Public Benefits Theft
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 22-1224 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 22-1224.
You're tracking HB 22-1224
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 22-1224 — Public Benefits Theft
Last action — Governor Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
3 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (1 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The act creates specific elements for public benefits theft in the theft statute. A person commits public benefits theft when a person intentionally misrepresents or withholds a material fact for determining eligibility, and does so for the purpose of obtaining or retaining public benefits for which the person is not eligible. A person's conduct that is limited to the elements of public benefits theft is not subject to prosecution pursuant to any other provision of the theft statute. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
22 added · 18 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of HB 22-1224 includes new elements that clarify the definition of theft of public benefits. Specifically, it outlines specific actions that constitute this type of theft, making it easier to identify and prosecute offenders. These changes are important as they aim to strengthen protections for public resources and ensure that those who exploit these benefits are held accountable. This clarity helps lawmakers, law enforcement, and the public understand what behaviors are considered illegal under this bill.
Second Regular Session Seventy-third General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO ENGROSSEDREENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
22-0358.01 Shelby Ross x4510 HOUSE BILL 22-1224 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Tipper and Soper, Bird, Bockenfeld, Boesenecker, Esgar, Froelich, Gonzales-Gutierrez, Hooton, Jodeh, Kennedy, Kipp, Lindsay SENATE SPONSORSHIP Gonzales, House Committees Senate Committees Judiciary A BILL FOR AN ACT C ONCERNING THEFT OF PUBLIC BENEFITS .
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that e applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at n 2 m 0 http://leg.colorado.gov.) E n , U U 1 The bill creates specific elements for public benefits theft in the O i h H a a theft statute.
A person commits public benefits theft when a person R M intentionally misrepresents or withholds a material fact for determining r eligibility, and does so for the purpose of obtaining or retaining public benefits the recipient of the public benefits is not eligible for.
For the purposes of calculating the value of the public benefit i 2 involved, the bill defines it as the difference between the value of the a 20 public benefit received and the value of the public benefit the recipient SE Re 5, OU nd 1 O 2 h Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
H 2d ra Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing statdte.statude.M Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.
Dashese throughA waseligiblefor;exceptthat,iftheagencythatprovidesthepublicbenefit makes a referral for prosecution more than 180 calendar days after first receivingevidenceofamisrepresentationorwithholdingofmaterialfact, the wordsvalue indicateof deletionsthe public benefit received after the agency received the evidence must be subtracted from existingthe statute.total.
e m A waseligiblefor;exceptthat,iftheagencythatprovidesthepublicbenefit makes a referral for prosecution more than 180 calendar days after first receivingevidenceofamisrepresentationorwithholdingofmaterialfact, the value of the public benefit received after the agency received the evidence must be subtracted from the total.
View plain text versions (8)
- Engrossed Reengrossed (03/16/2022) pdf
- Engrossed Engrossed (03/15/2022) Current pdf
- Signed Act (04/21/2022) View text pdf
- Final Act (04/18/2022) View text pdf
- Rerevised (04/05/2022) View text pdf
- Revised (04/04/2022) View text pdf
- PA1 (03/11/2022) View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced (02/10/2022) pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
Sponsors
- Julie Gonzales · Primary
- Matt Soper · Primary
- Kerry Tipper · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 99 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (3)
- Julie Gonzales Democrat
- Matt Soper Republican
- Kerry Tipper
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (99)
99 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 99 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 9% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| Cooke | — | Yea |
| Coram | — | Yea |
| Donovan | — | Yea |
| Fields | — | Yea |
| Gardner | — | Yea |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Hisey | — | Yea |
| Holbert | — | Nay |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Not Voting |
| Moreno | — | Yea |
| Pettersen | — | Yea |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Rankin | — | Yea |
| Scott | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Nay |
| Sonnenberg | — | Yea |
| Woodward | — | Yea |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| Fenberg | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 27 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 57 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 9% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bernett | — | Yea |
| Bird | — | Yea |
| Bockenfeld | — | Yea |
| Caraveo | — | Yea |
| Carver | — | Yea |
| Esgar | — | Yea |
| Geitner | — | Yea |
| Gonzales-Gutierrez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Hanks | — | Nay |
| Herod | — | Yea |
| Holtorf | — | Yea |
| Hooton | — | Yea |
| Larson | — | Yea |
| Lontine | — | Yea |
| Lynch | — | Yea |
| McKean | — | Yea |
| McLachlan | — | Yea |
| Neville | — | Nay |
| Ortiz | — | Yea |
| Pico | — | Yea |
| Ransom | — | Nay |
| Sandridge | — | Not Voting |
| Tipper | — | Yea |
| Will | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Garnett | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Michaelson Jenet | — | Not Voting |
| Valdez D. | — | Yea |
| Van Beber | — | Yea |
| Van Winkle | — | Nay |
| Williams D. | — | Nay |
| deGruy Kennedy | — | Yea |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Woog | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Rod Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 22-1224 do?
- The act creates specific elements for public benefits theft in the theft statute. A person commits public benefits theft when a person intentionally misrepresents or withholds a material fact for determining eligibility, and does so for the purpose of obtaining or retaining public benefits for which the person is not eligible. A person's conduct that is limited to the elements of public benefits theft is not subject to prosecution pursuant to any other provision of the theft statute. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors HB 22-1224?
- HB 22-1224 is sponsored by Julie Gonzales (Democrat), Matt Soper (Republican), and Kerry Tipper.
- What is the current status of HB 22-1224?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 22-1224?
- Track HB 22-1224 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 22-1224
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 22-1224
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →