ABANDONED UTILITY TRANSITION COST RECOVERY
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 109 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 109.
You're tracking SB 109
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 109 — ABANDONED UTILITY TRANSITION COST RECOVERY
Last action — action postponed indefinitely
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 23, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
3 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
- Introduced introduced version Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill disqualifies utilities that abandon certain generating facilities from recovering energy transition costs if they invest in new natural gas resources.
-
Section 62-18-4 NMSA 1978
if the qualifying utility is investing in, constructing, acquiring or operating new natural gas resources.→ if the qualifying utility constructs new natural gas resources.Limits the conditions under which a qualifying utility can recover energy transition costs.
Action History
-
action postponed indefinitely
-
Sent to Senate Committees' Committee & Senate Conservation Committee & Senate Tax, Business and Transportation Committee
Sponsors
- Micaelita Debbie O'Malley · Primary
- Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics · Primary
- Harold Pope · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 109 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Micaelita Debbie O'Malley Democrat
- Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics Democrat
- Harold Pope Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (109)
109 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 109 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 109?
- SB 109 is sponsored by Micaelita Debbie O'Malley (Democrat), Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics (Democrat), and Harold Pope (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 109?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 23, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 109?
- Track SB 109 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 109
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 109
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →