Wage Theft Employee Misclassification Enforcement
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 22-161 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 22-161.
You're tracking SB 22-161
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 22-161 — Wage Theft Employee Misclassification Enforcement
Last action — Governor Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 21, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The act updates and modifies laws pertaining to the payment of wages and employee misclassification, and the enforcement procedures and remedies for violations of those laws, as follows: Changes the penalties for failure to provide requested information to the division of labor standards and statistics in the department of labor and employment (DLSS) or for hindering or obstructing the director of the DLSS or other person authorized by the director in accessing an employer's premises from a misdemeanor criminal offense to a daily penalty of not less than $50 (sections 1 and 2 of the act); Directs the DLSS to transmit penalties it imposes to the wage theft enforcement fund (sections 1 through 5 and 10); Requires an employer to: Provide notice to an employee, within 10 days after the employment terminates, before deducting from wages or compensation any amount of money or property the employee failed to return or repay upon termination of employment and pay the employee the deducted amount within 14 days after the employee returns or repays the money or property if the employee did so within 14 days after notice is provided (section 6); Imposes automatic penalties of the greater of 2 times the amount of the unpaid wages or $1,000 on an employer that fails to pay all past-due wages within 14 days after a written demand or civil or administrative action for the past-due wages is sent to or served on the employer. If an employee shows that the employer's failure or refusal to pay wages was willful, the employer is subject to penalties equal to the greater of 3 times the amount of unpaid wages or $3,000. The act further states that an employer's second or subsequent failure or refusal to pay wages of the same or similar type within the 5 years preceding a claim is considered per se willful (section 7). If an employer makes a full legal tender of all amounts demanded in good faith within 14 days after a written demand is sent or an administrative claim or civil action is sent or served, the employee is required to dismiss the action (section 7); Eliminates the authority of a court to award an employer reasonable attorney fees and costs in an action in which the employee claimed wages in excess of the greater of $7,500 or the jurisdictional limit for small claims court and the employee does not recover an amount greater than the amount the employer tendered and instead permits a court to award an employer reasonable attorney fees and costs if, within 14 days after a written demand is sent or a civil action is served, the employer makes full legal tender of all amounts demanded in good faith for all employees and the employees ultimately fail to recover a total sum that is greater than the amount tendered (section 8); Allows the DLSS to award an employee reasonable costs incurred in an administrative claim when the employee recovers a sum that is greater than the amount the employer tendered, and, if the employee recovers more than $5,000 in unpaid wages, allows the DLSS to also award the employee attorney fees (section 8); Allows the director of the DLSS to use existing authority under labor laws to gather information pertinent to wage claims from employers, employees, and other persons or entities (section 9); Allows recovery of attorney fees, an additional fine of 50% of the amount of past-due wages, and a penalty of the greater of 50% of past-due wages or $3,000 from an employer that fails to pay an employee past-due wages within 60 days after the determination in favor of the employee (section 9); For a citation, notice of assessment, or order issued against an employer on or after January 1, 2023, requires the DLSS, upon request of an employee, to file a certified copy of the citation, notice, or order with the appropriate clerk of court, after which the clerk is required to enter the citation, notice, or order as a judgment of the court, and the judgment is sufficient to support the issuance of writs of garnishment if the judgment is wholly or partially unsatisfied (section 10); On or after January 1, 2023, authorizes the DLSS, either on its own initiative or within 60 days after receiving a written request from an employee, to issue a notice of administrative lien and levy, similar to a child support enforcement lien, when an employer fails to pay past-due wages, fines, or penalties, which lien attaches to the employer's real or personal property that is in the possession, custody, or control of another person (section 10); Allows an employee who alleges that the employee's employer discriminated or retaliated against the employee for filing or participating in a wage claim to file a civil action to seek relief, including back pay, reinstatement or front pay, payment of unlawfully withheld wages, interest on past-due wages, penalties, liquidated damages, injunctive relief, and attorney fees and costs. The DLSS, after an investigation of a discrimination or retaliation claim, may also order similar relief to an employee, other than attorney fees and costs (section 11). Establishes the worker and employee protection unit (unit) in the department of law to investigate and enforce wage theft and unemployment insurance and misclassification of employees claims under specified circumstances and requires the director of the DLSS to share with the unit any orders the director issued in the previous 12 months finding that an employer has misclassified employees (sections 12 through 15). Section 16 appropriates $345,069 to the department of labor and employment for the 2022-23 state fiscal year to implement the act as follows: $314,019 for use by the DLSS for program costs, including an additional 3.4 FTE; and $31,050 to purchase legal services, which amount is reappropriated to the department of law to provide legal services to the department of labor and employment. Section 16 also appropriates $95,200 to the department of law for the 2022-23 state fiscal year for use by consumer protection to implement the act, which amount assumes the department will require an additional 0.8 FTE. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
24 added · 19 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill SB 22-161 primarily update the penalties for employers and employees who fail to provide required information to the division overseeing employer-employee relationships. Specifically, the penalty for employers has increased from $200 to a minimum of $50, while the fine for employees remains at $25. This change aims to encourage compliance with information requests and modernize enforcement procedures in the workplace. By lowering the fine for employers, the bill seeks to ensure that penalties are more proportional and promote better reporting practices.
Second Regular Session Seventy-third General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO ENGROSSEDREENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
22-0835.01 Christy Chase x2008 SENATE BILL 22-161 SENATE SPONSORSHIP Danielson and Jaquez Lewis, Buckner,Ginal,Gonzales,Hansen,Kolker,Lee, Moreno, Pettersen, Rodriguez, Story HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Duran and Froelich, Senate Committees House Committees Business, Labor, & Technology Appropriations A BILL FOR AN ACT CONCERNINGC ONCERNING THE MODERNIZATION OF PROCEDURES FOR THE E N F O R C E M E N T O F L A W S G O V E R N I N G T H E EMPLOYER -EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIP , AND , IN CONNECTION THEREWITH ,MAKING, MAKING AN APPROPRIATION .
Bill Summary d d e 2 (Note:
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does E a 0 notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill A U , N i 3 passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that S a a applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at R M r http://leg.colorado.gov.) 3 The bill updates and modifies laws pertaining to the payment of g wages, employee misclassification, and workplace safety, and the di enforcement procedures and remedies for violations of those laws, as ea E R 2 T Rd 02 AN n2 ,2 Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
ES de ya Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing statune.M Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.
Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.
View plain text versions (10)
- Engrossed Reengrossed (05/03/2022) pdf
- Engrossed Engrossed (05/02/2022) Current pdf
- Signed Act (06/03/2022) View text pdf
- Final Act (05/20/2022) View text pdf
- Rerevised (05/10/2022) View text pdf
- Revised (05/05/2022) View text pdf
- PA3 (05/05/2022) View text pdf
- PA2 (05/02/2022) View text pdf
- PA1 (04/21/2022) View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced (03/21/2022) pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Sent to the Governor
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
-
House Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
House Committee on Business Affairs & Labor Refer Unamended to Appropriations
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs & Labor
-
Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Refer Amended to Appropriations
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology
Sponsors
- Meg Froelich · Primary
- Monica Duran · Primary
- Jessie Danielson · Primary
- Jaquez Lewis · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 98 not signed on · 14 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- Meg Froelich Democrat
- Monica Duran Democrat
- Jessie Danielson Democrat
- Jaquez Lewis
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (98)
98 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 98 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| Cooke | — | Nay |
| Coram | — | Nay |
| Donovan | — | Yea |
| Fields | — | Yea |
| Gardner | — | Nay |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Hisey | — | Nay |
| Holbert | — | Nay |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Nay |
| Moreno | — | Yea |
| Pettersen | — | Yea |
| Priola | — | Nay |
| Rankin | — | Nay |
| Scott | — | Nay |
| Smallwood | — | Nay |
| Sonnenberg | — | Nay |
| Woodward | — | Nay |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| Fenberg | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| Cooke | — | Yea |
| Coram | — | Yea |
| Donovan | — | Yea |
| Fields | — | Yea |
| Gardner | — | Yea |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Hisey | — | Yea |
| Holbert | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Yea |
| Moreno | — | Yea |
| Pettersen | — | Yea |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Rankin | — | Yea |
| Scott | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Yea |
| Sonnenberg | — | Yea |
| Woodward | — | Yea |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| Fenberg | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 41 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 37% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bernett | — | Yea |
| Bird | — | Yea |
| Bockenfeld | — | Nay |
| Caraveo | — | Yea |
| Carver | — | Nay |
| Esgar | — | Yea |
| Geitner | — | Nay |
| Gonzales-Gutierrez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Hanks | — | Nay |
| Herod | — | Yea |
| Holtorf | — | Nay |
| Hooton | — | Yea |
| Larson | — | Nay |
| Lontine | — | Yea |
| Lynch | — | Nay |
| McKean | — | Nay |
| McLachlan | — | Yea |
| Neville | — | Nay |
| Ortiz | — | Yea |
| Pico | — | Nay |
| Ransom | — | Nay |
| Sandridge | — | Nay |
| Tipper | — | Yea |
| Will | — | Nay |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Garnett | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Michaelson Jenet | — | Yea |
| Valdez D. | — | Yea |
| Van Beber | — | Nay |
| Van Winkle | — | Nay |
| Williams D. | — | Nay |
| deGruy Kennedy | — | Yea |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Woog | Republican | Nay |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Nay |
| Rod Pelton | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| Cooke | — | Nay |
| Coram | — | Nay |
| Donovan | — | Yea |
| Fields | — | Yea |
| Gardner | — | Nay |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Hisey | — | Nay |
| Holbert | — | Nay |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Nay |
| Moreno | — | Yea |
| Pettersen | — | Yea |
| Priola | — | Nay |
| Rankin | — | Nay |
| Scott | — | Nay |
| Smallwood | — | Nay |
| Sonnenberg | — | Nay |
| Woodward | — | Nay |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| Fenberg | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 22-161 do?
- The act updates and modifies laws pertaining to the payment of wages and employee misclassification, and the enforcement procedures and remedies for violations of those laws, as follows: Changes the penalties for failure to provide requested information to the division of labor standards and statistics in the department of labor and employment (DLSS) or for hindering or obstructing the director of the DLSS or other person authorized by the director in accessing an employer's premises from a misdemeanor criminal offense to a daily penalty of not less than $50 (sections 1 and 2 of the act); Directs the DLSS to transmit penalties it imposes to the wage theft enforcement fund (sections 1 through 5 and 10); Requires an employer to: Provide notice to an employee, within 10 days after the employment terminates, before deducting from wages or compensation any amount of money or property the employee failed to return or repay upon termination of employment and pay the employee the deducted amount within 14 days after the employee returns or repays the money or property if the employee did so within 14 days after notice is provided (section 6); Imposes automatic penalties of the greater of 2 times the amount of the unpaid wages or $1,000 on an employer that fails to pay all past-due wages within 14 days after a written demand or civil or administrative action for the past-due wages is sent to or served on the employer. If an employee shows that the employer's failure or refusal to pay wages was willful, the employer is subject to penalties equal to the greater of 3 times the amount of unpaid wages or $3,000. The act further states that an employer's second or subsequent failure or refusal to pay wages of the same or similar type within the 5 years preceding a claim is considered per se willful (section 7). If an employer makes a full legal tender of all amounts demanded in good faith within 14 days after a written demand is sent or an administrative claim or civil action is sent or served, the employee is required to dismiss the action (section 7); Eliminates the authority of a court to award an employer reasonable attorney fees and costs in an action in which the employee claimed wages in excess of the greater of $7,500 or the jurisdictional limit for small claims court and the employee does not recover an amount greater than the amount the employer tendered and instead permits a court to award an employer reasonable attorney fees and costs if, within 14 days after a written demand is sent or a civil action is served, the employer makes full legal tender of all amounts demanded in good faith for all employees and the employees ultimately fail to recover a total sum that is greater than the amount tendered (section 8); Allows the DLSS to award an employee reasonable costs incurred in an administrative claim when the employee recovers a sum that is greater than the amount the employer tendered, and, if the employee recovers more than $5,000 in unpaid wages, allows the DLSS to also award the employee attorney fees (section 8); Allows the director of the DLSS to use existing authority under labor laws to gather information pertinent to wage claims from employers, employees, and other persons or entities (section 9); Allows recovery of attorney fees, an additional fine of 50% of the amount of past-due wages, and a penalty of the greater of 50% of past-due wages or $3,000 from an employer that fails to pay an employee past-due wages within 60 days after the determination in favor of the employee (section 9); For a citation, notice of assessment, or order issued against an employer on or after January 1, 2023, requires the DLSS, upon request of an employee, to file a certified copy of the citation, notice, or order with the appropriate clerk of court, after which the clerk is required to enter the citation, notice, or order as a judgment of the court, and the judgment is sufficient to support the issuance of writs of garnishment if the judgment is wholly or partially unsatisfied (section 10); On or after January 1, 2023, authorizes the DLSS, either on its own initiative or within 60 days after receiving a written request from an employee, to issue a notice of administrative lien and levy, similar to a child support enforcement lien, when an employer fails to pay past-due wages, fines, or penalties, which lien attaches to the employer's real or personal property that is in the possession, custody, or control of another person (section 10); Allows an employee who alleges that the employee's employer discriminated or retaliated against the employee for filing or participating in a wage claim to file a civil action to seek relief, including back pay, reinstatement or front pay, payment of unlawfully withheld wages, interest on past-due wages, penalties, liquidated damages, injunctive relief, and attorney fees and costs. The DLSS, after an investigation of a discrimination or retaliation claim, may also order similar relief to an employee, other than attorney fees and costs (section 11). Establishes the worker and employee protection unit (unit) in the department of law to investigate and enforce wage theft and unemployment insurance and misclassification of employees claims under specified circumstances and requires the director of the DLSS to share with the unit any orders the director issued in the previous 12 months finding that an employer has misclassified employees (sections 12 through 15). Section 16 appropriates $345,069 to the department of labor and employment for the 2022-23 state fiscal year to implement the act as follows: $314,019 for use by the DLSS for program costs, including an additional 3.4 FTE; and $31,050 to purchase legal services, which amount is reappropriated to the department of law to provide legal services to the department of labor and employment. Section 16 also appropriates $95,200 to the department of law for the 2022-23 state fiscal year for use by consumer protection to implement the act, which amount assumes the department will require an additional 0.8 FTE. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors SB 22-161?
- SB 22-161 is sponsored by Meg Froelich (Democrat), Monica Duran (Democrat), Jessie Danielson (Democrat), and Jaquez Lewis.
- What is the current status of SB 22-161?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 21, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 22-161?
- Track SB 22-161 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 22-161
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 22-161
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →