New Mexico 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

HM 2 — STUDY SCREEN USE IN ELEMENTARY CLASSROOMS

Last action — Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 05, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (Democratic) on March 09, 2026.

Prognosis

Advancing 52% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

80 added · 140 removed

Plain-language change summary

The bill was updated to request a study on the impact of screen time in elementary classrooms and to ask the Public Education Department to create guidelines for its use. This change is important because it addresses growing concerns about the negative effects of too much screen time on young children's development, such as stress and reduced social skills. By establishing guidelines, the bill aims to ensure that screen time in education is both appropriate and beneficial for students' overall learning experiences.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE MEMORIAL 2 57 TH LEGISLATURE- STATE OF NEW MEXICO - SECOND SESSION, 2026 INTRODUCED BY Joy Garratt 6 8 10 A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE LEGISLATIVE EDUCATION STUDY COMMITTEE TO CONDUCT A STUDY OF THE USE OF SCREEN TIME FOR INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOMS AND REQUESTING THE PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT TO ESTABLISH GUIDELINES FOR SCREEN USE IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOMS.
A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE LEGISLATIVE EDUCATION STUDY COMMITTEE TO CONDUCT A STUDY OF THE USE OF SCREEN TIME FOR INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOMS AND REQUESTING THE PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT TO ESTABLISH GUIDELINES FOR SCREEN USE IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOMS.
e t 17 WHEREAS, research shows that excessive screen time for w l n d 18 young children is associated with higher levels of stress, = = 19 a l sleep disruption, decreased attention span and negative impacts i a e r 20 on social-emotional development;
8 WHEREAS, research shows that excessive screen time for young children is associated with higher levels of stress, sleep disruption, decreased attention span and negative impacts on social-emotional development;
and a t m m 21 WHEREAS, professional organizations such as the American d r e 22 academy of pediatrics recommend limited and developmentally c e s k 23 appropriate use of digital devices for young children;
and WHEREAS, professional organizations such as the American academy of pediatrics recommend limited and developmentally appropriate use of digital devices for young children;
and e a n b 24 u [ WHEREAS, in many public schools, especially those facing staffing shortages, screens are increasingly used for tasks .232810.1 that once involved hands-on learning, exploratory play and direct interaction with educators and peers;
and WHEREAS, in many public schools, especially those facing staffing shortages, screens are increasingly used for tasks that once involved hands-on learning, exploratory play and direct interaction with educators and peers;
and WHEREAS, families and educators have raised concerns about the amount of time elementary students spend on tablets, laptops and online programs for tasks that could be achieved through more developmentally appropriate, hands-on methods;
and WHEREAS, families and educators have raised concerns about the amount of time elementary students spend on HM 2 Page 1 tablets, laptops and online programs for tasks that could be achieved through more developmentally appropriate, hands-on methods;
and WHEREAS, limiting unnecessary screen time aligns with the e t 17 goals of many school districts to improve student well-being, w l n d 18 increase engagement and support healthier classroom = = 19 a l communities;
and WHEREAS, limiting unnecessary screen time aligns with the goals of many school districts to improve student well-being, increase engagement and support healthier classroom communities;
and i a e r 20 WHEREAS, elementary students are assessed using computer- a t m m 21 based testing several times per year, and mandated computerized d r e 22 tutoring sessions associated with the assessments are also c e s k 23 required, which adds to students' screen time;
and WHEREAS, elementary students are assessed using computer-based testing several times per year, and mandated computerized tutoring sessions associated with the assessments are also required, which adds to students' screen time;
and e a n b 24 WHEREAS, as required by the court decision in the u [ Martinez/Yazzie lawsuit, the state must determine whether .232810.1 - 2 - required computer-based tests are culturally and linguistically responsive and appropriate procedures given the specific cultural and linguistic characteristics of the children being assessed;
and WHEREAS, as required by the court decision in the Martinez/Yazzie lawsuit, the state must determine whether required computer-based tests are culturally and linguistically responsive and appropriate procedures given the specific cultural and linguistic characteristics of the children being assessed;
and WHEREAS, as required by the court decision in the Martinez/Yazzie lawsuit, the state must delineate the specific accessibility features of computer-based testing to determine what specific accommodations may still be needed by students with disabilities as well as to determine whether a computer- based test may create new accessibility issues;
and WHEREAS, as required by the court decision in the Martinez/Yazzie lawsuit, the state must delineate the specific accessibility features of computer-based testing to HM 2 Page 2 determine what specific accommodations may still be needed by students with disabilities as well as to determine whether a computer-based test may create new accessibility issues;
e t 17 and w l n d 18 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the public education = = 19 a l department be requested to collaborate with families, educators i a e r 20 and administrators to establish developmentally appropriate a t m m 21 guidelines for daily screen use in elementary classrooms;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the public education department be requested to collaborate with families, educators and administrators to establish developmentally appropriate guidelines for daily screen use in elementary classrooms;
and d r e 22 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the public education c e s k 23 department be requested to ensure that any required technology e a n b 24 use in elementary school classrooms is purposeful, evidence- u [ based, equitable and supportive of healthy child development;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the public education department be requested to ensure that any required technology use in elementary school classrooms is purposeful, evidence-based, equitable and supportive of healthy child development;
.232810.1 - 3 - and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be transmitted to the legislative education study committee and the public education department for appropriate distribution.
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be transmitted to the legislative education study committee and the public education department for appropriate distribution.
- 4 - 7 9 11 13 15 e t 17 w l n d 18 = = 19 a l i a e r 20 a t m m 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .232810.1
HM 2 Page 3 25
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed House

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. Sent to House Education Committee

  5. Sent to House Pre-file

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (111)

111 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 111 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HM 2?
HM 2 is sponsored by Joy Garratt (Democrat).
What is the current status of HM 2?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 05, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track HM 2?
Track HM 2 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HM 2

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HM 2

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →