Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 24-205 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 24-205.
You're tracking SB 24-205
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 24-205 — Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence
Last action — Governor Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 10, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on May 17, 2024.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
3 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 D).
-
Mixed recorded votes
7 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
On and after February 1, 2026, the act requires a developer of a high-risk artificial intelligence system (high-risk system) to use reasonable care to protect consumers from any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination in the high-risk system. There is a rebuttable presumption that a developer used reasonable care if the developer complied with specified provisions in the act, including: Making available to a deployer of the high-risk system a statement disclosing specified information about the high-risk system; Making available to a deployer of the high-risk system information and documentation necessary to complete an impact assessment of the high-risk system; Making a publicly available statement summarizing the types of high-risk systems that the developer has developed or intentionally and substantially modified and currently makes available to a deployer or other developer and how the developer manages any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination that may arise from the development or intentional and substantial modification of each of these high-risk systems; and Disclosing to the attorney general and known deployers or other developers of the high-risk system any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination, within 90 days after the discovery or receipt of a credible report from the deployer, that the high-risk system has caused or is reasonably likely to have caused. The act also, on and after February 1, 2026, requires a deployer of a high-risk system to use reasonable care to protect consumers from any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination in the high-risk system. There is a rebuttable presumption that a deployer used reasonable care if the deployer complied with specified provisions in the act, including: Implementing a risk management policy and program for the high-risk system; Completing an impact assessment of the high-risk system; Annually reviewing the deployment of each high-risk system deployed by the deployer to ensure that the high-risk system is not causing algorithmic discrimination; Notifying a consumer of specified items if the high-risk system makes, or will be a substantial factor in making, a consequential decision concerning the consumer; Providing a consumer with an opportunity to correct any incorrect personal data that a high-risk system processed in making a consequential decision; Providing a consumer with an opportunity to appeal, via human review if technically feasible, an adverse consequential decision concerning the consumer arising from the deployment of a high-risk system; Making a publicly available statement summarizing the types of high-risk systems that the deployer currently deploys, how the deployer manages any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination that may arise from deployment of each of these high-risk systems, and the nature, source, and extent of the information collected and used by the deployer; and Disclosing to the attorney general the discovery of algorithmic discrimination, within 90 days after the discovery, that the high-risk system has caused. A person doing business in this state, including a deployer or other developer, that deploys or makes available an artificial intelligence system that is intended to interact with consumers must ensure disclosure to each consumer who interacts with the artificial intelligence system that the consumer is interacting with an artificial intelligence system. The act does not restrict a developer's, deployer's, or other person's ability to engage in specified activities, including: Complying with federal, state, or municipal laws, ordinances, or regulations; Cooperating with and conducting specified investigations; Taking immediate steps to protect an interest that is essential for the life or physical safety of a consumer; Conducting and engaging in specified research activities; and Effectuating a product recall or repairing technical errors that impair product functionality. The act provides an affirmative defense for a developer, deployer, or other person if: The developer, deployer, or other person involved in a potential violation is in compliance with a nationally or internationally recognized risk management framework for artificial intelligence systems that the act or the attorney general designates; and The developer, deployer, or other person takes specified measures to discover and correct violations of the act. An insurer, a fraternal benefit society, or a developer of an artificial intelligence system used by an insurer is in full compliance with the act if the entity is subject to specified laws governing insurers' use of external consumer data and information sources, algorithms, and predictive models and rules adopted by the commissioner of insurance. A bank, out-of-state bank, credit union chartered by the state of Colorado, federal credit union, out-of-state credit union, or any affiliate or subsidiary thereof, is in full compliance with the act if the entity is subject to examination by a state or federal prudential regulator under any published guidance or regulations that apply to the use of high-risk systems and the guidance or regulations meet criteria specified in the act. The act grants the attorney general rule-making authority to implement, and exclusive authority to enforce, the requirements of the act. A person who violates the act engages in a deceptive trade practice pursuant to the "Colorado Consumer Protection Act". APPROVED by Governor May 17, 2024 EFFECTIVE May 17, 2024(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
552 added · 556 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to the bill include changes in how specific technologies related to artificial intelligence systems are listed. Some terms, such as "artificial intelligence-enabled video games," "databases," and "data storage," were restructured or removed. This change clarifies the focus areas of the consumer protections being addressed in interactions with artificial intelligence systems.
Second Regular Session Seventy-fourth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO ENGROSSEDREENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
24-0922.03 Josh Schultz x5486 SENATE BILL 24-205 SENATE SPONSORSHIP Rodriguez, HOUSECutter, SPONSORSHIPFenberg, (None),Michaelson SenateJenet, CommitteesPriola, HouseWinter CommitteesF. Judiciary A BILL FOR AN ACT C ONCERNING CONSUMER PROTECTIONS IN INTERACTIONS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS .
HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Titone and Rutinel, Senate Committees House Committees Judiciary A BILL FOR AN ACT C ONCERNING CONSUMER PROTECTIONS IN INTERACTIONS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS .
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill n passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that d E e 2 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at T d 2 http://leg.colorado.gov.) N 3 3 S e a n M The bill requires a developer of a high-risk artificial intelligence e system (high-risk system) to use reasonable care to avoid algorithmic A discrimination in the high-risk system.
There isarebuttablepresumption that a developer used reasonable care if the developer complied with g specified provisions in the bill, including:
di a ! Making available to a deployer of the high-risk system a eR 42 T Rd 02 AN n2 ,2 Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
ES de ya Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n M Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
(1) (a) "ALGORITHMIC DISCRIMINATION"MEANS ANY CONDITION ININWHICHTHEUSEOFANARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCESYSTEMRESULTSINAN WHICH THE USE OFAN ARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE SYSTEM MATERIALLY INCREASES THE RISK OF AN UNLAWFUL DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT OR IMPACT THAT DISFAVORS AN INDIVIDUALINDIVIDUALORGROUPOFINDIVIDUALSONTHEBASISOFTHEIRACTUALOR ORPERCEIVED GROUPAGE OF,COLOR INDIVIDUALS,DISABILIT,ETHNICITY,GENETIC ONINFORMATION THE, BASISLIMITED OFPROFICIENCY THEIRIN ACTUALTHE ORENGLISH PERCEIVEDLANGUAGE AGE ,COLOR , DISABILIT,NATIONAL ETHNICITYORIGIN, GENETICINFORMATIONRACE ,LIMITEDPROFICIENCYINTHE, ERELIGION,REPRODUCTIVE NGLISHHEALTH LANGUAGE, ,NATIONALORIGINSEX,VETERAN ,RACESTATUS ,RELIGION,REPRODUCTIVE,OR HEALTHOTHER ,CLASSIFICATION SEXPROTECTED VETERANSTATUSUNDER ,OROTHERCLASSIFICATIONPROTECTEDUNDERTHETHE LAWS OF THIS STATE OR FEDERAL LAW .
(6) NOTHINGINSUBSECTIONS(2)TO (5OFTHISSECTIONREQUIRES A DEVELOPER TO DISCLOSE A TRADE SECRETSECRET,OTHER CONFIDENTIAL OR OTHERPROPRIETARY CONFIDENTIALORINFORMATION PROPRIETARY,OR INFORMATION .THAT WOULD CREATE A SECURITY RISK TO THE DEVELOPE.
Deployer duty to avoid algorithmic discrimination -riskmanagementpolicyandprogram.(1) O NANDAFTER FEBRUARY 1,2026,A DEPLOYER OF A HIGHRISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM SHALLUSEREASONABLECARETOPROTECTCONSUMERSFROMANYKNOWN -13- 205 OR REASONABLY FORESEEABLE RISKS OFALGORITHMIC DISCRIMINATION.
-13- 205 INANYENFORCEMENTACTIONBROUGHTONORAFTER FEBRUARY 1,2026, BYTHE ATTORNEYGENERALPURSUANT TOSECTION 6-1-1606THERE ISA REBUTTABLEPRESUMPTIONTHATADEPLOYEROFAHIGH -RISKARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCESYSTEMUSEDREASONABLECAREASREQUIREDUNDERTHIS SECTION IF THE DEPLOYER COMPLIED WITH THIS SECTION AND ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OR OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RULES PROMULGATED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PURSUANT TO SECTION 6-1-1607.
(2) (a) ON AND AFTER FEBRUARY 1, 2026,AND EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (8)OF THIS SECTION, A DEPLOYER OF A HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM SHALL IMPLEMENT A RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROGRAM TO GOVERN THE DEPLOYER S DEPLOYMENT OF THE HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYST.SYST.THE RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROGRAM MUST SPECIFY AND INCORPORATE THE PRINCIPLES,PROCESSES,AND PERSONNEL THAT THE DEPLOYER USES TO IDENTIFY, DOCUMENT ,AND MITIGATE KNOWN OR REASONABLYFORESEEABLERISKSOFALGORITHMICDISCRIMINATION .THE RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROGRAM MUST BE AN ITERATIVE PROCESS PLANNED , IMPLEMENTED , AND REGULARLY AND SYSTEMATICALLY REVIEWED AND UPDATED OVER THE LIFE CYCLE OF A HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM, REQUIRING REGULAR , SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND UPDATES .
HE RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROGRAM MUST SPECIFY AND INCORPORATE THE PRINCIPLES,PROCESSES,AND PERSONNEL THAT THE DEPLOYER USES TO IDENTIFY, DOCUMENT ,AND MITIGATE KNOWN OR REASONABLYFORESEEABLERISKSOFALGORITHMICDISCRIMINATION .THE RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROGRAM MUST BE AN ITERATIVE PROCESS PLANNED , IMPLEMENTED , AND REGULARLY AND SYSTEMATICALLY REVIEWED AND UPDATED OVER THE LIFE CYCLE OF A HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM, REQUIRING REGULAR , SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND UPDATES .
(I)(A) TEGUIDANCEANDSTANDARDSSETFORTHINTHELATESTTHEGUIDANCEANDSTANDARDSSETFORTHINTHELATEST VERSION OF THE "ARTIFICIAL NTELLIGENCE R ISK MMANAGEMENT ANAGEMENT-14- 205 FRAMEWORK " PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS -14- 205 AND TECHNOLOGY IN THE UUNITED NITEDSTATESSTATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE , STANDARD ISO/IEC 42001OF THEINTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION , OR ANOTHER NATIONALLY OR INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS;OR (B) A NY RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCESYSTEMSTHATTHEATTORNEYGENERAL ,INTHEATTORNEY GENERAL S DISCRETION,MAY DESIGNATE;
(III) THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE HIGH RISK-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEPLOYED BY THE DEPLOYER ,INCLUDING THE INTENDED USES OF THE HIGHRISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM;
(b) A RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROGRAM IMPLEMENTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)(aOFTHISSECTIONMAY(2)(aOFTHIS COVERSECTIONMAYCOVERMULTIPLE MULTIPLE HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEPLOYED BY THE DEPLOYER .
(I) A DEPLOYER ,OR A THIRD PARTY CONTRACTED BY THE DEPLOYER ,THATDEPLOYSAHIGH RISKARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCESYSTEM ON OR AFTER FEBRUARY 1, 2026, SHALL COMPLETE AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORTHEFORTHEHIGH HIGH-RISKARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCESYSTEM-RISKARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE ;ANDSYSTEM;AND -15- 205 (II) OON AND AFTER FEBRUARY 1, 2026A2026,A DEPLOYERDEPLOYER,OR ,OR A THIRD -15- 205 PARTY CONTRACTED BY THE DEPLOYER ,SHALL COMPLETE AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR A DEPLOYED HIGH -RISKRISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM AT LEAST ANNUALLY AND WITHIN NINETY DAYS AFTER ANY INTENTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO THE HIGH -RISKRISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM IS MADE AVAILABL.
(I) A STATEMENT BY THE DEPLOYER DISCLOSING THE PURPOSE , INTENDED USE CASES ,AND, AND DEPLOYMENT CONTEXT OF ,AND, AND BENEFITS AFFORDED BY ,THE HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYST;MSYSTE; (II) AN ANALYSIS OF WHETHER THE DEPLOYMENT OF THE HIGH RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM POSES ANY KNOWN OR REASONABLYFORESEEABLERISKSOFALGORITHMICDISCRIMINATIONAND , IFSO,THE NATURE OFTHEALGORITHMICDISCRIMINATIONANDTHE STEPS THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO MITIGATE THE RISKS;
(III)(II) ADESCRIPTIONAN ANALYSIS OF WHETHER THE CATEGORIESDEPLOYMENT OF DATA THE HI-RISKHIGH RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM PROCESSESPOSES ASANY INPUTSKNOWN ANDOR THEREASONABLYFORESEEABLERISKSOFALGORITHMICDISCRIMINATIONAND OUTPUTS, THEIFSO,THE HIGH-RISKNATURE ARTIFICIALOFTHEALGORITHMICDISCRIMINATIONANDTHE INTELLIGENCESTEPS SYSTEMTHAT PRODUCE;HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO MITIGATE THE RISKS;
(IV)(III) IFADESCRIPTION OF THE DEPLOYERCATEGORIES USEDOF DATA TO CUSTOMIZE THE HIG-RISKHIGRISK ARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCEARTIFICIAL SYSTEM,ANOVERVIEWOFTHEINTELLIGENCE CATEGORIESOFSYSTEM DATAPROCESSES THEAS DEPLOYERINPUTS USEDAND TOTHE CUSTOMIZEOUTPUTS THE HIGH RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ;PRODUCES;
(V)(IV) AIF NYTHE METRICSDEPLOYER USED DATA TO EVALUATECUSTOMIZE THE PERFORMANCEHIGHRISK ANDARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE KNOWNSYSTEM LIMITATIONSANOVERVIEWOFTHE OFCATEGORIESOF DATA THE DEPLOYER USED TO CUSTOMIZE THE HIGH RISK-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ;
(VI)(V) A DESCRIPTIONNY OFMETRICS ANYUSED TRANSPARENCYTO MEASURESEVALUATE TAKEN -16- 205 CONCERNING THE HIGH-RISKPERFORMANCE ARTIFICIALAND INTELLIGENCEKNOWN SYSTEM,LIMITATIONS INCLUDINGANYMEASURESTAKENTODISCLOSETOACONSUMERTHATTHE HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM IS IN USE WHEN THE HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM IS IN;AND (VII) ADESCRIPTIONOFTHEPOST -DEPLOYMENTMONITORINGAND USER SAFEGUARDS PROVIDED CONCERNING THE HIGH -RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM,INCLUDING THE OVERSIGHT,USE,AND LEARNING PROCESS ESTABLISHED BY THE DEPLOYER TO ADDRESS ISSUES ARISING FROM THE DEPLOYMENT OF THE HIGH -RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM .;
(c)-16- IN205 ADDITION(VI) TOA THEDESCRIPTION INFORMATIONOF REQUIREDANY UNDERTRANSPARENCY SUBSECTIONMEASURES (3)(bOFTHISSECTIONTAKEN ANIMPACTASSESSMENTCOMPLETEDCONCERNING PURSUANTTHE TOHIGH-RISK THISARTIFICIAL SUBSECTIONINTELLIGENCE (3)FOLLOWINGSYSTEM, ANINCLUDINGANYMEASURESTAKENTODISCLOSETOACONSUMERTHATTHE INTENTIONALHIGH-RISK ANDARTIFICIAL SUBSTANTIALINTELLIGENCE MODIFICATIONSYSTEM TOIS AIN USE WHEN THE HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ONIS ORIN;AND AFTER(VII) FEBRUARYADESCRIPTIONOFTHEPOST 1,DEPLOYMENTMONITORINGAND 2026MUSTUSER INCLUDESAFEGUARDS APROVIDED STATEMENTCONCERNING DISCLOSING THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE HIGH -RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMSYSTEM,INCLUDING WASTHE USEDOVERSIGHT,USE,AND INLEARNING APROCESS MANNERESTABLISHED THATBY WASTHE CONSISTENTDEPLOYER WITHTO ,ORADDRESS VARIEDISSUES ARISING FROM ,THETHE DEVELOPERDEPLOYMENT 'S INTENDED USES OF THE HIGH-RISKHIGH ARTIFICIAL-RISK INTELLIGENCE SYST.M (d) ASINGLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT MAY ADDRESS ACOMPARABLE SET OF HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMSSYSTEM DEPLOYED BY A DEPLOYER .
(e)(c) IFIN ADDITION TO THE INFORMATION REQUIRED UNDER SUBSECTION (3)(bOFTHISSECTION ANIMPACTASSESSMENTCOMPLETED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (3)FOLLOWING AN INTENTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO A DEPLOYER,HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ON OR AFTER FEBRUARY 1, 2026MUST INCLUDE A THIRDSTATEMENT PARTYDISCLOSING CONTRACTEDTHE BYEXTENT TO WHICH THE DEPLOYERHIGH ,COMPLETES-RISK ANARTIFICIAL IMPACTINTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENTSYSTEM FORWAS THEUSED PURPOSEIN OFA COMPLYINGMANNER THAT WAS CONSISTENT WITH ANOTHER,OR APPLICABLEVARIED LAWFROM OR,THE REGULATIONDEVELOPER ,'S INTENDED USES OF THE IMPACTASSESSMENTSATISFIESTHEREQUIREMENTSESTABLISHEDINTHISHIGH-RISK SUBSECTIONARTIFICIAL (3)IFINTELLIGENCE THESYST.M (d) ASINGLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ISMAY REASONABLYADDRESS SIMILARA INCOMPARABLE -17-SET 205OF SCOPEANDEFFECTTOTHEIMPACTASSESSMENTTHATWOULDOTHERWISEHIGH-RISK BEARTIFICIAL COMPLETEDINTELLIGENCE PURSUANTSYSTEMS TODEPLOYED THISBY SUBSECTION(3).A DEPLOYER .
(e) IF A DEPLOYER ,OR A THIRD PARTY CONTRACTED BY THE DEPLOYER ,COMPLETES AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH ANOTHER APPLICABLE LAW OR REGULATION , THE IMPACTASSESSMENTSATISFIESTHEREQUIREMENTSESTABLISHEDINTHIS -17- 205 SUBSECTION (3)IF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT IS REASONABLY SIMILAR IN SCOPEANDEFFECTTOTHEIMPACTASSESSMENTTHATWOULDOTHERWISE BE COMPLETED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION(3).
(4) (a) O AND AFTER FEBRUARY 1, 2026AND NO LATER THAN THE TIME THAT A DEPLOYER DEPLOYS A HIGH -RISKRISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM TO MAKE ,OR, OR BE A SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR IN MAKING ,A CONSEQUENTIAL DECISION CONCERNING A CONSUMER , THE DEPLOYER SHALL :
(I) NOTIFYTHE CONSUMERTHATTHEDEPLOYERHASDEPLOYEDA HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM TO MAKE ,,OR OR BE A SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR IN MAKING ,A CONSEQUENTIAL DECISION BEFORE THE DECISION IS MAD;
(II) POVIDE TO THE CONSUMER A STATEMENT DISCLOSING THE PURPOSE OF THE HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM AND THE NATURE OF THE CONSEQUENTIAL DECISION;THE CONTACT INFORMATION FOR THE DEPLOYER ;A DESCRIPTION ,IN PLAIN LANGUAGE ,OF THE -18- 205 HIGH-RISKARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCESYSTEMFOR ;ANDINSTRUCTIONSONHOW TO ACCESS THE STATEMENTDEPLOYER REQUIRED; BY SUBSECTION (5)(a)OF THIS SECTION;
A DESCRIPTION, IN PLAIN LANGUAGE , OF THE HIGH-RISKARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCESYSTEM ;ANDINSTRUCTIONSONHOW TO ACCESS THE STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION (5)(a)OF THIS SECTION;
(b) O N AND AFTER FEBRUARY 1, 2026,A2026A DEPLOYER THAT HAS DEPLOYED A HIGH RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM TO MAK,OR BE A SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR IN MAKING ,A CONSEQUENTIAL DECISION CONCERNING A CONSUMER SHALL , IF THE CONSEQUENTIAL DECISION IS ADVERSE TO THE CONSUMER PROVIDE TO THE CONSUMER :
(B) THEDATATHATWASPROCESSEDBYTHEHIGHTHE -RISKARTIFICIALTYPE OF DATA THAT WAS PROCESSED BY THE HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM IN MAKING THE CONSEQUENTIAL DECISION;AND (C) T HE SOURCE OR SOURCES OF THE DATA DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (4)(b)(I)(BOF THIS SECTIO;
(II) AN OPPORTUNITY TO CORRECT ANY INCORRECT PERSONAL DATATHATTHEHIGH -RISKARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCESYSTEMPROCESSED -19- 205 IN MAKING , OR AS A SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR IN MAKING , THE CONSEQUENTIAL DECISION ;AND -19- 205 (III) AN OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAL AN ADVERSE CONSEQUENTIAL DECISION CONCERNING THE CONSUMER ARISING FROM THE DEPLOYMENT OFA HIGH -RISK ARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE SYSTE,WHICHAPPEALMUST , IFTECHNICALLYFEASIBLE ALLOWFORHUMANREVIEWUNLESSPROVIDING,ALLOWFORHUMANREVIEWUNLESSPROVIDING THE OPPORTUNITY FOR APPEAL IS NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CONSUMER ,INCLUDING IN INSTANCES IN WHICH ANY DELAY MIGHT POSE A RISK TO THE LIFE OR SAFETY OF SUCH CONSUME.
(c) (I) THEEXCEPT CONSUMERAS ,PROVIDED BASED ON THE INFORMATION IN THE STATEMENT PROVIDED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (4)(b)(I)OF(4)(c)(IOF THIS SECTION ,BEARSADEPLOYERSHALLPROVIDETHENOTICE THE,STATEMENT BURDEN,CONTACT OFINFORMATION DEMONSTRATING,AND THATDESCRIPTION THEREREQUIRED WASBY ASUBSECTIONS MATERIAL(4)(aAND ERROR(4)(b)OF OR OMISSION WARRANTING HUMAN REVIEW PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (4)(b)(IIIOF THIS SECTIO.SECTIO:
(II) A DEPLOYER THAT HAS DEPLOYED A HIGH -RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM TO MAKE , OR BE A SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR IN MAKING ,A CONSEQUENTIAL DECISION CONCERNING A CONSUMER MAY CONTRACTUALLY AGREE TO HAVE A DEVELOPER PROVIDE THE NOTICES AND DISCLOSURES TO AND CONDUCT THE APPEAL PROCESS REQUIRED BY THIS SUBSECTION (4)FOR CONSUMERS .
(d) (I) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (4)(d)(IIOF THIS SECTION ,ADEPLOYERSHALLPROVIDETHENOTICE STATEMENT ,CONTACT INFORMATION AND DESCRIPTION REQUIRED BY SUBSECTIONS (4)(aAND (4)(b)OF THIS SECTIO:
(C) INI ALL LANGUAGES IN WHICH THE DEPLOYER ,IN, IN THE ORDINARYCOURSE OFTHE DEPLOYER 'SBUSINESS,PROVIDESCONTRACTSSBUSINESS ,PROVIDESCONTRACTS , DISCLAIMERS ,SALE ANNOUNCEMENTS ,,AND AND OTHER INFORMATION TO -20- 205 CONSUMERS ;AND (D) I N A FORMAT THAT IS ACCESSIBLE TO CONSUMERS WITH DISABILITIE.
(II) IF THE DEPLOYER IS UNABLE TO PROVIDE THE NOTICE , STATEMENT ,,CONTACT CONTACT INFORMATION ,,AND AND DESCRIPTION REQUIRED BY SUBSECTIONS (4)(a)AND (4)(b)OF THIS SECTION DIRECTLY TO THE CONSUMER ,THE, THE DEPLOYER SHALL MAKE THE NOTICE ,,STATEMENT STATEMENT , CONTACTINFORMATION ,ANDDESCRIPTIONAVAILABLEINAMANNERTHAT ISREASONABLYCALCULATEDTOENSURE THATTHECONSUMERRECEIVES -20- 205 THE NOTICE,STATEMENT ,CONTACT INFORMATION ,AND DESCRIPTION.DESCRIPTION .
(5) (a) O N AND AFTER FEBRUARY 1, 2026,AND EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION(6)OFSUBSECTION (6OF THIS SECTIO,A DEPLOYER SHALLMAKE AVAILABLE ,INAMANNERTHATISCLEARANDREADILYAVAILABLEONTHE DEPLOYER 'S WEBSIT,AWEBSITE,A STATEMENT SUMMARIZING :
(I) THE TYPES OF HIG-RISKHIGHRISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS THAT ARE CURRENTLY DEPLOYED BY THE DEPLOYER ;
Show all 99 changed lines (59 more)
(II) H OW THE DEPLOYER MANAGES KNOWN OR REASONABLY FORESEEABLE RISKS OF ALGORITHMIC DISCRIMINATION THAT MAY ARISE FROM THE DEPLOYMENT OF EACH HIGH -RISKRISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMDESCRIBEDPURSUANTTOSUBSECTION (5)(a)(OFTHISSECTION(5)(a)(IOFTHISSECTION ;
AND (III) IIN DETAILDETAIL, ,THETHE NATURE ,,SOURCE SOURCE,,AND AND EXTENT OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTED AND USED BY THE DEPLOYER .
(b) A DEPLOYER SHALL PERIODICALLY UPDATE THE STATEMENT DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION(5)(a)OFSUBSECTION (5)(aOF THIS SECTIO.
(6) SUBSECTIONSS UBSECTIONS (2) AND (3)OF(3) OF THIS SECTION AND THIS SUBSECTION (6)DO NOT APPLY TO A DEPLOYER IF ,AT, AT THE TIME THE -21- 205 DEPLOYER DEPLOYS A HIGH-RISKHIGH RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM AND AT ALLTIMES WHILE THE HIGHRISKHIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM IS DEPLOYED :
(I) E MPLOYS FEWER THAN FIFTY FULL -TIME EQUIVALENT EMPLOYEES ;AND; (II) DOES NOT USE THE DEPLOYER 'S OWN DATA TO TRAIN THE HIGH RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTE;
(b)AND THE(II) HIGH-RISKDOES ARTIFICIALNOT INTELLIGENCEUSE SYST:M (I) I USED FOR THE INTENDED USES THAT ARE DISCLOSED TO THE DEPLOYER AS'S REQUIREDOWN BY SECTION 6-1-1602 (2)(aAND (II) C ONTINUES LEARNING BASED ON DATA DERIVEDTO FROMTRAIN SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DEPLOYERHIGH 'SRISK OWNARTIFICIAL DATA;ANDINTELLIGENCE (c)SYSTE; THEDEPLOYERMAKESAVAILABLETOCONSUMERSANYIMPACT ASSESSMENT THAT :
(I)(b) THE DEVELOPERHIGH-RISK OF THE HIG-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMSYSTE: HAS COMPLETED AND PROVIDED TO THE DEPLOYER ;AND (II) ICLUDESINFORMATIONTHAT ISSUBSTANTIALLYSIMILARTO THE INFORMATION IN THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REQUIRED UNDER SUBSECTION (3)(b)OF THIS SECTIO.
(7)-21- IADEPLOYERDEPLOYSAHIGH205 -RISKARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE(I) SYSTEMONORAFTERS FEBRUARYUSED 1,2026,ANDSUBSEQUENTLYDISCOVERSFOR THAT THE HIGHINTENDED -RISKUSES ARTIFICIALTHAT INTELLIGENCEARE SYSTEMDISCLOSED HASTO CAUSEDTHE ALGORITHMICDISCRIMINATIONDEPLOYER ,THEDEPLOYERAS ,WITHOUTUNREASONABLEREQUIRED DELAYBY ,BUTSECTION6-1-1602 NO(2)(aAND LATER(II) THANCONTINUES NINETYLEARNING DAYSBASED AFTERON THEDATA DATEDERIVED OFFROM THESOURCES DISCOVERYOTHER ,SHALLTHAN SEND TO THE ATTORNEYDEPLOYER GENERALS ,INOWN ADATA;AND FORM(c) ANDTEDEPLOYERMAKESAVAILABLETOCONSUMERSANYIMPACT MANNERPRESCRIBEDBYTHEASSESSMENT ATTORNEYGENERALTHAT ,ANOTICE: DISCLOSING -22- 205 THE DISCOVERY.
(I) TE DEVELOPER OF THE HIGHRISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM HAS COMPLETED AND PROVIDED TO THE DEPLOYER;AND (II) ILUDESINFORMATIONTHAT ISSUBSTANTIALLYSIMILARTO THE INFORMATION IN THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REQUIRED UNDER SUBSECTION (3)(bOF THIS SECTIO.
(7) FADEPLOYERDEPLOYSAHIGH -RISKARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE SYSTEMONORAFTER FEBRUARY 1,2026,ANDSUBSEQUENTLYDISCOVERS THAT THE HIGH RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM HAS CAUSED ALGORITHMICDISCRIMINATION,THEDEPLOYER ,WITHOUTUNREASONABLE DELAY ,BUT NO LATER THAN NINETY DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE DISCOVERY ,SHALL SEND TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ,IN A FORM AND MANNERPRESCRIBEDBYTHE ATTORNEYGENERAL ,ANOTICE DISCLOSING THE DISCOVERY.
(9) ON AND AFTERF EBRUARY 1, 2026THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAYREQUIRETHATADEPLOYER ,ORATHIRDPARTYCONTRACTEDBYTHE DEPLOYER ,DISCLOSE TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL , IN A FORM AND MANNER PRESCRIBED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL , THE RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY IMPLEMENTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)OF -22- 205 THIS SECTION, THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT COMPLETED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (3)OF THIS SECTION , OR THE RECORDS MAINTAINED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (3)(fOF THIS SECTION.
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY EVALUATE THE RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY , IMPACT ASSESSMENT ,OR RECORDS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PART16, ANDTHERISKMANAGEMENTPOLICY ,IMPACTASSESSMENT ,ANDRECORDS ARENOTSUBJECTTODISCLOSUREUNDERTHE "COLORADO O PENR ECORDS A CT",PART2 OFARTICLE72 OF TITL24.INARTICL72 OFTITLE24.IN A DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION(9),A DEPLOYER MAY DESIGNATE THE STATEMENT OR DOCUMENTATIONASINCLUDINGPROPRIETARYINFORMATIONORATRADE SECRET.TOTHEEXTENTTHATANYINFORMATIONCONTAINEDINTHERISK MANAGEMENT POLICY , IMPACT ASSESSMENT , OR RECORDS INCLUDE INFORMATION SUBJECT TO ATTORNEY -CLIENTCLIENT PRIVILEGE OR WORK -PRODUCT PROTECTION,THE DISCLOSURE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF THE PRIVILEGE OR PROTECTIO.
(1) O N AND AFTER FEBRUARY 1, 2026AND EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION(2)OF THIS SECTIO,SECTION,A A DEPLOYER OR OTHER -23- 205 DEVELOPER THAT DEPLOYS ,OFFERS,SELLS,LEASES,LICENSES,GIVES,OR,OFFERS,SELL,LEASES,LICENSES,GIVES,OR OTHERWISE MAKES AVAILABLE AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM THAT IS INTENDED TO INTERACT WITH CONSUMERS SHALL ENSURE THE DISCLOSURE TO EACH CONSUMER WHO INTERACTS WITH THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM THAT THE CONSUMER IS INTERACTING WITH AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM.SYSTE.
(2) DISCLOSURE ISNOT REQUIREDUNDERSUBSECTION (1OFTHIS(1)OFTHIS SECTION UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT WOULD BE OBVIOUS TO A REASONABLEPERSONTHATTHEPERSONISINTERACTINGWITHAHIGH -RISKRISK -23- 205 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM.
(1) OTHINGNHING IN THIS PAR16PART16RESTRICTS RESTRICTS A DEVELOPER'S,ADEVELOPER S,A DEPLOYER 'S,OR OTHER PERSONPERSON'S S ABILITY T:
(a) COMPLYC OMPLY WITH FEDERAL , STATE,STATE OR,OR MUNICIPAL LAWS , ORDINANCES ,OR REGULATIONS ;
(b) CCOMPLY OMPLY WITH A CIVI,CRIMINALCIVIL,CRIMINAL,OR ,OR REGULATORY INQUIRY , INVESTIGATION ,SUBPOENA ,,OR OR SUMMONS BY A FEDERAL ,,A ASTATE STATE,,A A MUNICIPAL ,OR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY ;
(c) COOPERATEWITHALAWENFORCEMENTAGENCYCONCERNING CONDUCT OR ACTIVITY THAT THE DEVELOPER ,DEPLOYER , ORDEPLOYER ,OR OTHER PERSON REASONABLY AND IN GOOD FAITH BELIEVES MAY VIOLATE FEDERAL ,STATE,STATE,OR ,OR MUNICIPAL LAWS,ORDINANCESLAWS OR,ORDINANCES ,OR REGULATIONS ;
(d) IVESTIGATE ,ESTABLISH,EXERCISE,ESTABLISH,EXERCISE,PREPAREFOR PREPAREFOR,ORDEFEND ORDEFEND LEGAL CLAIMS ;
-24- 205 (f) BYANYMEANSOTHERBYANYMEANSOTHERTHANTHE THAN THE USE OFFACIALRECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY ,PREVENT ,DETECT, ,PROTECTDETECT, PROTECT AGAINST ,OR RESPOND TO SECURITYINCIDENTS ,IDENTITYTHEFT,FRAUD,IDENTITYTHEFT FRAUD ,HARASSMENT ,MALICIOUS OR DECEPTIVE ACTIVITIE,OR ILLEGAL ACTIVIT;INVESTIGATE,REPORTACTIVITY;INVESTIGATE,REPORT , OR PROSECUTE THE PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY SUCH ACTION ;OR PRESERVE THE INTEGRITY OR SECURITY OF SYSTEM;SYSTEMS;
(g) EENGAGE NGAGE IN PUBLIC OR PEER -REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC OR STATISTICAL RESEARCH IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST THAT ADHERES TO ALL OTHER APPLICABLE ETHICS AND PRIVACY LAWS AND IS CONDUCTED IN -24- 205 ACCORDANCE WITH 45 CFR 46, AS AMENDED , OR RELEVANT REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE FEDERAL FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION ;
(h) CONDUCTRESEARCH ,TESTINGANDDEVELOPMENTACTIVITIES,TESTING,ANDDEVELOPMENTACTIVITIES REGARDINGANARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCESYSTEMORMODEL ,OTHERTHANOTHERTHAN TESTING CONDUCTED UNDER REAL -WORLDWORLD CONDITIONS ,,BEFORE BEFORE THE ARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCESYSTEMORMODELISPLACEDONTHE MARKET , DEPLOYED ,OR PUT INTO SERVIC,AS APPLICABLE;OR (i) ASSIST ANOTHER DEVELOPERDEVELOPER,DEPLOYER ,DEPLOYER ,OR OTHER PERSON WITH ANY OF THE OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED UNDER THIS PART16.PAR16.
(2) THE OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED ON DEVELOPERS,DEPLOYERS ,OROR OTHERPERSONSUNDERTHISPART 1616DONOT DONOTRESTRICTRESTRICT ADEVELOPER S,A'S,A DEPLOYER ',ORS,OR OTHER PERSON S ABILITY T:
(a) EFFECTUATE A PRODUCT RECALLRECALL;OR ;OR (b) IDENTIFYIENTIFY AND REPAIR TECHNICAL ERRORS THAT IMPAIR EXISTING OR INTENDED FUNCTIONALITY.
(3) THE OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED ON DEVELOPERS,DEPLOYERS ,OROR OTHER PERSONS UNDER THIS PART16PART16DONOT DONOT APPLY WHERE COMPLIANCE -25- 205 WITH THIS PART 1616BY BY THE DEVELOPER,DEVELOPER DEPLOYER,,DEPLOYER OR,OR OTHER PERSON WOULD VIOLATE AN EVIDENTIARY PRIVILEGE UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS STATE .
(4) N OTHING IN THIS PART16PART16IMPOSES IMPOSES ANY OBLIGATION ON A DEVELOPER ,A DEPLOYERDEPLOYER,OR ,OR OTHER PERSON THAT ADVERSELY AFFECTS THE RIGHTS OR FREEDOMS OF A PERSON ,INCLUDING THE RIGHTS OF A PERSON TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS THAT ARE GUARANTEED IN :
(a) THEFIRSTAMENDMENTTOTHETEFIRSTAMENDMENTTOTHE UUNITED NITEDSTATESCONSTITUTIONSTATESCONSTITUTION; ;
-25- 205 OR (b) SECTIONSECTION10 10OFOF ARTICLEIIOF THE STATE CONSTITUTION.CONSTITUTIO.
(5) N OTHING IN THIS PART 16 APPLIES TO A DEVELOPERDEVELOPER, ,AA DEPLOYER ,OR OTHER PERSONPERSON: :
(a) INSOFARISOFAR AS THE DEVELOPER ,DEPLOYER ,OR OTHER PERSON DEVELOPS ,DEPLOYS , DEPLOYS, PUTS INTO SERVICESERVICE, ,OROR INTENTIONALLY AND SUBSTANTIALLY MODIFIES ,,AS AS APPLICABLE, A HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMSYSTEM: :
(I) TATHASBEENAPPROVED ,AUTHORIZEDAUTHORIZED ,CERTIFIE,CLEARED , OR GRANTED BY A FEDERAL AGENCY ,SUCH AS THE FEDERAL FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION OR THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION , ACTING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE FEDERAL AGENCYSAGENCS AUTHORITY;AUTHORITY;OR (II) IOMPLIANCEWITHSTANDARDSESTABLISHEDBYAFEDERAL AGENCY ,INCLUDING STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE FEDERAL OFFICE OF THE NATIONAL COORDINATOR FOR HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ;
OR(b) (II)CONDUCTING IOMPLIANCEWITHSTANDARDSESTABLISHEDBYAFEDERALRESEARCH AGENCYTO ,INCLUDINGSUPPORT STANDARDSAN ESTABLISHEDAPPLICATION BYFOR APPROVAL OR CERTIFICATION FROM A FEDERAL AGENC,INCLUDING THE FEDERAL OFFICEAVIATION OFADMINISTRATION ,THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ,OR THE NATIONALFEDERAL COORDINATORFOOD FORAND HEALTHDRUG INFORMATIONADMINISTRATION TECHNOLOGYOR ;RESEARCH TO SUPPORT AN APPLICATION OTHERWISE SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE FEDERAL AGENCY;
(b)(c) CP ONDUCTINGERFORMING RESEARCHWORK TOUNDER SUPPORT,OR ANIN APPLICATIONCONNECTION FORWITH APPROVAL, ORA CERTIFICATIONCONTRACT FROMWITH ATHE FEDERALU AGENCY,INCLUDINGNITEDSTATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ,THE U NITED S TATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , OR THE -26-NATIONAL 205AERONAUTICS FEDERALAND AVIATIONSPACE ADMINISTRATION ,THE,UNLESS FEDERALTHE COMMUNICATIONSDEVELOPER COMMISSION, DEPLOYER ,OR OTHER PERSON IS PERFORMING THE FEDERALWORK FOODON ANDA DRUGHIRISK ADMINISTRATION-26- OR205 RESEARCHARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM THAT IS USED TO SUPPORTMAKE AN,OR APPLICATIONIS OTHERWISEA SUBJECTSUBSTANTIALFACTORINMAKING TO,ADECISIONCONCERNINGEMPLOYMENT REVIEWOR BYHOUSING;OR (d) THAT IS A COVERED ENTITY WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE FEDERAL AGENCY;"HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITYAND A CCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1996", 42 U.S.CSECS.
(c) P ERFORMING WORK UNDER ,OR IN CONNECTION WITH , A CONTRACT WITH THE U NITEDSTATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ,THE U NITED S TATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , OR THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION ,UNLESS THE DEVELOPER , DEPLOYER ,OR OTHER PERSON IS PERFORMING THE WORK ON A HIRISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM THAT IS USED TO MAKE ,OR IS A SUBSTANTIALFACTORINMAKING ,ADECISIONCONCERNINGEMPLOYMENT OR HOUSING;OR (d) THAT IS A COVERED ENTITY WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE FEDERAL "HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITYAND A CCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1996", 42 U.S.CSECS.
(I) ARE GENERATED BY AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYST;M (II) REQUIRE A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER TO TAKE ACTION TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS ;AND (III) AE NOT CONSIDERED TO BE HIGH RI.K (6) NOTHING IN THIS PART 16 APPLIES TO ANY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM THAT IS ACQUIRED BY OR FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENTORANYFEDERALAGENCYORDEPARTMENT INCLUDINGTHE,INCLUDINGTHE U NITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE , THE U NITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ,OR THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE -27- 205 ADMINISTRATION ,UNLESS THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM IS A HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM THAT IS USED TO MORE,ORE IS A SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR IN MAKING , A DECISION CONCERNING EMPLOYMENT OR HOUSING .
(7) A N INSURERINSURER, ,ASAS DEFINED IN SECTIONSECTION10-1-102 10-1-102(13),OR (13)OR FRATERNAL BENEFIT SOCIETY,AS DEFINED IN SECTION10-14-102,ISSECTION10-14-102IS IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PART 16 IF THE INSURER OR FRATERNAL BENEFIT SOCIETY HAS IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINS A WRITTEN ARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE SYSTEMSSYSTEMSPROGRAMIN PROGRAM IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL -27- 205 REQUIREMENTSESTABLISHEDBYTHE COMMISSIONEROFINSURANCE AND THE REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE ARE SUBSTANTIALLY EQUIVALENT OR MORE STRINGENT THAN THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PART16.PART 16.
(8) (a) AANKABANK ,OUT,OUT-OF-STATE OF-STATE BANK CREDIT,CREDIT UNION CHARTERED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO ,FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,UNION OUT-OF-STATE,OUT OF STATE CREDIT UNION,ORUNION ,OR ANY AFFILIATE OR SUBSIDIARY THEREOF,ISTHEREOF ,IS IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PART 16 IF THE BANK,OUTBANK, -OFSTATEOUT-OF-STATE BANK , CREDITUNIONCHARTEREDBYTHESTATEOF COLORADO ,FEDERALCREDIT UNION ,OUT-OF-STATE,OUT -OFSTATE CREDIT UNION,ORUNION ,OR AFFILIATE OR SUBSIDIARY IS SUBJECT TO EXAMINATION BY A STATE OR FEDERAL PRUDENTIAL REGULATOR UNDER ANY PUBLISHED GUIDANCE OR REGULATIONS THAT APPLY TO THE USE OFHIG-RISKARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCEOFHIGH-RISKARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS AND THE GUIDANCE OR REGULATIONS :
(I) IPOSEREQUIREMENTSTHATARESUBSTANTIALLYEQUIVALENT TO OR MORE STRINGENT THAN THE REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED IN THIS PART 16;AND16; (II) AT A MINIMUM ,REQUIRE THE BANK, OUT-OF-STATE BANK, -28- 205 CREDITUNIONCHARTEREDBYTHESTATEOF COLORADO ,FEDERALCREDIT UNION,OUT -OF-STATE CREDIT UNION,OR AFFILIATE OR SUBSIDIARY TO:
(A) R EGULARLY AUDIT THE BANK 'S,OUT -OF-STATE BANK 'S, CREDIT UNION CHARTERED BY THE STATE OF C OLORADO 'S,FEDERAL CREDIT UNION S, OUT-OF-STATE CREDIT UNION S, OR AFFILIATE'S OR SUBSIDIARY'S USE OF HIG-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERALANTIDISCRIMINATION(II) LAWSAT ANDA REGULATIONSMINIMUM APPLICABLE, TOREQUIRE THE BANK ,OUT OF STATE BANK ,CREDIT, UNIONCHARTEREDBYTHESTATEOFCREDITUNIONCHARTEREDBYTHESTATEOF CCOLORADO OLORADO,FEDERALCREDIT ,FEDERALCREDITUNIONUNION ,,OUT OUT-OF-STATEOF-STATE CREDIT UNION,OR AFFILIATE OR SUBSIDIARY;ANDSUBSIDIARY (B)T: MITIGATEANYALGORITHMICDISCRIMINATIONCAUSEDBYTHE USE OF A HIG-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM OR ANY RISK OF ALGORITHMIC DISCRIMINATION THAT IS REASONABLY FORESEEABLE AS A RESULT OF THE USE OF A HIG-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTE.
(b)(A) REGULARLY AUDIT THE BANK 'S,OUT -OF-STATE BANK S, CREDIT UNION CHARTERED BY THE STATE OF C OLORADO 'S,FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 'S,OUT -OFSTATE CREDIT UNION S, OR AFFILIATES OR SUBSIDIARY S USE OF HIG-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERALANTIDISCRIMINATION LAWS AND REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE BANK ,OUT -OFSTATE BANK , CREDIT UNIONCHARTEREDBYTHESTATEOF C OLORADO ,FEDERALCREDITUNION , -28- 205 OUT -OF-STATE CREDIT UNION,OR AFFILIATE OR SUBSIDIAR;AND (B) M ITIGATEANYALGORITHMICDISCRIMINATIONCAUSEDBYTHE USE OF A HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM OR ANY RISK OF ALGORITHMIC DISCRIMINATION THAT IS REASONABLY FORESEEABLE AS USEDA INRESULT THISOF SUBSECTION(8):THE USE OF A HIG-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTE.
(I)(b) "AA FFILIATE"S HASUSED THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTIONTHIS 11-101-401(3.5).SUBSECTIO(8):
(II)(I) "BNK"A "HASTHEMEANINGSETFORTHINSECTIONFFILIAT" HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION 11-101-401 (5).(3.5).
(III)(II) "CEDIT"BANK" UNIONHASTHEMEANINGSETFORTHINSECTION "HAS11-101-401 THE(5). MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION 11-30-101 (1)(a).
(IV)(III) "O"CREDIT UT-OF-STATEUNION" BANK " HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION11-101-401SECTION (50).11-30-101 (1)(a).
(9)(IV) I"O AUT DEVELOPER,AOF DEPLOYERSTATE ,ORBANK OTHER"HAS PERSON ENGAGES IN ANACTIONPURSUANTTOANEXEMPTIONSETFORTHINTHISSECTION ,THE DEVELOPER , DEPLOYER , OR OTHER PERSON BEARS THE BURDENMEANING OFSET DEMONSTRATINGFORTH THATIN THESECTION ACTION11-101-401 QUALIFIES(50). FOR THE EXEMPTION .
-29-(9) 205IF 6-1-1606.A DEVELOPER,A DEPLOYER OR OTHER PERSON ENGAGES IN ANACTIONPURSUANTTOANEXEMPTIONSETFORTHINTHISSECTION THE DEVELOPER ,DEPLOYER , OR OTHER PERSON BEARS THE BURDEN OF DEMONSTRATING THAT THE ACTION QUALIFIES FOR THE EXEMPTION .
6-1-1606.
(1) NOTWITHSTANDINGN OTWITHSTANDING SECTION 6-1-103,THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS EXCLUSIVE AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE THIS PART16.PART 16.
(2) EXCEPTE XCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION(3OFSUBSECTION(3)OF THIS SECTION,A VIOLATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED IN THIS PART 16 CONSTITUTESANUNFAIRTRADEPRACTICEPURSUANTTOSECTION 6-1-105 (1)(eeee).
(3) NIN ANY ACTION COMMENCED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO ENFORCE THIS PART 16, IT IS AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE THAT THE -29- 205 DEVELOPER ,DEPLOYER ,OROR OTHER PERSON:PERSON :
(a) DISCOVERS A VIOLATION OF THIS PA16PA16AS AS A RESULT O:
(I) FFEEDBACK EEDBACK THAT THE DEVELOPER ,,DEPLOYER DEPLOYER,,OR OR OTHER PERSON ENCOURAGES DEPLOYERS OR USERS TO PROVIDE TO THE DEVELOPER ,DEPLOYER ,OROR OTHER PERSON;PERSON ;
(II) ADVERSARIAL TESTING OR RED TEAMING,AS THOSE TERMS ARE DEFINED OR USED BY THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY ;OR (III) A INTERNAL REVIEW PROCESS;AND (b) SI OTHERWISE IN COMPLIANCE WITH:WIT:
(I) TE LATEST VERSION OFTHE"AOFTHE"ARTIFICIALNTELLIGENCE RTIFICIAINTELLIGENCE RISK M ANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK "PUBLISHEDBYTHENATIONALINSTITUTEOF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY IN THE UNITEDU STATESNITEDS TATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND STANDARD ISO/IEC 42001 OF THE INTERNATIONALNTERNATIONAL O RGANIZATION FORSFORSTANDARDIZATION TANDARDIZATION ;
OR -30- 205 (III) ANY RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCESYSTEMSTHATTHEATTORNEYGENERAL ,INTHEATTORNEY GENERAL S DISCRETION,MAY DESIGNATE AND , IF DESIGNATED,SHALL PUBLICLY DISSEMINATE.
(5) N OTHING IN THIS PART16,INCLUDING THE ENFORCEMENT -30- 205 AUTHORITY GRANTED TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL UNDER THIS SECTION, PREEMPTS OR OTHERWISE AFFECTS ANY RIGHT , CLAIM , REMEDY , PRESUMPTION , OR DEFENSE AVAILABLE AT LAW OR IN EQUITY .
Rules.(1)Rules.(1)HEATTORNEYGENERALMAYPROMULGATE TATTORNEYGENERALMAYPROMULGATE RULES AS NECESSARY FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPLEMENTING AND ENFORCING THIS PART16,INCLUDING:
(b) THE CONTENTS OF AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NOTICES AND DISCLOSURESREQUIREDBYSECTIONS 6-1-1602(5)AND (7);6-1-1603(4), -31-(5),(7)AND 205 (5), (7AND (9)AND 6-1-1604;
(e) TEREQUIREMENTSFORTHEREBUTTABLEPRESUMPTIONSSET FORTH IN SECTIONS6-1-1602AND 6-1-1603AND (f) HEREQUIREMENTSFORTHEAFFIRMATIVEDEFENSESETFORTHTEREQUIREMENTSFORTHEAFFIRMATIVEDEFENSESETFORTH IN SECTION 6-1-1606 (3),INCLUDING THE PROCESS BY WHICH THE -31- 205 ATTORNEY GENERAL WILL RECOGNIZE ANY OTHER NATIONALLY OR INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM.
Show all 99 changed rows (59 more)
View plain text versions (9)
- Engrossed Reengrossed (05/03/2024) pdf
- Engrossed Engrossed (05/02/2024) Current pdf
- Signed Act (05/17/2024) View text pdf
- Final Act (05/13/2024) View text pdf
- Rerevised (05/08/2024) View text pdf
- Revised (05/07/2024) View text pdf
- PA2 (05/05/2024) View text pdf
- PA1 (04/25/2024) View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced (04/10/2024) pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
House Third Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor
-
Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Third Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs
-
Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 05/02/2024 - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 05/01/2024 - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 04/30/2024 - No Amendments
-
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
Sponsors
- Robert Rodriguez · Primary
- Brianna Titone · Primary
- Manny Rutinel · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 99 not signed on · 56 voted No
Sponsors (3)
- Robert Rodriguez Democrat
- Brianna Titone Democrat Voted No
- Manny Rutinel Democrat Voted No
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (99)
99 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 99 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 33 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 14% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Armagost | — | Nay |
| Bird | — | Yea |
| Bockenfeld | — | Not Voting |
| Epps | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Herod | — | Yea |
| Holtorf | — | Yea |
| Lynch | — | Nay |
| Marvin | — | Yea |
| McLachlan | — | Yea |
| Ortiz | — | Yea |
| Parenti | — | Yea |
| Pugliese | — | Yea |
| Vigil | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| deGruy Kennedy | — | Yea |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Eliza Hamrick | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jenny Willford | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Yea |
| Manny Rutinel | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matthew Martinez | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Meghan Lukens | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Nay |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Yea |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony Hartsook | Republican | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Nay |
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Yea |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| Fields | — | Yea |
| Gardner | — | Nay |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Nay |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Yea |
| Will | — | Yea |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Van Winkle | — | Nay |
| Winter F. | — | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dafna Michaelson Jenet | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Nay |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Byron Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Rod Pelton | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 30 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 41 | 22 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 34% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Armagost | — | Nay |
| Bird | — | Nay |
| Bockenfeld | — | Not Voting |
| Epps | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Herod | — | Yea |
| Holtorf | — | Nay |
| Lynch | — | Nay |
| Marvin | — | Yea |
| McLachlan | — | Yea |
| Ortiz | — | Yea |
| Parenti | — | Yea |
| Pugliese | — | Yea |
| Vigil | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| deGruy Kennedy | — | Yea |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Nay |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Eliza Hamrick | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jenny Willford | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Yea |
| Manny Rutinel | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matthew Martinez | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Meghan Lukens | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Nay |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Yea |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Nay |
| Anthony Hartsook | Republican | Nay |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Nay |
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Nay |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Nay |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| Fields | — | Yea |
| Gardner | — | Yea |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Yea |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Yea |
| Will | — | Yea |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Van Winkle | — | Yea |
| Winter F. | — | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dafna Michaelson Jenet | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Byron Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Rod Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 34 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 51 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 20% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Armagost | — | Nay |
| Bird | — | Yea |
| Bockenfeld | — | Not Voting |
| Epps | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Herod | — | Yea |
| Holtorf | — | Yea |
| Lynch | — | Nay |
| Marvin | — | Yea |
| McLachlan | — | Yea |
| Ortiz | — | Yea |
| Parenti | — | Yea |
| Pugliese | — | Yea |
| Vigil | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| deGruy Kennedy | — | Yea |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Eliza Hamrick | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jenny Willford | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Yea |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Yea |
| Manny Rutinel | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matthew Martinez | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Meghan Lukens | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Nay |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Yea |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony Hartsook | Republican | Nay |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Nay |
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Nay |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Nay |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 3 | 32 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 43 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 32% | 66% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Armagost | — | Yea |
| Bird | — | Nay |
| Bockenfeld | — | Not Voting |
| Epps | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Nay |
| Herod | — | Nay |
| Holtorf | — | Yea |
| Lynch | — | Yea |
| Marvin | — | Nay |
| McLachlan | — | Nay |
| Ortiz | — | Nay |
| Parenti | — | Nay |
| Pugliese | — | Yea |
| Vigil | — | Nay |
| Young | — | Nay |
| deGruy Kennedy | — | Nay |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Nay |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Nay |
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Nay |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Nay |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Nay |
| Eliza Hamrick | Democrat | Nay |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Nay |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Nay |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Nay |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Nay |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Nay |
| Jenny Willford | Democrat | Nay |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Nay |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Nay |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Nay |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Nay |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Nay |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Nay |
| Manny Rutinel | Democrat | Nay |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Nay |
| Matthew Martinez | Democrat | Nay |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Nay |
| Meghan Lukens | Democrat | Nay |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Nay |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Nay |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Nay |
| Regina English | Democrat | Nay |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Nay |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Nay |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Nay |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Nay |
| Anthony Hartsook | Republican | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Yea |
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Yea |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 3% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| Fields | — | Yea |
| Gardner | — | Yea |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Yea |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Yea |
| Will | — | Yea |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| Fenberg | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Van Winkle | — | Yea |
| Winter F. | — | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dafna Michaelson Jenet | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Byron Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Rod Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 31% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| Fields | — | Yea |
| Gardner | — | Nay |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Nay |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Yea |
| Will | — | Yea |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| Fenberg | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Nay |
| Van Winkle | — | Nay |
| Winter F. | — | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dafna Michaelson Jenet | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Nay |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Nay |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Nay |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Byron Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Rod Pelton | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 24-205 do?
- On and after February 1, 2026, the act requires a developer of a high-risk artificial intelligence system (high-risk system) to use reasonable care to protect consumers from any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination in the high-risk system. There is a rebuttable presumption that a developer used reasonable care if the developer complied with specified provisions in the act, including: Making available to a deployer of the high-risk system a statement disclosing specified information about the high-risk system; Making available to a deployer of the high-risk system information and documentation necessary to complete an impact assessment of the high-risk system; Making a publicly available statement summarizing the types of high-risk systems that the developer has developed or intentionally and substantially modified and currently makes available to a deployer or other developer and how the developer manages any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination that may arise from the development or intentional and substantial modification of each of these high-risk systems; and Disclosing to the attorney general and known deployers or other developers of the high-risk system any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination, within 90 days after the discovery or receipt of a credible report from the deployer, that the high-risk system has caused or is reasonably likely to have caused. The act also, on and after February 1, 2026, requires a deployer of a high-risk system to use reasonable care to protect consumers from any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination in the high-risk system. There is a rebuttable presumption that a deployer used reasonable care if the deployer complied with specified provisions in the act, including: Implementing a risk management policy and program for the high-risk system; Completing an impact assessment of the high-risk system; Annually reviewing the deployment of each high-risk system deployed by the deployer to ensure that the high-risk system is not causing algorithmic discrimination; Notifying a consumer of specified items if the high-risk system makes, or will be a substantial factor in making, a consequential decision concerning the consumer; Providing a consumer with an opportunity to correct any incorrect personal data that a high-risk system processed in making a consequential decision; Providing a consumer with an opportunity to appeal, via human review if technically feasible, an adverse consequential decision concerning the consumer arising from the deployment of a high-risk system; Making a publicly available statement summarizing the types of high-risk systems that the deployer currently deploys, how the deployer manages any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination that may arise from deployment of each of these high-risk systems, and the nature, source, and extent of the information collected and used by the deployer; and Disclosing to the attorney general the discovery of algorithmic discrimination, within 90 days after the discovery, that the high-risk system has caused. A person doing business in this state, including a deployer or other developer, that deploys or makes available an artificial intelligence system that is intended to interact with consumers must ensure disclosure to each consumer who interacts with the artificial intelligence system that the consumer is interacting with an artificial intelligence system. The act does not restrict a developer's, deployer's, or other person's ability to engage in specified activities, including: Complying with federal, state, or municipal laws, ordinances, or regulations; Cooperating with and conducting specified investigations; Taking immediate steps to protect an interest that is essential for the life or physical safety of a consumer; Conducting and engaging in specified research activities; and Effectuating a product recall or repairing technical errors that impair product functionality. The act provides an affirmative defense for a developer, deployer, or other person if: The developer, deployer, or other person involved in a potential violation is in compliance with a nationally or internationally recognized risk management framework for artificial intelligence systems that the act or the attorney general designates; and The developer, deployer, or other person takes specified measures to discover and correct violations of the act. An insurer, a fraternal benefit society, or a developer of an artificial intelligence system used by an insurer is in full compliance with the act if the entity is subject to specified laws governing insurers' use of external consumer data and information sources, algorithms, and predictive models and rules adopted by the commissioner of insurance. A bank, out-of-state bank, credit union chartered by the state of Colorado, federal credit union, out-of-state credit union, or any affiliate or subsidiary thereof, is in full compliance with the act if the entity is subject to examination by a state or federal prudential regulator under any published guidance or regulations that apply to the use of high-risk systems and the guidance or regulations meet criteria specified in the act. The act grants the attorney general rule-making authority to implement, and exclusive authority to enforce, the requirements of the act. A person who violates the act engages in a deceptive trade practice pursuant to the "Colorado Consumer Protection Act". APPROVED by Governor May 17, 2024 EFFECTIVE May 17, 2024(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors SB 24-205?
- SB 24-205 is sponsored by Robert Rodriguez (Democrat), Brianna Titone (Democrat), and Manny Rutinel (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 24-205?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 10, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 24-205?
- Track SB 24-205 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 24-205
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 24-205
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →