Colorado 2017 Regular Session Status: Enacted

HB 17-1016 — Exclude Value Mineral Resources Tax Increment Financing Division

Last action — Governor Signed

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2017. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 76% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

The bill permits the governing body of a municipality, as applicable, to provide in an urban renewal plan that the valuation attributable to the extraction of mineral resources located within the urban renewal area is not subject to the division of taxes between base and incremental revenues that accompanies the tax increment financing of urban renewal projects. In such circumstances, the taxes levied on the valuation will be distributed to the public bodies as if the urban renewal plan was not in effect. The bill defines the terms 'mineral resources' and 'valuation attributable to the extraction of mineral resources.' (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

16 added · 22 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to Bill HB 17-1016 clarify definitions related to the governance of municipalities, specifically addressing how local governments can manage taxes associated with mineral resources. The term "mineral resources" now aligns with an existing definition in another statute, ensuring consistency. This standardization matters because it provides clearer guidelines for municipalities, helping them navigate tax levies more effectively and avoid confusion in the implementation of these laws.

→
Previous
Latest
First Regular Session Seventy-first General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
First Regular Session Seventy-first General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO ENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
17-0205.01 Bob Lackner x4350 HOUSE BILL 17-1016 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Saine and Gray, SENATE SPONSORSHIP Martinez Humenik and Zenzinger, House Committees Senate Committees Local Government Finance A BILL FOR AN ACT C ONCERNING THE ABILITY OF AN URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY TO EXCLUDETHEVALUATIONATTRIBUTABLETOTHEEXTRACTION OFMINERALRESOURCESLOCATEDWITHINANURBANRENEWAL AREA FROM THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF TAXABLE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO DIVISION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING URBAN e RENEWAL PROJECTS .
17-0205.01 Bob Lackner x4350 HOUSE BILL 17-1016 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Saine and Gray, SENATE SPONSORSHIP Martinez Humenik and Zenzinger, House Committees Senate Committees Local Government Finance A BILL FOR AN ACT CONCERNING THE ABILITY OF AN URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY TO EXCLUDETHEVALUATIONATTRIBUTABLETOTHEEXTRACTION OFMINERALRESOURCESLOCATEDWITHINANURBANRENEWAL AREA FROM THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF TAXABLE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO DIVISION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS .
n 7 m 0 E n , Bill Summary U U y O i a H a b (Note:
Bill Summary (Note:
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does R e notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill r F passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at http://leg.colorado.gov.) i 17 a 2 The bill permits the governing body of a municipality, as E e ,6 U d r O 2 u Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at http://leg.colorado.gov.) g i 1 a 2 The bill permits the governing body of a municipality, as S R 6 O n a Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
H d b Capital letters indicate new material to be added to existing statute.
H d r Capital letters indicate new material to be added to existing statute.
d F Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.
d e Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.
e A applicable, to provide in an urban renewal plan that the valuation attributabletotheextractionofmineralresourceslocatedwithintheurban renewal area is not subject to the division of taxes between base and incremental revenues that accompanies the tax increment financing of urban renewal projects.
e F m A applicable, to provide in an urban renewal plan that the valuation attributabletotheextractionofmineralresourceslocatedwithintheurban renewal area is not subject to the division of taxes between base and incremental revenues that accompanies the tax increment financing of urban renewal projects.
View plain text versions (8)

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Signed by the President of the Senate

  3. Sent to the Governor

  4. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  5. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  6. Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments

  7. Senate Committee on Local Government Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole

  8. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Local Government

  9. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  10. House Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee

  11. House Committee on Finance Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole

  12. House Committee on Local Government Refer Amended to Finance

  13. Introduced In House - Assigned to Local Government + Finance

Sponsors

  • Matt Gray · Primary
  • Rachel Zenzinger · Primary
  • Lori Saine · Primary
  • Martinez Humenik · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 98 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (98)

98 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 98 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 3000
Republican 2000
Unaffiliated 6002
Total 11002
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Gray — Yea
Lebsock — Yea
McKean — Yea
Navarro — Not Voting
Ransom — Yea
Rosenthal — Yea
Singer — Not Voting
Thurlow — Yea
Alex Valdez Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
Larry Liston Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Yea
Passed 12 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12000
Republican 0100
Total 12100
% of votes cast 92%8%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Beckman — Yea
Covarrubias — Yea
Foote — Yea
Gray — Yea
Herod — Yea
Lawrence — Yea
Pabon — Yea
Thurlow — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Michaelson Jenet — Yea
Van Winkle — Yea
deGruy Kennedy — Yea
Marc Catlin Republican Nay
Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 3000
Republican 2000
Unaffiliated 6002
Total 11002
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Gray — Yea
Lebsock — Yea
McKean — Yea
Navarro — Not Voting
Ransom — Yea
Rosenthal — Yea
Singer — Not Voting
Thurlow — Yea
Alex Valdez Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
Larry Liston Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Yea

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 17-1016 do?
The bill permits the governing body of a municipality, as applicable, to provide in an urban renewal plan that the valuation attributable to the extraction of mineral resources located within the urban renewal area is not subject to the division of taxes between base and incremental revenues that accompanies the tax increment financing of urban renewal projects. In such circumstances, the taxes levied on the valuation will be distributed to the public bodies as if the urban renewal plan was not in effect. The bill defines the terms 'mineral resources' and 'valuation attributable to the extraction of mineral resources.' (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Who sponsors HB 17-1016?
HB 17-1016 is sponsored by Matt Gray, Rachel Zenzinger, Lori Saine, and Martinez Humenik.
What is the current status of HB 17-1016?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2017. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 17-1016?
Track HB 17-1016 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 17-1016

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 17-1016

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →