Vision Care Plans Carriers Eye Care Providers
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 18-1012 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 18-1012.
You're tracking HB 18-1012
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 18-1012 — Vision Care Plans Carriers Eye Care Providers
Last action — Governor Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The bill prohibits a carrier or entity that offers a vision care plan from requiring an eye care provider with whom the carrier or entity contracts to: Provide services or materials to a covered person at a fee set by, or subject to the approval of, the carrier or entity unless certain conditions are met; Charge a covered person for noncovered services or noncovered materials in any amount less than the usual and customary amount that the eye care provider charges individuals who do not have coverage for such materials and services; or Participate, as a condition of participation in a vision plan, in any of the carrier's or entity's other vision plan networks. The bill prohibits a carrier or entity from changing the terms of a contract between the carrier or entity and an eye care provider without communication with the eye care provider. The bill requires the commissioner of insurance to institute a corrective action plan or use any of the commissioner's enforcement powers against a carrier or entity that is not in compliance with the above requirements. (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.) , Read More
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
16 added · 19 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill now specifies that a carrier or entity offering a vision care plan cannot require an eye care provider to charge a covered person for noncovered services or noncovered materials unless certain conditions are met. This change clarifies the conditions under which charges for noncovered items can be applied, affecting how eye care providers interact with patients concerning billing for these services.
Second Regular Session Seventy-first General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REENGROSSEDENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that e applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at n 1 m 2 http://leg.colorado.gov.) E n 5 U U 1 The bill prohibits a carrier or entity that offers a vision care plan O i a H a r from requiring an eye care provider with whom the carrier or entity R e contracts to:
r F ! Provide services or materials to a covered person at a fee set by, or subject to the approval of, the carrier or entity unless certain conditions are met;
i 1 ! Charge a covered person for noncovered services or a 2, noncoveredmaterialsinanyamountlessthantheusualand ES eR 41 U d y O 2n ar Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
H d2 ru Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing statude.e Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.
e F m A customary amount that the eye care provider charges individuals who do not have coverage for such materials and services;
View plain text versions (9)
- Engrossed Engrossed (02/14/2018) pdf
- Engrossed Reengrossed (02/15/2018) Current pdf
- PA1 (02/09/2018) View text pdf
- PA2 (03/09/2018) View text pdf
- Revised (03/13/2018) View text pdf
- Rerevised (03/14/2018) View text pdf
- Final Act (03/21/2018) View text pdf
- Signed Act (03/29/2018) View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced (01/10/2018) pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Sent to the Governor
-
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
Senate Committee on Health & Human Services Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Health & Human Services
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
House Second Reading Laid Over to 02/14/2018 - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Health, Insurance, & Environment Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Health, Insurance, & Environment
Sponsors
- Jon Becker · Primary
- Susan Lontine · Primary
- Kevin Lundberg · Primary
- Irene Aguilar · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 98 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- Jon Becker
- Susan Lontine
- Kevin Lundberg
- Irene Aguilar
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (98)
98 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 98 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 28 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 14% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Court | — | Yea |
| Gardner | — | Nay |
| Kerr | — | Yea |
| Neville T. | — | Nay |
| Williams A. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Aguilar | — | Yea |
| Baumgardner | — | Yea |
| Cooke | — | Yea |
| Coram | — | Yea |
| Crowder | — | Yea |
| Donovan | — | Yea |
| Fenberg | — | Yea |
| Fields | — | Not Voting |
| Guzman | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Holbert | — | Yea |
| Jahn | — | Yea |
| Jones | — | Yea |
| Kagan | — | Yea |
| Kefalas | — | Yea |
| Lambert | — | Yea |
| Lundberg | — | Yea |
| Marble | — | Nay |
| Merrifield | — | Yea |
| Moreno | — | Yea |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Scott | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Nay |
| Sonnenberg | — | Yea |
| Tate | — | Nay |
| Todd | — | Yea |
| Zenzinger | — | Yea |
| Martinez Humenik | — | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 44 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 11% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (64)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Becker J. | — | Yea |
| Becker K. | — | Yea |
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| McLachlan | — | Yea |
| Neville P. | — | Nay |
| Salazar | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Arndt | — | Yea |
| Beckman | — | Yea |
| Buck | — | Yea |
| Carver | — | Yea |
| Covarrubias | — | Yea |
| Esgar | — | Yea |
| Everett | — | Nay |
| Foote | — | Yea |
| Garnett | — | Yea |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Hamner | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Herod | — | Yea |
| Hooton | — | Yea |
| Humphrey | — | Nay |
| Kraft-Tharp | — | Yea |
| Landgraf | — | Yea |
| Lawrence | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Leonard | — | Yea |
| Lontine | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Yea |
| McKean | — | Yea |
| Melton | — | Yea |
| Pabon | — | Yea |
| Pettersen | — | Yea |
| Rankin | — | Yea |
| Ransom | — | Nay |
| Reyher | — | Yea |
| Rosenthal | — | Yea |
| Saine | — | Yea |
| Sandridge | — | Nay |
| Sias | — | Yea |
| Singer | — | Yea |
| Thurlow | — | Yea |
| Willett | — | Yea |
| Wist | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Nay |
| Michaelson Jenet | — | Yea |
| Van Winkle | — | Yea |
| Williams D. | — | Nay |
| deGruy Kennedy | — | Yea |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Jackson | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 63 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 2% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (64)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McLachlan | — | Yea |
| Neville P. | — | Yea |
| Salazar | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Becker J. | — | Yea |
| Becker K. | — | Yea |
| Buckner | — | Yea |
| Arndt | — | Yea |
| Beckman | — | Yea |
| Buck | — | Yea |
| Carver | — | Yea |
| Covarrubias | — | Yea |
| Esgar | — | Nay |
| Everett | — | Yea |
| Foote | — | Yea |
| Garnett | — | Yea |
| Ginal | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Hansen | — | Yea |
| Hamner | — | Yea |
| Herod | — | Yea |
| Hooton | — | Yea |
| Humphrey | — | Yea |
| Kraft-Tharp | — | Yea |
| Landgraf | — | Yea |
| Lawrence | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Leonard | — | Yea |
| Lontine | — | Yea |
| Lundeen | — | Yea |
| McKean | — | Yea |
| Melton | — | Yea |
| Pabon | — | Yea |
| Pettersen | — | Yea |
| Rankin | — | Yea |
| Ransom | — | Yea |
| Reyher | — | Yea |
| Rosenthal | — | Yea |
| Saine | — | Yea |
| Sandridge | — | Yea |
| Sias | — | Yea |
| Singer | — | Yea |
| Thurlow | — | Yea |
| Willett | — | Yea |
| Wist | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Jaquez Lewis | — | Yea |
| Michaelson Jenet | — | Yea |
| Van Winkle | — | Yea |
| Williams D. | — | Yea |
| deGruy Kennedy | — | Yea |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Jackson | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 18-1012 do?
- The bill prohibits a carrier or entity that offers a vision care plan from requiring an eye care provider with whom the carrier or entity contracts to: Provide services or materials to a covered person at a fee set by, or subject to the approval of, the carrier or entity unless certain conditions are met; Charge a covered person for noncovered services or noncovered materials in any amount less than the usual and customary amount that the eye care provider charges individuals who do not have coverage for such materials and services; or Participate, as a condition of participation in a vision plan, in any of the carrier's or entity's other vision plan networks. The bill prohibits a carrier or entity from changing the terms of a contract between the carrier or entity and an eye care provider without communication with the eye care provider. The bill requires the commissioner of insurance to institute a corrective action plan or use any of the commissioner's enforcement powers against a carrier or entity that is not in compliance with the above requirements. (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.) , Read More
- Who sponsors HB 18-1012?
- HB 18-1012 is sponsored by Jon Becker, Susan Lontine, Kevin Lundberg, and Irene Aguilar.
- What is the current status of HB 18-1012?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 18-1012?
- Track HB 18-1012 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 18-1012
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 18-1012
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →