Compulsory Review Of Rules By Each Principal Department
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 17-002 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 17-002.
You're tracking SB 17-002
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 17-002 — Compulsory Review Of Rules By Each Principal Department
Last action — House Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Postpone Indefinitely
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Current law requires each principal department to review all of its rules, in accordance with a schedule established by the department of regulatory agencies (DORA), to assess, among other things, the continuing need and cost-effectiveness of each rule. The bill repeals the DORA schedule-setting and instead requires each department to complete or have completed, by November 1, 2018, an initial comprehensive internal rule review. Commencing in 2021, the bill imposes a triennial schedule for such reviews to be conducted. The bill further specifies that the public and certain state agencies must be accorded no fewer than 14 business days to provide input regarding an agency's rules during its review, and that any input received must be attached to the report setting forth the results of the rule reviews included in each agency's departmental regulatory agenda. Additionally, the bill encourages each principal department to undertake an annual review of rules to ensure that the rules conform to any federal or state laws enacted, or any federal or state rules promulgated, within the previous year. (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
16 added · 21 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of the bill, specific amendments were made to improve how regulatory agencies review their rules. The new language encourages departments to analyze their regulations more frequently, even in years when mandatory reviews aren't scheduled, ensuring that they align with any recent changes in federal or state laws. This change aims to keep regulations up-to-date and relevant, which ultimately benefits the public by allowing for more effective governance.
First Regular Session Seventy-first General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REENGROSSEDENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
Bill Summary e (Note:
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does n notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill m 1 T n 2 passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that A U 2 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at E i i S a p http://leg.colorado.gov.) R A r Currentlawrequireseachprincipaldepartmenttoreviewallof its 3 rules, in accordance with a schedule established by the department of regulatory agencies (DORA), to assess, among other things, the g i continuing need and cost-effectiveness of each rule.
The bill repeals the ad 7e 1 DORA schedule-setting and instead requires a review and supplemental ET R 02 A n , N 2 1 Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
SE ed ri Capital letters indicate new material to be added to existing statute.
nS Apd p Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.
e A A update to be completed every 3 years, commencing in 2017.
View plain text versions (5)
- Engrossed Engrossed (04/11/2017) pdf
- Engrossed Reengrossed (04/12/2017) Current pdf
- PA1 (02/15/2017) View text pdf
- PA2 (04/06/2017) View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced (01/11/2017) pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
House Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Postpone Indefinitely
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to State, Veterans, & Military Affairs
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
Senate Second Reading Laid Over Daily with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Refer Amended to Appropriations
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology
Sponsors
- Polly Lawrence · Primary
- Martinez Humenik · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 100 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Polly Lawrence
- Martinez Humenik
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (100)
100 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 100 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Foote | — | Nay |
| Hooton | — | Nay |
| Humphrey | — | Yea |
| Leonard | — | Yea |
| Lontine | — | Nay |
| Melton | — | Nay |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Nay |
| Williams D. | — | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kerr | — | Yea |
| Williams A. | — | Yea |
| Neville T. | — | Yea |
| Jahn | — | Yea |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Yea |
| Tate | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gardner | — | Yea |
| Kerr | — | Nay |
| Lambert | — | Yea |
| Lundberg | — | Yea |
| Moreno | — | Nay |
| Sonnenberg | — | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kerr | — | Yea |
| Williams A. | — | Yea |
| Neville T. | — | Yea |
| Jahn | — | Yea |
| Priola | — | Yea |
| Smallwood | — | Yea |
| Tate | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Foote | — | Yea |
| Hooton | — | Yea |
| Humphrey | — | Nay |
| Leonard | — | Nay |
| Lontine | — | Yea |
| Melton | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Williams D. | — | Nay |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gardner | — | Yea |
| Kerr | — | Yea |
| Lambert | — | Yea |
| Lundberg | — | Yea |
| Moreno | — | Not Voting |
| Sonnenberg | — | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 17-002 do?
- Current law requires each principal department to review all of its rules, in accordance with a schedule established by the department of regulatory agencies (DORA), to assess, among other things, the continuing need and cost-effectiveness of each rule. The bill repeals the DORA schedule-setting and instead requires each department to complete or have completed, by November 1, 2018, an initial comprehensive internal rule review. Commencing in 2021, the bill imposes a triennial schedule for such reviews to be conducted. The bill further specifies that the public and certain state agencies must be accorded no fewer than 14 business days to provide input regarding an agency's rules during its review, and that any input received must be attached to the report setting forth the results of the rule reviews included in each agency's departmental regulatory agenda. Additionally, the bill encourages each principal department to undertake an annual review of rules to ensure that the rules conform to any federal or state laws enacted, or any federal or state rules promulgated, within the previous year. (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
- Who sponsors SB 17-002?
- SB 17-002 is sponsored by Polly Lawrence and Martinez Humenik.
- What is the current status of SB 17-002?
- This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 17-002?
- Track SB 17-002 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 17-002
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 17-002
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →