Additions to Definition Federal Taxable Income
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1020 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1020.
You're tracking HB 1020
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1020 — Additions to Definition Federal Taxable Income
Last action — Introduced In House - Assigned to State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 First Extraordinary Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
For tax years commencing on and after January 1, 2026, current law requires taxpayers to add the amount of any overtime compensation excluded or deducted from that taxpayer's federal gross income to that taxpayer's federal taxable income for purposes of determining the taxpayer's state taxable income. The bill repeals this addition and clarifies that this addition is "a tax policy change directly causing a net tax revenue gain to any district", so that reinstating this addition requires voter approval in advance pursuant to section 20 (4)(a) of article X of the state constitution.For tax years commencing before January 1, 2026, current law requires certain taxpayers to add to their federal taxable income, for purposes of determining their state taxable income, an amount equal to the federal qualified business income deduction allowed under section 199A of the federal "Internal Revenue Code of 1986". The bill clarifies that extending this tax policy to apply to any tax year commencing on or after January 1, 2026, would be "a tax policy change directly causing a net tax revenue gain to any district" and requires voter approval in advance pursuant to section 20 (4)(a) of article X of the state constitution.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf August 21, 2025
Action History
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs
-
House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Postpone Indefinitely
Sponsors
- B. Pelton · Primary
- B. Kirkmeyer · Primary
- R. Pugliese · Primary
- Jarvis Caldwell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 98 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- B. Pelton
- B. Kirkmeyer
- R. Pugliese
- Jarvis Caldwell Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (98)
98 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 98 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 27% | 64% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Nay |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Nay |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Nay |
| Jenny Willford | Democrat | Nay |
| Lesley Smith | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Nay |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 27% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jenny Willford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lesley Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1020 do?
- For tax years commencing on and after January 1, 2026, current law requires taxpayers to add the amount of any overtime compensation excluded or deducted from that taxpayer's federal gross income to that taxpayer's federal taxable income for purposes of determining the taxpayer's state taxable income. The bill repeals this addition and clarifies that this addition is "a tax policy change directly causing a net tax revenue gain to any district", so that reinstating this addition requires voter approval in advance pursuant to section 20 (4)(a) of article X of the state constitution.For tax years commencing before January 1, 2026, current law requires certain taxpayers to add to their federal taxable income, for purposes of determining their state taxable income, an amount equal to the federal qualified business income deduction allowed under section 199A of the federal "Internal Revenue Code of 1986". The bill clarifies that extending this tax policy to apply to any tax year commencing on or after January 1, 2026, would be "a tax policy change directly causing a net tax revenue gain to any district" and requires voter approval in advance pursuant to section 20 (4)(a) of article X of the state constitution.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
- Who sponsors HB 1020?
- HB 1020 is sponsored by B. Pelton, B. Kirkmeyer, R. Pugliese, and Jarvis Caldwell (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 1020?
- This bill died with 2025 First Extraordinary Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1020?
- Track HB 1020 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1020
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1020
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →