Colorado 2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted

HJR 22-1002 — Study State And Interstate Highway Vehicle Weight

Last action — Signed by the President of the Senate

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 12, 2022. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 76% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

111 added · 107 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to HJR 22-1002 adds the names Pico and Rich, Boesenecker, Catlin, Exum, Froelich, Gray, Hooton, Sullivan, Valdez D., Hisey, and Zenzinger to the list of individuals associated with the measure. It also removes the names Cooke, Fields, Gardner, Holbert, Kirkmeyer, Liston, Lundeen, Pettersen, Priola, Rankin, Simpson, Smallwood, Sonnenberg, Winter, and Woodward from the same list. These changes affect the sponsorship by updating the individuals who support the request for Congress regarding trucking on Colorado's interstate highway system.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 22-1002 BYREPRESENTATIVE(S) Pico andRich, Boesenecker, Catlin, Exum, Froelich, Gray, Hooton, Sullivan, Valdez D., Van Winkle, Amabile, Bacon, Baisley, Benavidez, Bernett, Bird, Bockenfeld, Bradfield, Caraveo, Carver, Cutter, Daugherty, Duran, Esgar, Geitner, Gonzales-Gutierrez, Hanks, Herod, Jodeh, Kennedy, Kipp, Larson, Lindsay, Lontine, Luck, Lynch, McCluskie, McCormick, McKean, McLachlan,Mullica,Neville, Ortiz,Pelton,Ransom,Roberts, Sandridge, Sirota, Snyder, Soper, Tipper, Titone, ValdezA., VanBeber, Weissman, Will, Williams, Woodrow, Woog, Young, Garnett;
Second Regular Session Seventy-third General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO ENGROSSED LLS NO.
also SENATOR(S)HiseyandZenzinger, Coram,Donovan, Scott, Cooke, Fields, Gardner, Holbert, Kirkmeyer, Liston, Lundeen, Pettersen, Priola, Rankin, Simpson, Smallwood, Sonnenberg, Winter, Woodward.
R22-0080.02 Jery Payne x2157 HJR22-1002 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Pico and Rich,Boesenecker, Catlin, Exum, Froelich, Gray, Hooton, Sullivan, Valdez D., Van Winkle, Amabile, Bacon, Baisley, Benavidez, Bernett, Bird, Bockenfeld, Bradfield, Caraveo, Carver, Cutter, Daugherty, Duran, Esgar, Garnett, Geitner, Gonzales-Gutierrez, Hanks, Herod, Jodeh, Kennedy, Kipp, Larson, Lindsay, Lontine, Luck, Lynch, McCluskie, McCormick, McKean, McLachlan, Mullica, Neville, Ortiz, Pelton, Ransom, Roberts, Sandridge, Sirota, Snyder, Soper, Tipper, Titone, Valdez A., Van Beber, Weissman, Will, Williams, Woodrow, Woog, Young SENATE SPONSORSHIP Hisey and Zenzinger,Coram, Donovan, Scott House Committees Senate Committees Transportation & Local Government HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 22-1002 CONCERNING A REQUEST THAT C ONGRESS ALLOW THE STATE OF C OLORADO TO CONDUCT AN ANALYSIS OF AND POSSIBLY MOVE FORWARD ON HARMONIZING THE GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT FOR TRUCKSONTHE INTERSTATE H IGHWAY S YSTEMIN COLORADO WITH THAT OF OTHER STATE HIGHWAYS .
CONCERNING A REQUEST THAT CONGRESS ALLOW THE STATE OF COLORADO TO CONDUCT AN ANALYSIS OF AND POSSIBLY MOVE FORWARD ON HARMONIZING THE GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT FOR TRUCKS ON THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM IN COLORADO WITH THAT OF OTHER STATE HIGHWAYS.
WHEREAS,Truckingandtruckdrivershavebeenessentialduring the COVID-19 pandemic in delivering critical goods, such as food, fuel, medical supplies, and much more;
WHEREAS,Truckingandtruckdrivershavebeenessentialduringthe COVID-19 pandemic in delivering critical goods, such as food, fuel, medical supplies, and much more;
and WHEREAS, Trucking is critical in the movement of goods and products for agriculture, ranchers, manufacturers, grocers, and fuel suppliers,withover80%ofthemanufacturedproductsinColoradobeing moved by truck;
and WHEREAS, Trucking is critical in the movement of goods and products for agriculture, ranchers, manufacturers, grocers, and fuel suppliers, with over 80% ofthemanufacturedproducts inColoradobeing moved by truck;
and g 0 E d , S e 1 O l r Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
and WHEREAS, 79% ofthe communities in Colorado are served solely by truck for their freight needs;
Double underlining denotes SENATE amendHei r Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to Fxesting statute.
and WHEREAS, The state's and nation's supply chains have been greatly stressed due to a range of issues that include a truck driver shortage, which is anticipated to continue into the future, along with increasing freight demands from ourgrowingstatethathave ledto shortages, delays, and higher prices for the movement of goods within the state;
Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.
and WHEREAS, For over 40 years, Colorado state law has authorized a maximum gross vehicle weight of85,000 pounds for all state highways, with the only exception being the Interstate Highway System;
F WHEREAS, 79% of the communities in Colorado are served solely by truck for their freight needs;
and WHEREAS, Federallawauthorizes amaximumgross vehicleweight of 80,000 pounds for the Interstate Highway System;
and WHEREAS, The state's and nation's supply chains have been greatly stressed due to a range of issues that include a truck driver shortage, which is anticipated to continue into the future, along with increasing freight demands from our growing state that have led to shortages,delays,andhigherpricesforthemovementofgoodswithinthe state;
and WHEREAS, The different gross vehicle weight standards between interstate and state highways causes routing issues for the state's transportation system;
and WHEREAS,Forover40years,Coloradostatelawhasauthorized amaximumgrossvehicleweightof85,000poundsforallstatehighways, with the only exception being the Interstate Highway System;
and WHEREAS, TheInterstateHighwaySystemis constructedto ahigher designspecificationthanmoststatehighways andshouldbemore capable ofhandling higher weights than other state highways;
and WHEREAS, Federal law authorizes a maximum gross vehicle weight of 80,000 pounds for the Interstate Highway System;
and WHEREAS,Thedifferentgrossvehicleweightstandardsbetween interstate and state highways causes routing issues for the state's transportation system;
and WHEREAS, The Interstate Highway System is constructed to a higherdesignspecificationthanmoststatehighwaysandshouldbemore capable of handling higher weights than other state highways;
and WHEREAS, During the COVID-19 pandemic, Governor Polis, with the support ofthe United States Department ofTransportation, approved an emergency waiver that temporarily raised the maximum weight of trucks allowed on Colorado interstate highways from 80,000 to 85,000 pounds in order to move essential goods and supplies, and there was no discernible increase in truck accidents on the Interstate Highway System in Colorado;
and WHEREAS, During the COVID-19 pandemic, Governor Polis, with the support of the United States Department of Transportation, approved an emergency waiver that temporarily raised the maximum weightoftrucksallowedonColoradointerstatehighwaysfrom80,000to 85,000 pounds in order to move essential goods and supplies, and there was no discernible increase in truck accidents on the Interstate Highway System in Colorado;
and WHEREAS, Increasing the gross vehicle weight for the Interstate Highway System to match that of other state highways may result in fewer trucks, less vehicle miles traveled, and lower emissions of greenhouse gases, andthis helpsthe stateto meetits greenhouse emission rules and comply with emission standards of the United States Environmental Protection Agency;
and WHEREAS,IncreasingthegrossvehicleweightfortheInterstate Highway System to match that of other state highways may result in fewer trucks, less vehicle miles traveled, and lower emissions of greenhousegases,andthishelpsthestatetomeetitsgreenhouseemission rules and comply with emission standards of the United States -2- 1002 Environmental Protection Agency;
and PAGE 2-HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 22-1002 WHEREAS, Governor Polis, the Colorado General Assembly, the Colorado Department of Transportation, and the Colorado State Patrol maybe bestpositionedto determine ifitis inthe bestinterests ofthe state to harmonize the maximum gross vehicle weight for the state's Interstate Highway System with other state highways;
and WHEREAS,GovernorPolis,theColoradoGeneralAssembly,the Colorado Department of Transportation, and the Colorado State Patrol maybebestpositionedtodetermineifitisinthebestinterestsofthestate to harmonize the maximum gross vehicle weight for the state's Interstate Highway System with other state highways;
and WHEREAS, A study performed by the Colorado Department of Transportationconsideringsafety, environmental,mobility, andeconomic factors is the best way to assess the benefits and costs of changing the maximum gross vehicle weight for trucks on Colorado interstate highways;
and WHEREAS, A study performed by the Colorado Department of Transportationconsideringsafety,environmental,mobility,andeconomic factors is the best way to assess the benefits and costs of changing the maximum gross vehicle weight for trucks on Colorado interstate highways;
and WHEREAS, If approved by the United States Congress and if the study finds that it is inthe best interests ofthe state to raise the maximum gross vehicle weight on the Interstate Highway Systemto 85,000 pounds to harmonize itwith other state highways, the state ofColorado, withthe approval of the General Assembly and the Governor, would move forward with a change to state statute;
and WHEREAS, If approved bythe United States Congress and if the studyfinds thatitisinthebestinterestsof the state to raise the maximum grossvehicleweight on the Interstate HighwaySystemto85,000pounds to harmonize it with other state highways, the state of Colorado, with the approval of the General Assembly and the Governor, would move forward with a change to state statute;
now, therefore, Be It Resolved by the House ofRepresentatives ofthe Seventy-third GeneralAssembly oftheState ofColorado, theSenate concurringherein:
now, therefore, BeItResolvedbytheHouseofRepresentativesoftheSeventy-third GeneralAssemblyoftheStateofColorado,theSenateconcurringherein:
(1) That Congress allow the Colorado Department ofTransportation to conduct an analysisofincreasingthe gross vehicle weight limit for the Interstate Highway System in Colorado to harmonize it with other state highways where 85,000 pounds is the maximum weight;
(1) That Congress allow the Colorado Department of Transportation to conduct an analysis of increasing the gross vehicle weightlimitfortheInterstateHighwaySysteminColoradotoharmonize it with other state highways where 85,000 pounds is the maximum weight;
and (2) That if the completed study determines that it is in the best interests ofColoradoto harmonizetheweights fortheInterstateHighway Systemandotherstatehighways, the Colorado GeneralAssemblyandthe Governor be permitted by state statute to increase the gross vehicle weight limit to 85,000 pounds for vehicles traveling on the Interstate Highway System in Colorado.
and (2) That if the completed study determines that it is in the best interestsofColoradotoharmonizetheweightsfortheInterstateHighway Systemandotherstatehighways,theColoradoGeneralAssemblyandthe Governor be permitted by state statute to increase the gross vehicle weight limit to 85,000 pounds for vehicles traveling on the Interstate Highway System in Colorado.
PAGE 3-HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 22-1002 Be ItFurther ResolThat copies ofthis JointResolution be sentto the President the United States, the President Pro Tempore of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, and each member of Colorado's congressional delegation.
-3- 1002 BeItFurtherResolved,ThatcopiesofthisJointResolutionbesent to the President of the United States, the President Pro Tempore of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, and each member of Colorado's congressional delegation.
Alec Garnett v enberg SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE ~ ~ ~ Robin Jones Cindi L.
-4- 1002
Markwell CHIEF CLERK O THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE PAGE 4-HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 22-1002
View plain text versions (4)

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Signed by the President of the Senate

  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  3. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  4. Senate Committee on Transportation & Energy Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  5. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Transportation & Energy

  6. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  7. House Committee on Transportation & Local Government Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole

  8. Introduced In House - Assigned to Transportation & Local Government

Sponsors

  • Rachel Zenzinger · Primary
  • Dennis Hisey · Primary
  • Janice Rich · Primary
  • Andres Pico · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 98 not signed on

Sponsors (4)

  • Rachel Zenzinger
  • Dennis Hisey
  • Janice Rich
  • Andres Pico

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (98)

98 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 98 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

RESOLUTION

Passed 32 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 5002
Unaffiliated 23000
Republican 4000
Total 32002
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (34)
Member Party Vote
Buckner — Yea
Cooke — Yea
Coram — Yea
Donovan — Yea
Fields — Yea
Gardner — Yea
Ginal — Yea
Hansen — Yea
Hisey — Yea
Holbert — Yea
Lee — Yea
Lundeen — Yea
Moreno — Yea
Pettersen — Yea
Priola — Yea
Rankin — Yea
Scott — Yea
Smallwood — Yea
Sonnenberg — Yea
Woodward — Yea
Zenzinger — Yea
Fenberg — Yea
Jaquez Lewis — Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Not Voting
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Not Voting
Julie Gonzales Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tammy Story Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Yea
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Larry Liston Republican Yea
Ty Winter Republican Yea

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HJR 22-1002?
HJR 22-1002 is sponsored by Rachel Zenzinger, Dennis Hisey, Janice Rich, and Andres Pico.
What is the current status of HJR 22-1002?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 12, 2022. Enacted.
Where can I track HJR 22-1002?
Track HJR 22-1002 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HJR 22-1002

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HJR 22-1002

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →