HB 95 — ADDITIONAL SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT JUDGESHIP
Last action — Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 16, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (Democratic) on March 05, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
28 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill HB 95 now includes provisions for adding one more judgeship in both the First Judicial District and the Second Judicial District. Specifically, the First Judicial District will have a total of eleven judges, while the Second Judicial District will have thirty-one judges. This change is important because it aims to address the growing caseloads in these districts, which can help ensure that cases are handled more efficiently and fairly.
57THAN LEGISLATUREACT -STATEOFNEWMEXICO-RELATING SECONDTO SESSION,COURTS; 2026
CREATING AN ADDITIONAL JUDGESHIP IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT;
CREATING AN ADDITIONAL JUDGESHIP IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT.
5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
SECTION 1.
Section 34-6-4 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1968, Chapter 69, Section 7, as amended) is amended to read:
"34-6-4.
JUDGES--FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT.--There shall be eleven district judges in the first judicial district." SECTION 2.
Section 34-6-5 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1968, Chapter 69, Section 8, as amended) is amended to read:
"34-6-5.
JUDGES--SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT.--There shall be thirty-one district judges in the second judicial district." HB 95/a Page 1 25
View plain text versions (3)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Amended Amendments in Context pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
House concurred in Senate amendments
-
passed Senate
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
DO PASS, as amended, committee report adopted
-
Sent to Senate Judiciary Committee & Senate Finance Committee
-
passed House
-
floor substitute adopted (1 amendment)
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Government, Elections and Indian Affairs Committee & House Judiciary Committee
-
Sent to House Pre-file
Sponsors
- Dayan Hochman-Vigil · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Dayan Hochman-Vigil Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 95?
- HB 95 is sponsored by Dayan Hochman-Vigil (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 95?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 16, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 95?
- Track HB 95 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 95
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 95
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →