Opiate Antagonist Bulk Purchase And Standing Orders
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 21-122 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 21-122.
You're tracking SB 21-122
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 21-122 — Opiate Antagonist Bulk Purchase And Standing Orders
Last action — Governor Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Current law allows specific entities to purchase opiate antagonists through the opiate antagonist bulk purchase fund (fund) and also allows specific entities to receive opiate antagonists pursuant to standing orders and protocols. The act aligns these sections of law so that:A unit of local government may purchase opiate antagonists through the fund pursuant to a standing order and protocol; and A harm reduction organization, law enforcement agency, or first responder to which opiate antagonists have been prescribed or dispensed through a standing order and protocol may purchase the opiate antagonists through the fund.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
20 added · 15 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of the bill clarifies that current law permits certain entities to purchase opiate antagonists through the opiate antagonist bulk purchase fund. It also specifies that a local government unit can make these purchases under a standing order. The changes ensure that the text reflects the amendments adopted in the legislative process and provides a clearer framework for understanding who can access the fund.
First Regular Session Seventy-third General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO ENGROSSEDREENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does d notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill d passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that e 2 E a 2 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at T U 6 http://leg.colorado.gov.) N g 1 S d r e a Currentlawallowsspecificentitiestopurchaseopiateantagonists d M through the opiate antagonist bulk purchase fund (fund) and also allows 3 specific entities to receive opiate antagonists pursuant to standing orders and protocols.
ed ! A unit of local government may purchase opiate nd 1 antagonists through the fund pursuant to a standing order me 02 TE na ,2 A U 2 N gn 1 Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
ES da cr Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing statute.
View plain text versions (7)
- Engrossed Reengrossed (03/16/2021) pdf
- Engrossed Engrossed (03/12/2021) Current pdf
- Signed Act (04/15/2021) View text pdf
- Final Act (04/08/2021) View text pdf
- Rerevised (04/05/2021) View text pdf
- Revised (04/01/2021) View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced (02/23/2021) pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Sent to the Governor
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Public & Behavioral Health & Human Services Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Public & Behavioral Health & Human Services
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Committee on Health & Human Services Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Health & Human Services
Sponsors
- Joann Ginal · Primary
- Meg Froelich · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 100 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Joann Ginal
- Meg Froelich Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (100)
100 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 100 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 64 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Arndt | — | Yea |
| Bernett | — | Yea |
| Bird | — | Yea |
| Bockenfeld | — | Yea |
| Caraveo | — | Yea |
| Carver | — | Yea |
| Esgar | — | Yea |
| Geitner | — | Yea |
| Gonzales-Gutierrez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Hanks | — | Yea |
| Herod | — | Yea |
| Holtorf | — | Yea |
| Hooton | — | Yea |
| Larson | — | Yea |
| Lontine | — | Yea |
| Lynch | — | Yea |
| McKean | — | Yea |
| McLachlan | — | Yea |
| Neville | — | Yea |
| Ortiz | — | Yea |
| Sandridge | — | Yea |
| Tipper | — | Yea |
| Will | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Garnett | — | Yea |
| Pico | — | Yea |
| Ransom | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Michaelson Jenet | — | Yea |
| Valdez D. | — | Yea |
| Van Beber | — | Yea |
| Van Winkle | — | Yea |
| Williams D. | — | Yea |
| deGruy Kennedy | — | Yea |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Jackson | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Woog | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Not Voting |
| Rod Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| Cooke | — | Yea |
| Coram | — | Yea |
| Donovan | — | Yea |
| Fenberg | — | Yea |
| Fields | — | Not Voting |
| Gardner | — | Yea |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Hisey | — | Yea |
| Holbert | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Not Voting |
| Moreno | — | Yea |
| Pettersen | — | Yea |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Rankin | — | Not Voting |
| Scott | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Yea |
| Sonnenberg | — | Yea |
| Woodward | — | Yea |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 21-122 do?
- Current law allows specific entities to purchase opiate antagonists through the opiate antagonist bulk purchase fund (fund) and also allows specific entities to receive opiate antagonists pursuant to standing orders and protocols. The act aligns these sections of law so that:A unit of local government may purchase opiate antagonists through the fund pursuant to a standing order and protocol; and A harm reduction organization, law enforcement agency, or first responder to which opiate antagonists have been prescribed or dispensed through a standing order and protocol may purchase the opiate antagonists through the fund.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors SB 21-122?
- SB 21-122 is sponsored by Joann Ginal and Meg Froelich (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 21-122?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 21-122?
- Track SB 21-122 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 21-122
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 21-122
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →