SB 25-288 — Intimate Digital Depictions Criminal & Civil Actions
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 09, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on June 02, 2025.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
23 sponsors
3 primary, 20 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (20 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
The act creates a cause of action against a person who discloses or threatens to disclose a highly realistic but false visual depiction of another individual (depicted individual) that has been created, altered, or produced by generative AI, image editing software, or computer-generated means and that depicts the intimate body parts of the depicted individual or certain sexual acts involving the depicted individual (intimate digital depiction). A depicted individual who has suffered harm from the nonconsensual disclosure or threatened disclosure of an intimate digital depiction has a cause of action against the person who disclosed or threatened to disclose the intimate digital depiction if the person knew or acted with reckless disregard for whether the depicted individual: Did not consent to the disclosure; Would experience severe emotional distress due to the disclosure or threatened disclosure; and Was identifiable. The act creates an exception to its civil liability provisions for a provider of the technology used to create an intimate digital depiction. Other exceptions include disclosures related to matters of public concern, parody, satire, and impersonation; disclosures made in good faith in various circumstances; and broadcasts of third-party content under certain conditions. A successful plaintiff may recover the defendant's monetary gain from the intimate digital depiction; either actual damages or liquidated damages of $150,000; exemplary damages; and litigation costs, including reasonable attorney fees. A court may also order the defendant to cease disclosure of the intimate digital depiction. In the context of the criminal law punishing sexual exploitation of a child, the act updates the definition of "sexually exploitative material" to include realistic computer-generated digital depictions that depict an identifiable child. The act changes the criminal offenses of posting a private image for harassment and posting a private image for pecuniary gain to the related offenses of disclosing a private intimate image or intimate digital depiction for the same purposes. A person who is eighteen years of age or older commits disclosure of a private intimate image or intimate digital depiction for harassment or for pecuniary gain if the person discloses or threatens to disclose a private intimate image or intimate digital depiction without consent. The harassment offense now requires that the disclosure or threatened disclosure cause physical, emotional, or reputational harm to the depicted individual. Like the offenses for posting a private image in current law, disclosing a private intimate image or intimate digital depiction is a class 1 misdemeanor; except that the act increases the penalty to a class 6 felony if the person made the disclosure and the disclosure posed an imminent and serious threat to the safety of the depicted individual or the depicted individual's immediate family and the person knew or reasonably should have known of the imminent and serious threat. The act changes the offenses of posting, possessing, or exchanging a private image by a juvenile to the related offenses of disclosing, possessing, or exchanging a private intimate image or intimate digital depiction by a juvenile. The penalties remain the same. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
24 added · 17 removed24 line(s) added, 17 removed.
First Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO ENGROSSEDREENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
25-0709.02 Anna Petrini x5497 SENATE BILL 25-288 SENATE SPONSORSHIP Rodriguez, Bridges, Coleman, Cutter, Exum, Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, Michaelson Jenet, Mullica, Roberts, Snyder, Wallace HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Titone and Soper, Senate Committees House Committees Judiciary A BILL FOR AN ACT C ONCERNING PREVENTING CERTAIN DISCLOSURES OF INTIMATE DEPICTIONS , AND ,,IN IN CONNECTION THEREWITH ,CREATING, CREATING A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR NONCONSENSUAL DISCLOSURE OF AN INTIMATE DIGITAL DEPICTION AND ADDING AND AMENDING RELATED PROVISIONS IN CRIMINAL LAW .
e n Bill Summary m 2 T n 2 A U 9 (Note:
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does E i i notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill S a p R A passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that r applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at 3 http://leg.colorado.gov.) g The bill creates a cause of action against a person who discloses di a 5 or threatens to disclose a realistic visual depiction of another individual eE 2 T R 20 A n , N 2 82 Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
ES de ir Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n Ap Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
Dashese throughA (depicted individual) that has been created, altered, or produced by generative AI, image editing software, or computer-generated means (intimatedigitaldepiction).Adepictedindividualwhohassufferedharm fromthenonconsensualdisclosureorthreateneddisclosureofanintimate digital depiction has a cause of action against the wordsperson who disclosed orthreatenedtodisclosetheintimate digital depiction if thepersonknew or numbersacted indicatewith deletionsreckless fromdisregard existingfor law.whether the depicted individual:
e A A (depicted individual) that has been created, altered, or produced by generative AI, image editing software, or computer-generated means (intimatedigitaldepiction).Adepictedindividualwhohassufferedharm fromthenonconsensualdisclosureorthreateneddisclosureofanintimate digital depiction has a cause of action against the person who disclosed orthreatenedtodisclosetheintimate digital depiction if thepersonknew or acted with reckless disregard for whether the depicted individual:
View plain text versions (9)
- Engrossed Reengrossed (04/29/2025) pdf
- Engrossed Engrossed (04/28/2025) Current pdf
- Signed Act (06/02/2025) View text pdf
- Final Act (05/13/2025) View text pdf
- Rerevised (05/06/2025) View text pdf
- Revised (05/05/2025) View text pdf
- PA2 (05/03/2025) View text pdf
- PA1 (04/22/2025) View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced (04/09/2025) pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
-
Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 04/28/2025 - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
Sponsors
- Naquetta Ricks · Cosponsor
- Karen McCormick · Cosponsor
- William Lindstedt · Cosponsor
- Eliza Hamrick · Cosponsor
- Cecelia Espenoza · Cosponsor
- Monica Duran · Cosponsor
- Andrew Boesenecker · Cosponsor
- S. Bird · Cosponsor
- Katie Wallace · Cosponsor
- Marc Snyder · Cosponsor
- Dylan Roberts · Cosponsor
- Kyle Mullica · Cosponsor
- Cathy Kipp · Cosponsor
- Iman Jodeh · Cosponsor
- Nick Hinrichsen · Cosponsor
- Tony Exum · Cosponsor
- Lisa Cutter · Cosponsor
- James Coleman · Cosponsor
- Jeff Bridges · Cosponsor
- Matt Soper · Primary
- Brianna Titone · Primary
- Robert Rodriguez · Primary
- Michaelson Jenet · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 20 co-sponsors · 78 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Matt Soper Republican
- Brianna Titone Democrat
- Robert Rodriguez Democrat
Co-sponsors (20)
- Naquetta Ricks Democrat
- Karen McCormick Democrat
- William Lindstedt Democrat
- Eliza Hamrick Democrat
- Cecelia Espenoza Democrat
- Monica Duran Democrat
- Andrew Boesenecker Democrat
- S. Bird
- Katie Wallace Democrat
- Marc Snyder Democrat
- Dylan Roberts Democrat
- Kyle Mullica Democrat
- Cathy Kipp Democrat
- Iman Jodeh Democrat
- Nick Hinrichsen Democrat
- Tony Exum Democrat
- Lisa Cutter Democrat
- James Coleman Democrat
- Jeff Bridges Democrat
- Michaelson Jenet
Not signed on (78)
78 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 78 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 25-288 do?
- The act creates a cause of action against a person who discloses or threatens to disclose a highly realistic but false visual depiction of another individual (depicted individual) that has been created, altered, or produced by generative AI, image editing software, or computer-generated means and that depicts the intimate body parts of the depicted individual or certain sexual acts involving the depicted individual (intimate digital depiction). A depicted individual who has suffered harm from the nonconsensual disclosure or threatened disclosure of an intimate digital depiction has a cause of action against the person who disclosed or threatened to disclose the intimate digital depiction if the person knew or acted with reckless disregard for whether the depicted individual: Did not consent to the disclosure; Would experience severe emotional distress due to the disclosure or threatened disclosure; and Was identifiable. The act creates an exception to its civil liability provisions for a provider of the technology used to create an intimate digital depiction. Other exceptions include disclosures related to matters of public concern, parody, satire, and impersonation; disclosures made in good faith in various circumstances; and broadcasts of third-party content under certain conditions. A successful plaintiff may recover the defendant's monetary gain from the intimate digital depiction; either actual damages or liquidated damages of $150,000; exemplary damages; and litigation costs, including reasonable attorney fees. A court may also order the defendant to cease disclosure of the intimate digital depiction. In the context of the criminal law punishing sexual exploitation of a child, the act updates the definition of "sexually exploitative material" to include realistic computer-generated digital depictions that depict an identifiable child. The act changes the criminal offenses of posting a private image for harassment and posting a private image for pecuniary gain to the related offenses of disclosing a private intimate image or intimate digital depiction for the same purposes. A person who is eighteen years of age or older commits disclosure of a private intimate image or intimate digital depiction for harassment or for pecuniary gain if the person discloses or threatens to disclose a private intimate image or intimate digital depiction without consent. The harassment offense now requires that the disclosure or threatened disclosure cause physical, emotional, or reputational harm to the depicted individual. Like the offenses for posting a private image in current law, disclosing a private intimate image or intimate digital depiction is a class 1 misdemeanor; except that the act increases the penalty to a class 6 felony if the person made the disclosure and the disclosure posed an imminent and serious threat to the safety of the depicted individual or the depicted individual's immediate family and the person knew or reasonably should have known of the imminent and serious threat. The act changes the offenses of posting, possessing, or exchanging a private image by a juvenile to the related offenses of disclosing, possessing, or exchanging a private intimate image or intimate digital depiction by a juvenile. The penalties remain the same. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors SB 25-288?
- SB 25-288 is sponsored by Naquetta Ricks (Democrat), Karen McCormick (Democrat), William Lindstedt (Democrat), Eliza Hamrick (Democrat), Cecelia Espenoza (Democrat), Monica Duran (Democrat), Andrew Boesenecker (Democrat), S. Bird, Katie Wallace (Democrat), Marc Snyder (Democrat), Dylan Roberts (Democrat), Kyle Mullica (Democrat), Cathy Kipp (Democrat), Iman Jodeh (Democrat), Nick Hinrichsen (Democrat), Tony Exum (Democrat), Lisa Cutter (Democrat), James Coleman (Democrat), Jeff Bridges (Democrat), Matt Soper (Republican), Brianna Titone (Democrat), Robert Rodriguez (Democrat), and Michaelson Jenet.
- What is the current status of SB 25-288?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 09, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 25-288?
- Track SB 25-288 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 25-288
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 25-288
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →