue. This matters because it could enhance the state’s competitiveness and provide more funding for public services.

→
Previous
Latest
NOTE:
HOUSE BILL 25B-l003 BY REPRESENTATIVE(S) Mabrey and Boesenecker, Bacon, Brown, Camacho, Clifford, Duran, Froelich, Garcia, Lieder, Lindsay, McCormick, Sirota, Smith, Story, Titone, Willford, Zokaie, McCluskie;
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
HOUSE BILL 25B-1003 BY REPRESENTATIVE(S) Mabrey and Boesenecker, Bacon, Brown, Camacho,Clifford,Duran,Froelich,Garcia,Lieder,Lindsay,McCormick, Sirota, Smith, Story, Titone, Willford, Zokaie, McCluskie;
C ONCERNING ADJUSTMENTS TO THE INSURANCE PREMIUM TAX RATE TAX EXPENDITURE FOR A HOME OFFICE OR REGIONAL HOME OFFICE .
CONCERNING ADJUSTMENTS TO THE INSURANCE PREMIUM TAX RATE TAX EXPENDITURE FOR A HOME OFFICE OR REGIONAL HOME OFFICE.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
Be it enacted by the General Assembly ofthe State ofColorado:
(1) The general assembly finds that, based on the office of the state auditor's 2 evaluations of the reduced insurance premium tax rate for a company with a home office or regional home office in Colorado, the reduced insurance premium tax rate was designed to create an incentive to maintain a substantial workforce presence in the state.
(I) The general assembly finds that, based on the office of the state auditor's 2 evaluations of the reduced insurance premium tax rate for a company with a home office or regional home office in Colorado, the reduced insurance premium tax rate was designed to create an incentive to maintain a substantial workforce presence in the state.
(a) The insurance premium tax rate tax expenditure has not met its intended purpose since, as evidenced by the office of the state auditor's 2020and2025evaluationsofthetaxexpenditure,thehiringandinvestment Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
(a) The insurance premium tax rate tax expenditure has not met its intended purpose since, as evidenced by the office of the state auditor's and2025 evaluations ofthe taxexpenditure, the hiringandinvestment Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletionsfrom existing law andsuch material is notpart of the act.
levels of the vast majority of all insurance companies claiming the tax expenditure have not been substantiallyaffected bythe presence of the tax expenditure;
levels of the vast majority of all insurance companies claiming the tax expenditure have not been substantially affected by the presence ofthe tax expenditure;
and (b) In its 2025 evaluation of the insurance premium tax rate tax expenditure, the office of the state auditor found that, from 2022 through 2024, 15 of the 18 insurers that claimed the tax expenditure actually reducedtheirColoradoworkforcesbyabout4,300employees,whilethetax benefit that those insurers received from the tax expenditure increased by approximately $17,500,000.
and (b) In its 2025 evaluation of the insurance premium tax rate tax expenditure, the office ofthe state auditor found that, from 2022 through 2024, 15 of the 18 insurers that claimed the tax expenditure actually reducedtheirColoradoworkforces byabout4,300 employees,whilethetax benefit that those insurers received from the tax expenditure increased by approximately $17,500,000.
(a) The primary purposes of repealing the reduced insurance premiumtaxrateforacompanywithahomeofficeorregionalhomeoffice in Colorado are to better align the state's insurance premium tax code with the tax codes of other states, sothat Colorado is less of an outlier regarding how insurance taxpayers compute their taxes owed, and to streamline insurance premium tax statutes byeliminating a tax expenditure that is not meeting its intended purpose;
(a) The primary purposes of repealing the reduced insurance premiumtaxrate for acompanywith ahome office orregional home office in Colorado are to better align the state's insurance premium tax code with the tax codes ofotherstates, so that Colorado is less ofan outlier regarding how insurance taxpayers compute their taxes owed, and to streamline insurance premium tax statutes by eliminating a tax expenditure that is not meeting its intended purpose;
and (b) Any revenue gain that results from the improved alignment of thestate'sinsurancepremiumtaxcodewiththetaxcodesofotherstatesand the streamlining of the insurance premium tax statutes is:
and (b) Any revenue gain that results from the improved alignment of the state's insurancepremiumtaxcodewiththe taxcodes ofotherstates and the streamlining ofthe insurance premium tax statutes is:
(I) Incidental to the primary purpose of better aligning the state's insurance premium tax code with the tax codes of other states;
(I) Incidental to the primary purpose of better aligning the state's insurance premium tax code with the tax codes ofother states;
(3) Therefore, the general assembly declares, consistent with the Coloradosupremecourt'sholdinginTABORFound.v.Reg'lTransp.Dist., CO 29, that legislation causing onlyan incidental and de minimis tax revenue increase does not amount to a new tax or a tax policy change that requires advance voter approval under section 20 of article X of the Colorado constitution, the removal of the reduced insurance premium tax rate for a companywith a home office or regional home office in Colorado PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 25B-1003 is neither a new tax nor a tax policy change that requires voter approval.
(3) Therefore, the general assembly declares, consistent with the Colorado supreme court's holding in TABOR Found.
v.
Reg'/ Transp.
Dist., CO 29, that legislation causing only an incidental and de minimis tax revenue increase does not amount to a new tax or a tax policy change that requires advance voter approval under section 20 of article X of the Colorado constitution, the removal ofthe reduced insurance premium tax rate for a company with a home office orregional home office in Colorado PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 25B-1003 is neither a new tax nor a tax policy change that requires voter approval.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-3-209, amend (1)(b)(I) introductory portion and (1)(b)(I)(B);
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-3-209, amend (l)(b)(I) introductory portion and (l)(b)(I)(B);
and add (1)(b)(IV) as follows:
and add (l)(b)(IV) as follows:
(1) (b) (I) The rate of tax shalISas follows:
(1) (b) (I) The rate of tashall beIS as follows:
(B) For DIRECT WRITTEN PREMIUMS IN 2025, FOR companies maintainingahomeofficeoraregionalhomeofficeinthisstate,therateof tax on the gross amount shall beonepercent.O NANDAFTER JANUARY 1, 2026, THE TAX RATE IS TWO PERCENT .
(B) For DIRECT WRITTEN PREMIUMS IN 2025, FOR companies maintaining a home office oraregional home office inthis state, the rate of tax on the gross amountshall beISone percent.
(IV) S UBSECTIONS (1)(b)(I)(B), (1)(b)(II), (1)(b)(II.5), (1)(b)(II.7), AND (1)(b)(IIIOF THIS SECTION AND THIS SUBSECTION (1)(b)(IV) ARE REPEALED , EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31, 2026.
ON AND AFTER JANUARY 1, 2026, THE TAX RATE ISTWO PERCENT.
(IV) SUBSECTIONS (l)(b)(I)(B), (l)(b)(II), (l)(b)(Il.5), (l)(b)(Il.7), AND ( 1)(b)(Ill) OF THIS SECTION AND THIS SUBSECTION (1)(b)(IV) ARE REPEALED, EFFECTIVEDECEMBER31, 2026.
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 25B-1003 the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservation ofthe public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 25B-1003 the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
____________________________ ____________________________ Julie McCluskie James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE ____________________________ ____________________________ Connor Randall Esther van Mourik ACTING CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE ~~k-- CoruYor Randall Esther van Mourik ACTING CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE t h APPROVED OY\1YJv(s.d'lAv3v~➔ 28 V J---~ C:45arv\ (Date and Time) Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 25B-1003
/ GOVE STATE F COLORADO PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 25B-1003
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  3. Signed by the President of the Senate

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  6. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments

  7. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  8. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Appropriations

  9. Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  10. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over to 08/24/2025 - No Amendments

  11. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  12. Introduced In House - Assigned to Appropriations

  13. House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 25 co-sponsors · 72 not signed on · 16 voted No

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (25)

Not signed on (72)

72 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 72 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

BILL

Passed 22 Yea · 13 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 18100
Republican 01000
Unaffiliated 4200
Total 221300
% of votes cast 63%37%0%0%
How each member voted (35)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Nay
Pelton R. — Nay
President — Yea
Michaelson Jenet — Yea
Winter F. — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Nay
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Nay
Cleave Simpson Republican Nay
Janice Rich Republican Nay
John Carson Republican Nay
Larry Liston Republican Nay
Lisa Frizell Republican Nay
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Nay
Marc Catlin Republican Nay
Mark Baisley Republican Nay
Scott Bright Republican Nay

Official roll call →

ADOPT REPORT

Passed 22 Yea · 13 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 18100
Republican 01000
Unaffiliated 4200
Total 221300
% of votes cast 63%37%0%0%
How each member voted (35)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Nay
Pelton R. — Nay
President — Yea
Michaelson Jenet — Yea
Winter F. — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Nay
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Nay
Cleave Simpson Republican Nay
Janice Rich Republican Nay
John Carson Republican Nay
Larry Liston Republican Nay
Lisa Frizell Republican Nay
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Nay
Marc Catlin Republican Nay
Mark Baisley Republican Nay
Scott Bright Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 0400
Democrat 7000
Total 7400
% of votes cast 64%36%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Yea
Brianna Titone Democrat Yea
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Yea
Emily Sirota Democrat Yea
Junie Joseph Democrat Yea
Karen McCormick Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Carlos Barron Republican Nay
Dan Woog Republican Nay
Rick Taggart Republican Nay
Ryan Gonzalez Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Adopt amendment L.001

Passed 7 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 0400
Democrat 7000
Total 7400
% of votes cast 64%36%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Yea
Brianna Titone Democrat Yea
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Yea
Emily Sirota Democrat Yea
Junie Joseph Democrat Yea
Karen McCormick Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Carlos Barron Republican Nay
Dan Woog Republican Nay
Rick Taggart Republican Nay
Ryan Gonzalez Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 1003 do?
The act, beginning in the 2026 calendar year, repeals the reduced insurance premium tax rate tax expenditure for a home office or regional home office.APPROVED by Governor August 28, 2025EFFECTIVE August 28, 2025(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors HB 1003?
HB 1003 is sponsored by K. Wallace, T. Sullivan, C. Kipp, I. Jodeh, L. Cutter, J. Coleman, L. García, M. Weissman, J. Gonzales, Javier Mabrey (Democrat), Kyle Brown (Democrat), Sean Camacho (Democrat), Monica Duran (Democrat), Meg Froelich (Democrat), Sheila Lieder (Democrat), Mandy Lindsay (Democrat), Julie McCluskie (Democrat), Karen McCormick (Democrat), Lesley Smith (Democrat), Tammy Story (Democrat), Brianna Titone (Democrat), Jenny Willford (Democrat), Yara Zokaie (Democrat), Andrew Boesenecker (Democrat), Jennifer Bacon (Democrat), Chad Clifford (Democrat), Emily Sirota (Democrat), Ty Winter (Republican), and Michaelson Jenet.
What is the current status of HB 1003?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced August 21, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 1003?
Track HB 1003 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1003

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1003

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →