Water Desalination Study And Report
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 23-262 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 23-262.
You're tracking SB 23-262
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 23-262 — Water Desalination Study And Report
Last action — House Committee on Appropriations Lay Over Unamended - Amendment(s) Failed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The bill requires the Colorado water conservation board (CWCB) to perform a comprehensive literature review of existing research on the challenges and opportunities of desalination facilities in California or Mexico. The literature review must include a summary of the current status of research on desalination, including quantification of certain costs of and benefits that could be realized from the construction and perpetual operation of one or more water desalination facilities in California or Mexico, or both. On or before July 1, 2025, the CWCB must complete the study and submit a report of the CWCB's findings and recommendations to: The Colorado legislative committees of reference that consider water matters; The governor; and The bureau of reclamation in the federal department of the interior. For the 2023-24 state fiscal year, the bill appropriates $50,000 from the Colorado water conservation board construction fund to the department of natural resources for use by the CWCB to pay operating expenses. (Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.) (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
24 added · 19 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment specifies that the bill requires the Colorado water conservation board (CWCB) to conduct a comprehensive literature review of existing research on water scarcity in the Colorado River Basin. This change clarifies the board's role in addressing water scarcity issues and emphasizes the importance of utilizing existing research to inform future actions.
First Regular Session Seventy-fourth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO ENGROSSEDREENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
23-0199.01 Richard Sweetman x4333 SENATE BILL 23-262 SENATE SPONSORSHIP Priola and Mullica, Jaquez Lewis HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Ricks and Soper, Senate Committees House Committees Agriculture & Natural Resources Appropriations A BILL FOR AN ACT CONCERNINGC ONCERNING REQUIRING THE CCOLORADO OLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARDTOSTUDYTHEFEASIBILITYOFWATERDESALINATIONAS A POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTING SOLUTION TO THE CRISIS OF WATER SCARCITY IN THE CCOLORADO OLORADO RIVER BASIN , AND , IN CONNECTION THEREWITH ,MAKING AN APPROPRIATION .
d d Bill Summary e 3 E a 0 A U , (Note:
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does N i l notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill S a p R A passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that r applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at 3 http://leg.colorado.gov.) g ThebillrequirestheColoradowaterconservation board(CWCB) di a 3 to perform a comprehensive literature review of existing research on the eE 2R 0 T Rd 2, AN n2 12 Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
ES de ir Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n Ap Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
Dashese throughA thechallenges wordsand oropportunities numbersof indicatedesalination deletionsfacilities fromin existingCalifornia law.or Mexico.
e A A challenges and opportunities of desalination facilities in California or Mexico.
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed Reengrossed (04/24/2023) pdf
- Engrossed Engrossed (04/21/2023) Current pdf
- PA1 (04/21/2023) View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced (04/03/2023) pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
House Committee on Appropriations Lay Over Unamended - Amendment(s) Failed
-
House Committee on Energy & Environment Refer Unamended to Appropriations
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Energy & Environment
-
Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
Senate Committee on Agriculture & Natural Resources Refer Unamended to Appropriations
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Agriculture & Natural Resources
Sponsors
- Matt Soper · Primary
- Naquetta Ricks · Primary
- Kyle Mullica · Primary
- Kevin Priola · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 98 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- Matt Soper Republican
- Naquetta Ricks Democrat
- Kyle Mullica Democrat
- Kevin Priola
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (98)
98 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 98 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 34% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| Fields | — | Yea |
| Gardner | — | Nay |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Nay |
| Moreno | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Nay |
| Pelton R. | — | Nay |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Nay |
| Will | — | Nay |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Van Winkle | — | Nay |
| Winter F. | — | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Nay |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Not Voting |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 23-262 do?
- The bill requires the Colorado water conservation board (CWCB) to perform a comprehensive literature review of existing research on the challenges and opportunities of desalination facilities in California or Mexico. The literature review must include a summary of the current status of research on desalination, including quantification of certain costs of and benefits that could be realized from the construction and perpetual operation of one or more water desalination facilities in California or Mexico, or both. On or before July 1, 2025, the CWCB must complete the study and submit a report of the CWCB's findings and recommendations to: The Colorado legislative committees of reference that consider water matters; The governor; and The bureau of reclamation in the federal department of the interior. For the 2023-24 state fiscal year, the bill appropriates $50,000 from the Colorado water conservation board construction fund to the department of natural resources for use by the CWCB to pay operating expenses. (Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.) (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
- Who sponsors SB 23-262?
- SB 23-262 is sponsored by Matt Soper (Republican), Naquetta Ricks (Democrat), Kyle Mullica (Democrat), and Kevin Priola.
- What is the current status of SB 23-262?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 23-262?
- Track SB 23-262 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 23-262
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 23-262
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →