Water Conservation Measures
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 24-197 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 24-197.
You're tracking SB 24-197
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 24-197 — Water Conservation Measures
Last action — Governor Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 03, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on May 29, 2024.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (2 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Section 2 of the act allows the owner of a decreed storage water right to loan water to the Colorado water conservation board (board) to preserve or improve the natural environment to a reasonable degree for a stream reach for which the board does not hold a decreed instream flow water right. Current law requires the board to establish an agricultural water protection program for water divisions 1 and 2. Section 3 changes current law by requiring the board to establish an agricultural water protection program in each water division. Current law allows periods of nonuse of a water right to be tolled in certain circumstances for the purposes of determining whether a water right is abandoned. Section 4 changes current law by allowing a water right to be tolled for the duration that an electric utility that owns a water right in water division 6 decreases use of, or does not use, the water right if the decrease in use or nonuse occurs during the period beginning January 1, 2020, and ending December 31, 2050, and if the water right is owned by the electric utility since January 1, 2019 (abandonment exception). Current law requires an owner of a conditional water right to obtain a finding of reasonable diligence or the conditional water right is considered abandoned. Section 5 allows the water judge, in considering a finding of reasonable diligence for a conditional water right that is owned by an electric utility in water division 6 since January 2019, to consider the following as supporting evidence: The conditional water right may be used to support a specific project or potential future generation technologies or concepts that have the potential to advance progress toward Colorado's clean energy and greenhouse gas emission reduction goals; and The electric utility or another entity has made efforts to investigate or research the viability of future generation technologies that have the potential to advance progress toward Colorado's clean energy and greenhouse gas emission reduction goals. In determining the amount of historical consumptive use for a water right, a water judge is prohibited from considering certain specified uses. Section 6 prohibits the water judge from considering the decrease in use or nonuse of a water right owned by an electric utility in water division 6 since January 1, 2019, which decrease in use or nonuse occurs during the period beginning January 1, 2019, and ending December 31, 2050, in determining the amount of historical consumptive use (historical consumptive use protection). If the water right is leased or loaned by the electric utility to a third party, the water right is not entitled to historical consumptive use protection for the period the water right is subject to the lease or loan. To qualify for historical consumption use protection or the abandonment exception, an electric utility that manages all units of a generating station in water division 6 must file with the water division 6 water court an application seeking quantification of historical consumptive use for the absolute direct flow water rights serving the generating station. The application is a claim for a determination of a water right, and the water division 6 water court has jurisdiction to determine the historical consumptive use for the absolute direct flow water rights serving the generating station. Current law allows the board to approve certain grants related to water conservation and requires the board to establish criteria to require the grant applicant to provide matching funds of at least 25%. Section 8 requires the board to reduce or waive fund matching requirements in the case of a grant to the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe or the Southern Ute Indian Tribe. APPROVED by Governor May 29, 2024 EFFECTIVE August 7, 2024(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
73 added · 67 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended bill includes the removal of references to amendments adopted on second reading, updating the context to reflect the changes that have occurred since that time. It also clarifies that a specified stream reach for which the board does not hold a decreed instream flow water right is part of the context for establishing agricultural water rights. These changes are significant because they streamline the process of referencing the current version of the law while focusing on the agricultural water protection definitions and procedures related to the state engineer's rules and the Colorado water conservation board’s guidelines.
Second Regular Session Seventy-fourth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO ENGROSSEDREENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
24-0539.02 Sarah Lozano x3858 SENATE BILL 24-197 SENATE SPONSORSHIP Roberts and Will, HOUSEBridges, SPONSORSHIPExum, McCluskie,Fenberg, SenateFields, CommitteesGardner, HouseGonzales, CommitteesHansen, AgricultureJaquez &Lewis,Kirkmeyer,Lundeen,Marchman,MichaelsonJenet,PeltonB.,PeltonR.,Priola,Rich, NaturalRodriguez, ResourcesSimpson, ASullivan, BILLVan FORWinkle, ANWinter ACTF. C ONCERNING MEASURES FOR THE CONSERVATION OF WATER IN THE STATE ,AND ,IN CONNECTION THEREWITH ,IMPLEMENTING THE PROPOSALS OF THE C OLORADO RIVER DROUGHT TASK FORCE .
HOUSE SPONSORSHIP McCluskie, Senate Committees House Committees Agriculture & Natural Resources A BILL FOR AN ACT C ONCERNING MEASURES FOR THE CONSERVATION OF WATER IN THE STATE ,AND ,IN CONNECTION THEREWITH ,IMPLEMENTING THE PROPOSALS OF THE C OLORADO RIVER DROUGHT TASK FORCE .
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does n d 4 notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill E e 0 passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that T d , N 3 1 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at S e r http://leg.colorado.gov.) n A e A Section 2 of the bill allows the owner of a decreed storage water right to loan water to the Colorado water conservation board (board) for astreamreachforwhichtheboarddoesnotholdadecreedinstreamflow gi water right.
da e4 2 Current law requires the board to establish an agricultural water R 0 T Rd 2, AN n2 51 Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
ES de ir Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n Ap Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
Dashese throughA protectionprogramforwaterdivisions1and2.Section3changescurrent law by requiring the wordsboard orto numbersestablish indicatean deletionsagricultural fromwater existingprotection law.program in each water division.
e A A protectionprogramforwaterdivisions1and2.Section3changescurrent law by requiring the board to establish an agricultural water protection program in each water division.
(II) TEAPPLICATIONDESCRIBEDINSUBSECTION (3)(f)(OFTHIS SECTION IS A CLAIM FOR A DETERMINATION OF A WATER RI,AND THE DIVISION 6 WATER COURT HAS JURISDICTION TO DETERMINE THE HISTORICAL CONSUMPTIVE USE FOR THE ABSOLUTE DIRECT FLOW WATER RIGHTS SERVING THE GENERATING STATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS -8- 197 SECTIONUSINGTHESTANDARDSANDPROCEDURESSETFORTHINSECTIONS 37-92-302,37-92-303,AND 37-92-304AND37-92-304 AND THIS SECTION,SECTION,INCLUDING INCLUDING STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO NOTICE AND PARTICIPATION OFOPPOSERS ;EXCEPT THAT ACHANGE OFWATERRIGHT ISNOT REQUIRED AS A PREREQUISITE FOR THE QUANTIFICATION OF THE HISTORICAL CONSUMPTIVE USE BY THE DIVISION6DIVISION6WATER WATER COURT .
(III) TE QUANTIFICATIONOFTHEHISTORICALCONSUMPTIVEUSE BY THE DIVISION6WATER COURT DESCRIBED IN THIS SUBSECTION(3)(f) MAY BE USED IN A PROCEEDING TO CHANGE THE WATER RIGHT IF AND ONLY IF THE WATER RIGHT SUBJECT TO THE CHANGE WILL NOT BE DIVERTED TO ANY LOCATION EAST OFTHE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE OR SOLD FOR USE OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTALSTATE DIVID.CFOLORADO .
A water right decreed in water division 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 is not eligible for a change in waterrighttoanagriculturalwaterprotection water righttoanagriculturalwaterprotectionwaterright.edright.inthis in this section,an"agriculturalwaterprotectionwaterright"meansawaterright decreedtoallowthelease,loan,ortradeofuptofiftypercentofthewater -9- 197 subject to the water right.
-9- 197 (c) As used in this subsection (19), an "eligible entity" means an entity in water division 1 or 2 SECTION 7.
(a) After a person has obtained a decreed agricultural water protection water right pursuant to section 37-92-30537-92-305(19),whichwater (19),whichwaterrightisavailableonlyinright wateris divisionavailable 1onlyin orwaterdivision1or 2,thepersonmayapplyforasubstitutewatersupplyplanpursuanttothis subsection (12).
This act -10- 197 takes effect at 12:01 a.m.
on the day following the expiration of the -10- 197 ninety-dayperiodafterfinaladjournmentofthegeneralassembly;except that, if a referendumpetition is filed pursuanttosectionpursuant 1to (3)section of1 (3)of article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved bytheby the people at the general election to be held in November 2024 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
View plain text versions (8)
- Engrossed Reengrossed (04/17/2024) pdf
- Engrossed Engrossed (04/15/2024) Current pdf
- Signed Act (05/29/2024) View text pdf
- Final Act (05/08/2024) View text pdf
- Rerevised (05/03/2024) View text pdf
- Revised (05/02/2024) View text pdf
- PA1 (04/11/2024) View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced (04/03/2024) pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Sent to the Governor
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Agriculture, Water & Natural Resources Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Third Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Agriculture, Water & Natural Resources
-
Senate Third Reading Laid Over to 04/17/2024 - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
Senate Committee on Agriculture & Natural Resources Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Agriculture & Natural Resources
Sponsors
- Dylan Roberts · Primary
- Perry Will · Primary
- Julie McCluskie · Primary
- Marc Catlin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 98 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Dylan Roberts Democrat
- Perry Will
- Julie McCluskie Democrat
- Marc Catlin Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (98)
98 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 98 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 63 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Armagost | — | Yea |
| Bird | — | Yea |
| Bockenfeld | — | Not Voting |
| Epps | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Herod | — | Yea |
| Holtorf | — | Yea |
| Lynch | — | Yea |
| Marvin | — | Yea |
| McLachlan | — | Yea |
| Ortiz | — | Not Voting |
| Parenti | — | Yea |
| Pugliese | — | Yea |
| Vigil | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| deGruy Kennedy | — | Yea |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Eliza Hamrick | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jenny Willford | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Yea |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Yea |
| Manny Rutinel | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matthew Martinez | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Meghan Lukens | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Yea |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony Hartsook | Republican | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Yea |
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Yea |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buckner | — | Not Voting |
| Fields | — | Yea |
| Gardner | — | Yea |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Yea |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Yea |
| Will | — | Yea |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| Fenberg | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Van Winkle | — | Yea |
| Winter F. | — | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dafna Michaelson Jenet | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Byron Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Rod Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buckner | — | Not Voting |
| Fields | — | Yea |
| Gardner | — | Yea |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Yea |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Yea |
| Will | — | Yea |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| Fenberg | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Van Winkle | — | Yea |
| Winter F. | — | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dafna Michaelson Jenet | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Byron Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Rod Pelton | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 24-197 do?
- Section 2 of the act allows the owner of a decreed storage water right to loan water to the Colorado water conservation board (board) to preserve or improve the natural environment to a reasonable degree for a stream reach for which the board does not hold a decreed instream flow water right. Current law requires the board to establish an agricultural water protection program for water divisions 1 and 2. Section 3 changes current law by requiring the board to establish an agricultural water protection program in each water division. Current law allows periods of nonuse of a water right to be tolled in certain circumstances for the purposes of determining whether a water right is abandoned. Section 4 changes current law by allowing a water right to be tolled for the duration that an electric utility that owns a water right in water division 6 decreases use of, or does not use, the water right if the decrease in use or nonuse occurs during the period beginning January 1, 2020, and ending December 31, 2050, and if the water right is owned by the electric utility since January 1, 2019 (abandonment exception). Current law requires an owner of a conditional water right to obtain a finding of reasonable diligence or the conditional water right is considered abandoned. Section 5 allows the water judge, in considering a finding of reasonable diligence for a conditional water right that is owned by an electric utility in water division 6 since January 2019, to consider the following as supporting evidence: The conditional water right may be used to support a specific project or potential future generation technologies or concepts that have the potential to advance progress toward Colorado's clean energy and greenhouse gas emission reduction goals; and The electric utility or another entity has made efforts to investigate or research the viability of future generation technologies that have the potential to advance progress toward Colorado's clean energy and greenhouse gas emission reduction goals. In determining the amount of historical consumptive use for a water right, a water judge is prohibited from considering certain specified uses. Section 6 prohibits the water judge from considering the decrease in use or nonuse of a water right owned by an electric utility in water division 6 since January 1, 2019, which decrease in use or nonuse occurs during the period beginning January 1, 2019, and ending December 31, 2050, in determining the amount of historical consumptive use (historical consumptive use protection). If the water right is leased or loaned by the electric utility to a third party, the water right is not entitled to historical consumptive use protection for the period the water right is subject to the lease or loan. To qualify for historical consumption use protection or the abandonment exception, an electric utility that manages all units of a generating station in water division 6 must file with the water division 6 water court an application seeking quantification of historical consumptive use for the absolute direct flow water rights serving the generating station. The application is a claim for a determination of a water right, and the water division 6 water court has jurisdiction to determine the historical consumptive use for the absolute direct flow water rights serving the generating station. Current law allows the board to approve certain grants related to water conservation and requires the board to establish criteria to require the grant applicant to provide matching funds of at least 25%. Section 8 requires the board to reduce or waive fund matching requirements in the case of a grant to the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe or the Southern Ute Indian Tribe. APPROVED by Governor May 29, 2024 EFFECTIVE August 7, 2024(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors SB 24-197?
- SB 24-197 is sponsored by Dylan Roberts (Democrat), Perry Will, Julie McCluskie (Democrat), and Marc Catlin (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 24-197?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 03, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 24-197?
- Track SB 24-197 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 24-197
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 24-197
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →