Requirements For Jailhouse Witness Testimony
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 20-1102 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 20-1102.
You're tracking HB 20-1102
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 20-1102 — Requirements For Jailhouse Witness Testimony
Last action — Senate Committee on Judiciary Postpone Indefinitely
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The bill requires each district attorney's office to maintain a central record that tracks each case in which a jailhouse witness is endorsed by the state to testify against a suspect or defendant's interest. Each district attorney's office shall send the information to the Colorado district attorneys' council, which shall maintain a statewide record of the information division of criminal justice in the department of public safety on a monthly basis to be maintained in a centralized statewide record that is available to district attorneys throughout the state . The information is not subject to open records requests. A district attorney shall disclose all jailhouse witnesses who have been endorsed by the state and specified information pursuant to rule 16 of the Colorado rules of criminal procedure. In a criminal prosecution for homicide or sexual assault in which the state intends to introduce the testimony of a jailhouse witness, upon a motion of the defendant, the court shall conduct a pre-trial hearing to determine whether the jailhouse witness's testimony is admissible based upon specified factors. Unless the district attorney shows by a preponderance of the evidence that the jailhouse witness's testimony is reliable based on the specified factors, the court shall not allow the testimony to be heard at trial. If a jailhouse witness's testimony is admitted into evidence, the court shall may instruct the jurors to consider specific factors when assessing the jailhouse witness's testimony. If a jailhouse witness receives leniency related to a pending charge, a conviction, or a sentence for a crime against a victim, in connection with offering or providing testimony against a suspect or defendant, the prosecutor shall notify the victim. The bill appropriates $16,860 from the general fund to the department of public safety which is reappropriated to the office of information technology for information technology services to implement the act. (Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.) (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
22 added · 15 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment changes the heading from "ENGROSSED" to "REENGROSSED" and updates the acknowledgement of all amendments from "on Second Reading" to "in the House of Introduction." It specifies that the Colorado district attorneys' council will keep a statewide record, but the core process remains unchanged. This difference in wording clarifies the legislative process and tracking of amendments, while the record-keeping responsibility stays the same.
Second Regular Session Seventy-second General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO ENGROSSEDREENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
20-0824.01 Michael Dohr x4347 HOUSE BILL 20-1102 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP TipperTipperandSoper, andBuckner,Duran,Gonzales-Gutierrez,Herod,Kennedy,Singer,Valdez Soper,A., Weissman, Woodrow SENATE SPONSORSHIP Lee and Priola, House Committees Senate Committees Judiciary Appropriations A BILL FOR AN ACT C ONCERNING REQUIRED PROCEDURES TO PROTECT THE DEFENDANT WHEN JAILHOUSE WITNESSES ARE USED IN A CRIMINAL CASE , AND ,INCONNECTIONTHEREWITH ,MAKINGANAPPROPRIATION .
Bill Summary d (Note:
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does d notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill e 2 E a 2 passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that S U 4 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at O i h H a a http://leg.colorado.gov.) R M r Thebillrequireseachdistrictattorney'sofficetomaintainacentral record that tracks each case in which a jailhouse witness is endorsed by the state to testify against a suspect or defendant's interest.
Each district n attorney's office shall send the information to the Colorado district id 02 a 0 attorneys' council, which shall maintain a statewide record of the SE Re ,2 U d 3 O n2 hc Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
H 2d ra Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing sdatute.statude.M Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.
Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.
View plain text versions (5)
- Engrossed Reengrossed (03/04/2020) pdf
- Engrossed Engrossed (03/03/2020) Current pdf
- PA2 (02/28/2020) View text pdf
- PA1 (01/31/2020) View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced (01/14/2020) pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Senate Committee on Judiciary Postpone Indefinitely
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary + Appropriations
Sponsors
- Kevin Priola · Primary
- Pete Lee · Primary
- Matt Soper · Primary
- Kerry Tipper · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 98 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- Kevin Priola
- Pete Lee
- Matt Soper Republican
- Kerry Tipper
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (98)
98 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 98 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 37 | 27 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 42% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Arndt | — | Yea |
| Bird | — | Yea |
| Bockenfeld | — | Nay |
| Buck | — | Nay |
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| Buentello | — | Yea |
| Caraveo | — | Yea |
| Carver | — | Nay |
| Champion | — | Nay |
| Esgar | — | Yea |
| Garnett | — | Yea |
| Geitner | — | Nay |
| Gonzales-Gutierrez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Herod | — | Yea |
| Holtorf | — | Nay |
| Hooton | — | Yea |
| Humphrey | — | Nay |
| Kraft-Tharp | — | Yea |
| Landgraf | — | Nay |
| Larson | — | Nay |
| Lontine | — | Yea |
| McKean | — | Nay |
| McLachlan | — | Nay |
| Melton | — | Yea |
| Neville | — | Nay |
| Pelton | — | Nay |
| Ransom | — | Nay |
| Saine | — | Nay |
| Sandridge | — | Nay |
| Singer | — | Yea |
| Tipper | — | Yea |
| Valdez A. | — | Yea |
| Will | — | Nay |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Michaelson Jenet | — | Yea |
| Valdez D. | — | Nay |
| Van Winkle | — | Nay |
| Williams D. | — | Nay |
| deGruy Kennedy | — | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Nay |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Jackson | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 20-1102 do?
- The bill requires each district attorney's office to maintain a central record that tracks each case in which a jailhouse witness is endorsed by the state to testify against a suspect or defendant's interest. Each district attorney's office shall send the information to the Colorado district attorneys' council, which shall maintain a statewide record of the information division of criminal justice in the department of public safety on a monthly basis to be maintained in a centralized statewide record that is available to district attorneys throughout the state . The information is not subject to open records requests. A district attorney shall disclose all jailhouse witnesses who have been endorsed by the state and specified information pursuant to rule 16 of the Colorado rules of criminal procedure. In a criminal prosecution for homicide or sexual assault in which the state intends to introduce the testimony of a jailhouse witness, upon a motion of the defendant, the court shall conduct a pre-trial hearing to determine whether the jailhouse witness's testimony is admissible based upon specified factors. Unless the district attorney shows by a preponderance of the evidence that the jailhouse witness's testimony is reliable based on the specified factors, the court shall not allow the testimony to be heard at trial. If a jailhouse witness's testimony is admitted into evidence, the court shall may instruct the jurors to consider specific factors when assessing the jailhouse witness's testimony. If a jailhouse witness receives leniency related to a pending charge, a conviction, or a sentence for a crime against a victim, in connection with offering or providing testimony against a suspect or defendant, the prosecutor shall notify the victim. The bill appropriates $16,860 from the general fund to the department of public safety which is reappropriated to the office of information technology for information technology services to implement the act. (Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.) (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
- Who sponsors HB 20-1102?
- HB 20-1102 is sponsored by Kevin Priola, Pete Lee, Matt Soper (Republican), and Kerry Tipper.
- What is the current status of HB 20-1102?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 20-1102?
- Track HB 20-1102 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 20-1102
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 20-1102
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →