Simplify Local Sales & Use Tax Administration
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 22-032 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 22-032.
You're tracking SB 22-032
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 22-032 — Simplify Local Sales & Use Tax Administration
Last action — Governor Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 12, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
In order to enable the streamlining of the imposition, collection, and administration of sales and use taxes imposed by local taxing jurisdictions on retail sales made by retailers that have a state standard retail license and either do not have physical presence within a local taxing jurisdiction or have only incidental physical presence within a local taxing jurisdiction through the streamlining of application requirements for and elimination of fees for local general business licenses, the act requires the department of revenue (department) to require sufficient information to be collected from such a retailer, when the retailer applies for or renews a state standard retail business license through the state's electronic sales and use tax simplification system (SUTS) or by other means or at any other time to the extent necessary, and made available to local taxing jurisdictions to ensure that concerns of local taxing jurisdictions, including but not limited to concerns relating to administrative efficiency, retailer compliance, and collection of sales and use tax revenue, are addressed. The department is required to consult with local taxing jurisdictions when determining what information to collect and how to make the information collected available to local taxing jurisdictions. The department is also required to consult with retailers and to address any reasonable concerns that they may have. The department is required to accomplish these tasks expeditiously so that no later than July 1, 2023, and sooner if feasible, a retailer that has a state standard retail license and either does not have physical presence within a local taxing jurisdiction or has only incidental physical presence can make retail sales within the local taxing jurisdiction without having to obtain a general business license from the local taxing jurisdiction. On and after July 1, 2022, a local taxing jurisdiction is prohibited from charging a fee for a local general business license to a retailer that has a state standard retail license, makes retail sales within the local taxing jurisdiction, and either does not have physical presence within the local taxing jurisdiction or has only incidental physical presence within the local taxing jurisdiction. On and after July 1, 2023, a local taxing jurisdiction is prohibited from requiring such a retailer to apply separately to the local taxing jurisdiction for a general business license. A local taxing jurisdiction must automatically issue a general business license to such a retailer unless the local taxing jurisdiction has previously revoked a general business license held by the retailer for a violation of its local code. For the 2022-23 state fiscal year, $2,100 is appropriated to the department for use by the taxation services division to implement the act. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
25 added · 18 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of the bill reflects a change in the title from "ENGROSSED" to "REENGROSSED," indicating it includes all amendments adopted in the House of Introduction. Additionally, there are minor formatting and text adjustments that clarify language related to the Sales and Use Tax Simplification Task Force. These changes are important because they ensure that the bill accurately reflects its current status and any modifications made during the legislative process.
Second Regular Session Seventy-third General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO ENGROSSEDREENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
22-0152.01 Jason Gelender x4330 SENATE BILL 22-032 SENATE SPONSORSHIP Bridges and Woodward, Cooke, Donovan, Fenberg, Fields, Ginal, Hisey, Holbert, Kolker, Lee, Liston, Lundeen, Moreno, Pettersen, Priola, Rankin, Scott, Simpson, Smallwood, Winter, Zenzinger HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Kipp and Van Winkle, Senate Committees House Committees Business, Labor, & Technology Appropriations A BILL FOR AN ACT C ONCERNING SIMPLIFICATION OF LOCAL SALES AND USE TAX COMPLIANCEANDADMINISTRATIONFORRETAILERSTHATMAKE RETAIL SALES IN LOCAL TAXING JURISDICTIONS WHERE THEY HAVE LIMITED PHYSICAL PRESENCE , AND , IN CONNECTION THEREWITH ,MAKING, MAKING AN APPROPRIATION .
d d Bill Summary e 2 E a 2 A U 7 (Note:
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does N i h notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill S a a R M passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that r applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at 3 http://leg.colorado.gov/.) g SalesandUseTaxSimplificationTaskForce.Inordertoenable di a 2 thestreamliningoftheimposition,collection,andadministrationofsales eE 2R 20 T Rd 2, AN n2 4h Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
ES de cr Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing statune.M Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.
Dashese A and use taxes imposed by local taxing jurisdictions on retail sales made byretailersthat have a state standard retail license and either do not have physical presence in a local taxing jurisdiction or have only incidental physical presence in a local taxing jurisdiction through the wordsstreamlining indicateof deletionsapplication fromrequirements existingfor statute.and elimination of fees for local general businesslicenses,thebillrequiresthedepartmentofrevenue(department) torequiresufficientinformationtobecollectedfromsucharetailer,when the retailer applies for or renews a state standard retail business license through the state's electronic sales and use tax simplification system (SUTS) or by other means or at any other time to the extent necessary, andmadeavailabletolocaltaxingjurisdictionstoensurethatconcernsof local taxing jurisdictions, including but not limited to concerns relating to administrative efficiency, retailer compliance, and collection of sales and use tax revenue are addressed.
e M A and use taxes imposed by local taxing jurisdictions on retail sales made byretailersthat have a state standard retail license and either do not have physical presence in a local taxing jurisdiction or have only incidental physical presence in a local taxing jurisdiction through the streamlining of application requirements for and elimination of fees for local general businesslicenses,thebillrequiresthedepartmentofrevenue(department) torequiresufficientinformationtobecollectedfromsucharetailer,when the retailer applies for or renews a state standard retail business license through the state's electronic sales and use tax simplification system (SUTS) or by other means or at any other time to the extent necessary, andmadeavailabletolocaltaxingjurisdictionstoensurethatconcernsof local taxing jurisdictions, including but not limited to concerns relating to administrative efficiency, retailer compliance, and collection of sales and use tax revenue are addressed.
View plain text versions (9)
- Engrossed Reengrossed (03/07/2022) pdf
- Engrossed Engrossed (03/04/2022) Current pdf
- Signed Act (04/21/2022) View text pdf
- Final Act (04/14/2022) View text pdf
- Rerevised (04/04/2022) View text pdf
- Revised (04/01/2022) View text pdf
- PA2 (03/04/2022) View text pdf
- PA1 (01/27/2022) View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced (01/12/2022) pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Sent to the Governor
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Business Affairs & Labor Refer Unamended to Appropriations
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs & Labor
-
Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Refer Amended to Appropriations
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology
Sponsors
- Cathy Kipp · Primary
- Rob Woodward · Primary
- Jeff Bridges · Primary
- Van Winkle · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 97 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Cathy Kipp Democrat
- Rob Woodward
- Jeff Bridges Democrat
- Van Winkle
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (97)
97 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 97 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bernett | — | Yea |
| Bird | — | Yea |
| Bockenfeld | — | Yea |
| Caraveo | — | Yea |
| Carver | — | Yea |
| Esgar | — | Yea |
| Geitner | — | Yea |
| Gonzales-Gutierrez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Hanks | — | Yea |
| Herod | — | Yea |
| Holtorf | — | Yea |
| Hooton | — | Yea |
| Larson | — | Yea |
| Lontine | — | Yea |
| Lynch | — | Yea |
| McKean | — | Yea |
| McLachlan | — | Yea |
| Neville | — | Yea |
| Ortiz | — | Yea |
| Pico | — | Yea |
| Ransom | — | Yea |
| Sandridge | — | Yea |
| Tipper | — | Yea |
| Will | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Garnett | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Michaelson Jenet | — | Yea |
| Valdez D. | — | Yea |
| Van Beber | — | Yea |
| Van Winkle | — | Yea |
| Williams D. | — | Yea |
| deGruy Kennedy | — | Yea |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Woog | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Rod Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 31 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| Cooke | — | Yea |
| Coram | — | Not Voting |
| Donovan | — | Yea |
| Fields | — | Yea |
| Gardner | — | Not Voting |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Hisey | — | Yea |
| Holbert | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Yea |
| Moreno | — | Yea |
| Pettersen | — | Yea |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Rankin | — | Yea |
| Scott | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Yea |
| Sonnenberg | — | Yea |
| Woodward | — | Yea |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| Fenberg | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Not Voting |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 22-032 do?
- In order to enable the streamlining of the imposition, collection, and administration of sales and use taxes imposed by local taxing jurisdictions on retail sales made by retailers that have a state standard retail license and either do not have physical presence within a local taxing jurisdiction or have only incidental physical presence within a local taxing jurisdiction through the streamlining of application requirements for and elimination of fees for local general business licenses, the act requires the department of revenue (department) to require sufficient information to be collected from such a retailer, when the retailer applies for or renews a state standard retail business license through the state's electronic sales and use tax simplification system (SUTS) or by other means or at any other time to the extent necessary, and made available to local taxing jurisdictions to ensure that concerns of local taxing jurisdictions, including but not limited to concerns relating to administrative efficiency, retailer compliance, and collection of sales and use tax revenue, are addressed. The department is required to consult with local taxing jurisdictions when determining what information to collect and how to make the information collected available to local taxing jurisdictions. The department is also required to consult with retailers and to address any reasonable concerns that they may have. The department is required to accomplish these tasks expeditiously so that no later than July 1, 2023, and sooner if feasible, a retailer that has a state standard retail license and either does not have physical presence within a local taxing jurisdiction or has only incidental physical presence can make retail sales within the local taxing jurisdiction without having to obtain a general business license from the local taxing jurisdiction. On and after July 1, 2022, a local taxing jurisdiction is prohibited from charging a fee for a local general business license to a retailer that has a state standard retail license, makes retail sales within the local taxing jurisdiction, and either does not have physical presence within the local taxing jurisdiction or has only incidental physical presence within the local taxing jurisdiction. On and after July 1, 2023, a local taxing jurisdiction is prohibited from requiring such a retailer to apply separately to the local taxing jurisdiction for a general business license. A local taxing jurisdiction must automatically issue a general business license to such a retailer unless the local taxing jurisdiction has previously revoked a general business license held by the retailer for a violation of its local code. For the 2022-23 state fiscal year, $2,100 is appropriated to the department for use by the taxation services division to implement the act. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors SB 22-032?
- SB 22-032 is sponsored by Cathy Kipp (Democrat), Rob Woodward, Jeff Bridges (Democrat), and Van Winkle.
- What is the current status of SB 22-032?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 12, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 22-032?
- Track SB 22-032 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 22-032
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 22-032
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →