HB 21-1237 — Competitive Pharmacy Benefits Manager Marketplace
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 22, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The department of personnel (department) is required to contract for the services of a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) for group benefit plans provided pursuant to the "State Employees Group Benefits Act" (state employee group benefits plans) and to procure a technology platform with the required capabilities for conducting a PBM reverse auction and the related services of a technology platform operator.The department is required to repurpose the technology platform used to conduct the reverse auction over the duration of the PBM services contract to perform reviews of all invoiced PBM prescription drug claims, and to identify all deviations from the specific terms of the PBM services contract. The department is required to reconcile the electronically adjudicated pharmacy claims with PBM invoices to ensure that state payments do not exceed the terms specified in any PBM services contract.Each PBM reverse auction is required to be completed and the PBM services contract awarded to the winning PBM within a specified timeline.The department may perform a market check for providing PBM services during the term of the current PBM services contract to ensure continuing competitiveness of incumbent prescription drug pricing over the life of a PBM services contract.To ensure that the department does not incur additional expenditures associated with the requirements of the act, the department is required to implement a no-pay option that obligates the winning PBM to pay the cost of the technology platform and related technology platform operator services by assessing a per-prescription fee and requiring the PBM to pay these fees to the technology operator over the duration of the PBM services contract.The act allows other health plans to use the processes and procedures established in the act individually, collectively, or as a joint purchasing group with the state employee group benefits plans.After completion of the first state employees group benefits plans PBM reverse auction, self-funded private sector employer or multi-employer health plans have the option to participate in a joint purchasing pool with state employees for conduct of subsequent PBM reverse auctions.The state employees group benefits plans and any self-funded public or private sector health plans that opt to participate with the state employees group benefits plans in a joint PBM reverse auction purchasing pool shall retain full autonomy over determination of their respective prescription drug formularies and pharmacy benefit designs and shall not be required to adopt a common prescription drug formulary or common prescription pharmacy benefit design.Any PBM providing services to the department or a self-funded public or private sector employee health plan is required to provide the department and the plan access to complete pharmacy claims data necessary to conduct the reverse auction and carry out their administrative and management duties.The department may elect to vacate the outcome of a PBM reverse auction if the lowest cost bid is not less than the projected cost trend for the incumbent PBM contract as verified by the department.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
354 added · 288 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill has undergone changes where specific language related to legislative sponsorship and bill summaries has been added or removed. Notably, the new version now includes a statement indicating that the summary applies to the bill as introduced and may not reflect future amendments. This matters because it clarifies the context of the summary, helping readers understand that changes could occur as the bill progresses.
First Regular Session Seventy-third General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO ENGROSSEDREENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
21-0210.01 Jason Gelender x4330 HOUSE BILL 21-1237 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP LontineandRich,Lontine Amabile,Bradfield,Caraveo,Cutter,Kennedy,MichaelsonJenet,Ortiz,and Rich, Amabile, Bradfield, Caraveo, Cutter, Kennedy, Michaelson Jenet, Ortiz, Ricks, Roberts, Will, YoungYoung, Bernett, Bird, Boesenecker, Duran, Esgar, Exum, Gray, Hooton, Jackson, McCluskie, McCormick, Mullica, Snyder, Titone, Valdez D., Weissman SENATE SPONSORSHIP Kirkmeyer and Moreno, House Committees Senate Committees Health & Insurance A BILL FOR AN ACT C ONCERNINGTHECREATIONOFACOMPETITIVEPHARMACYBENEFITS MANAGER MARKETPLACE .
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill e n passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that m 1 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at E n 0 U U , http://leg.colorado.gov.) O i y H a a The department of personnel (department) is required to contract R M r for the services of a pharmacybenefit manager (PBM) for group benefit 3 plans provided pursuant to the "State Employees Group Benefits Act" (state employee group benefits plans) and to procure a technology platform with the required capabilities for conducting a PBM reverse i 1a 2 auction and the related services of a technology platform operator.
aE 0e S2 RU ,d 0 O n2 3i Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
H 2d rp Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing sdatute.statude.
e m A The department is required to repurpose the technology platform usedtoconductthereverseauctionoverthedurationofthePBMservices contracttoperformreviewsofallinvoicedPBMprescriptiondrugclaims, andtoidentifyalldeviationsfromthespecifictermsof thePBMservices contract.
View plain text versions (8)
- Engrossed Reengrossed (05/04/2021) pdf
- Engrossed Engrossed (05/03/2021) Current pdf
- Signed Act (06/07/2021) View text pdf
- Final Act (05/28/2021) View text pdf
- Rerevised (05/18/2021) View text pdf
- Revised (05/17/2021) View text pdf
- PA1 (04/22/2021) View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced (03/22/2021) pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Committee on Health & Human Services Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Health & Human Services
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Health & Insurance Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Health & Insurance
Sponsors
- Susan Lontine · Primary
- Janice Rich · Primary
- Barbara Kirkmeyer · Primary
- Dominick Moreno · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 97 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- Susan Lontine
- Janice Rich
- Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican
- Dominick Moreno
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (97)
97 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 97 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 20% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| Cooke | — | Nay |
| Coram | — | Yea |
| Donovan | — | Yea |
| Fenberg | — | Yea |
| Fields | — | Yea |
| Gardner | — | Nay |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Hisey | — | Yea |
| Holbert | — | Nay |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Nay |
| Moreno | — | Yea |
| Pettersen | — | Yea |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Rankin | — | Yea |
| Scott | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Nay |
| Sonnenberg | — | Nay |
| Woodward | — | Nay |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 52 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 17% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holtorf | — | Nay |
| Hooton | — | Yea |
| Larson | — | Nay |
| Lontine | — | Yea |
| Lynch | — | Yea |
| McKean | — | Nay |
| McLachlan | — | Yea |
| Neville | — | Nay |
| Ortiz | — | Yea |
| Pico | — | Not Voting |
| Ransom | — | Nay |
| Sandridge | — | Nay |
| Tipper | — | Yea |
| Will | — | Nay |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Garnett | — | Yea |
| Bernett | — | Yea |
| Bird | — | Yea |
| Bockenfeld | — | Yea |
| Caraveo | — | Yea |
| Carver | — | Yea |
| Esgar | — | Yea |
| Geitner | — | Nay |
| Gonzales-Gutierrez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Hanks | — | Nay |
| Herod | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Michaelson Jenet | — | Yea |
| Valdez D. | — | Yea |
| Van Beber | — | Yea |
| Van Winkle | — | Yea |
| Williams D. | — | Yea |
| deGruy Kennedy | — | Yea |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Jackson | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Woog | Republican | Nay |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Rod Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 21-1237 do?
- The department of personnel (department) is required to contract for the services of a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) for group benefit plans provided pursuant to the "State Employees Group Benefits Act" (state employee group benefits plans) and to procure a technology platform with the required capabilities for conducting a PBM reverse auction and the related services of a technology platform operator.The department is required to repurpose the technology platform used to conduct the reverse auction over the duration of the PBM services contract to perform reviews of all invoiced PBM prescription drug claims, and to identify all deviations from the specific terms of the PBM services contract. The department is required to reconcile the electronically adjudicated pharmacy claims with PBM invoices to ensure that state payments do not exceed the terms specified in any PBM services contract.Each PBM reverse auction is required to be completed and the PBM services contract awarded to the winning PBM within a specified timeline.The department may perform a market check for providing PBM services during the term of the current PBM services contract to ensure continuing competitiveness of incumbent prescription drug pricing over the life of a PBM services contract.To ensure that the department does not incur additional expenditures associated with the requirements of the act, the department is required to implement a no-pay option that obligates the winning PBM to pay the cost of the technology platform and related technology platform operator services by assessing a per-prescription fee and requiring the PBM to pay these fees to the technology operator over the duration of the PBM services contract.The act allows other health plans to use the processes and procedures established in the act individually, collectively, or as a joint purchasing group with the state employee group benefits plans.After completion of the first state employees group benefits plans PBM reverse auction, self-funded private sector employer or multi-employer health plans have the option to participate in a joint purchasing pool with state employees for conduct of subsequent PBM reverse auctions.The state employees group benefits plans and any self-funded public or private sector health plans that opt to participate with the state employees group benefits plans in a joint PBM reverse auction purchasing pool shall retain full autonomy over determination of their respective prescription drug formularies and pharmacy benefit designs and shall not be required to adopt a common prescription drug formulary or common prescription pharmacy benefit design.Any PBM providing services to the department or a self-funded public or private sector employee health plan is required to provide the department and the plan access to complete pharmacy claims data necessary to conduct the reverse auction and carry out their administrative and management duties.The department may elect to vacate the outcome of a PBM reverse auction if the lowest cost bid is not less than the projected cost trend for the incumbent PBM contract as verified by the department.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors HB 21-1237?
- HB 21-1237 is sponsored by Susan Lontine, Janice Rich, Barbara Kirkmeyer (Republican), and Dominick Moreno.
- What is the current status of HB 21-1237?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 22, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 21-1237?
- Track HB 21-1237 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 21-1237
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 21-1237
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →