Commissions On Judicial Performance
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 19-187 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 19-187.
You're tracking SB 19-187
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 19-187 — Commissions On Judicial Performance
Last action — Governor Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 07, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Commissions on judicial performance - senior judges - vacancies - surveys. Currently, senior judges are evaluated by the state commission on judicial performance (state commission). The act repeals this provision and makes conforming amendments. Under current law, for a vacancy on a state or district commission on judicial performance, if the appointing authority does not appoint a replacement within 45 days after the vacancy arises, the governor appoints a replacement member of the commission. The act changes this from the governor to the state commission. The act provides that surveys of justices and judges are to be distributed primarily through electronic means and directs the state commission to make efforts to locate electronic addresses for persons who use the courts. For rules of the state commission, the act clarifies that they may provide for a matrix or scorecard to evaluate a judge or justice and repeals the requirement that the rules contain a threshold for deciding whether a judge or justice meets a performance standard. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.) Read More
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
18 added · 23 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill changes the authority for appointing a replacement member of the commission from the governor to the state commission. It also adds a provision that surveys developed for individuals interacting with the court must be distributed primarily through electronic means, and the state commission is tasked with finding electronic mail addresses for those parties. These adjustments aim to streamline the appointment process and enhance the accessibility and distribution of surveys among relevant stakeholders.
First Regular Session Seventy-second General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REENGROSSEDENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
19-0974.01 Jerry Barry x4341 SENATE BILL 19-187 SENATE SPONSORSHIP Lee and Gardner, Tate HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Bird(None), and McKean, Senate Committees House Committees Judiciary A BILL FOR AN ACT C ONCERNING COMMISSIONS ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE .
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that e applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at n m 9 http://leg.colorado.gov.) T n 0 A U , Currently, senior judges are evaluated bythestate commission on E i i S a p judicial performance.
The bill repeals this provision and makes R A conforming amendments.
r Under current law,for a vacancyon a state or district commission on judicial performance, if the appointing authority does not appoint a g replacement within 45 days after the vacancy arises, the governor ig d appointsareplacementmemberof thecommission.Thebill changesthis ae 9 from the governor to the state commission.
ET R 02 A d , N 2 l8 Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
SE ed pr Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing statune.A Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.
Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.
View plain text versions (8)
- Engrossed Engrossed (04/08/2019) pdf
- Engrossed Reengrossed (04/09/2019) Current pdf
- PA1 (04/04/2019) View text pdf
- Revised (04/24/2019) View text pdf
- Rerevised (04/26/2019) View text pdf
- Final Act (05/09/2019) View text pdf
- Signed Act (05/30/2019) View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced (03/07/2019) pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
-
Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
Sponsors
- Bob Gardner · Primary
- Pete Lee · Primary
- Shannon Bird · Primary
- Hugh McKean · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 98 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Bob Gardner
- Pete Lee
- Shannon Bird
- Hugh McKean
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (98)
98 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 98 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 19-187 do?
- Commissions on judicial performance - senior judges - vacancies - surveys. Currently, senior judges are evaluated by the state commission on judicial performance (state commission). The act repeals this provision and makes conforming amendments. Under current law, for a vacancy on a state or district commission on judicial performance, if the appointing authority does not appoint a replacement within 45 days after the vacancy arises, the governor appoints a replacement member of the commission. The act changes this from the governor to the state commission. The act provides that surveys of justices and judges are to be distributed primarily through electronic means and directs the state commission to make efforts to locate electronic addresses for persons who use the courts. For rules of the state commission, the act clarifies that they may provide for a matrix or scorecard to evaluate a judge or justice and repeals the requirement that the rules contain a threshold for deciding whether a judge or justice meets a performance standard. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.) Read More
- Who sponsors SB 19-187?
- SB 19-187 is sponsored by Bob Gardner, Pete Lee, Shannon Bird, and Hugh McKean.
- What is the current status of SB 19-187?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 07, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 19-187?
- Track SB 19-187 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 19-187
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 19-187
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →