New Mexico 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 1 R · 1 D cosponsors

HM 66 — STUDY SANTA TERESA BORDER CROSSING FEE

Last action — Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (Democratic) on March 09, 2026.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (1 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

108 added · 140 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill HM 66 includes a request for the Department of Transportation to study the feasibility of implementing a border crossing fee specifically at the Santa Teresa Port of Entry. This means that lawmakers are exploring whether charging a fee for crossing the border could help address the funding needed for infrastructure maintenance, especially given the high levels of freight traffic at this location. This change is significant as it may lead to financial resources for improving roads and safety in the region, enhancing both public safety and economic development.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE MEMORIAL 66 57 TH LEGISLATURE- STATE OF NEW MEXICO - SECOND SESSION, 2026 INTRODUCED BY Raymundo Lara and Jenifer Jones 6 8 10 A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO STUDY THE FEASIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTING A BORDER CROSSING FEE AT THE SANTA TERESA PORT OF ENTRY;
A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO STUDY THE FEASIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTING A BORDER CROSSING FEE AT THE SANTA TERESA PORT OF ENTRY;
15 WHEREAS, the department of transportation is responsible for the planning, development and maintenance of transportation e t 17 infrastructure that supports public safety, economic w l n d 18 development and regional mobility;
6 WHEREAS, the department of transportation is responsible for the planning, development and maintenance of transportation infrastructure that supports public safety, economic development and regional mobility;
and = = 19 a l WHEREAS, the Santa Teresa port of entry is one of the i a e r 20 fastest-growing international commercial crossings in the a t m m 21 United States and serves as a major economic gateway connecting d r e 22 southern New Mexico to the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, and the c e s k 23 broader North American supply chain;
and WHEREAS, the Santa Teresa port of entry is one of the fastest-growing international commercial crossings in the United States and serves as a major economic gateway connecting southern New Mexico to the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, and the broader North American supply chain;
and e a n b 24 u [ WHEREAS, the Santa Teresa port of entry supports international trade, warehousing, logistics, manufacturing, .234190.1 agriculture and rail activity, generating significant economic activity and heavy commercial traffic in Dona Ana county and the surrounding region;
and WHEREAS, the Santa Teresa port of entry supports international trade, warehousing, logistics, manufacturing, agriculture and rail activity, generating significant economic activity and heavy commercial traffic in Dona Ana county and the surrounding region;
and WHEREAS, continued growth of international trade through the Santa Teresa port of entry will require long-term sustainable funding sources to maintain and expand transportation infrastructure necessary to protect public safety and economic competitiveness;
and WHEREAS, continued growth of international trade through HM 66 Page 1 the Santa Teresa port of entry will require long-term sustainable funding sources to maintain and expand transportation infrastructure necessary to protect public safety and economic competitiveness;
and 14 WHEREAS, many transportation systems throughout the United States and internationally employ user-based funding mechanisms to offset infrastructure costs directly associated with high- e t 17 volume freight corridors and border crossings;
and WHEREAS, many transportation systems throughout the United States and internationally employ user-based funding mechanisms to offset infrastructure costs directly associated with high-volume freight corridors and border crossings;
and w l n d 18 WHEREAS, a carefully structured border crossing user fee = = 19 could provide a dedicated funding stream for infrastructure a l i a e r 20 improvements, congestion reduction, safety enhancements and a t m m 21 trade facilitation projects benefiting residents, businesses d r e 22 and commercial carriers;
and WHEREAS, a carefully structured border crossing user fee could provide a dedicated funding stream for infrastructure improvements, congestion reduction, safety enhancements and trade facilitation projects benefiting residents, businesses and commercial carriers;
and c e s k 23 WHEREAS, before consideration of any policy, the state e a n b 24 should evaluate legal authority, interstate commerce u [ considerations, international treaty implications, operational .234190.1 - 2 - logistics, economic competitiveness impacts and administrative feasibility;
and WHEREAS, before consideration of any policy, the state should evaluate legal authority, interstate commerce considerations, international treaty implications, operational logistics, economic competitiveness impacts and administrative feasibility;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the department of transportation's border crossing fee study evaluate:
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the department of HM 66 Page 2 transportation's border crossing fee study evaluate:
the coordination with federal agencies, including United States customs and border protection, required 14 to impose a border crossing fee;
the coordination with federal agencies, including United States customs and border protection, required to impose a border crossing fee;
the impacts of a border crossing fee on New Mexico's trade competitiveness relative to other states with e t 17 border crossings with Mexico;
the impacts of a border crossing fee on New Mexico's trade competitiveness relative to other states with border crossings with Mexico;
w l n d 18 D.
D.
potential border crossing fee structure options = = 19 for commercial and noncommercial traffic and the estimated a l i a e r 20 annual revenue generation and administrative costs of such fee a t m m 21 structures;
potential border crossing fee structure options for commercial and noncommercial traffic and the estimated annual revenue generation and administrative costs of such fee structures;
d r e 22 E.
E.
the economic impacts a border crossing fee would c e s k 23 have on industry and the workforce in the Santa Teresa region;
the economic impacts a border crossing fee would have on industry and the workforce in the Santa Teresa region;
e a n b 24 F.
F.
the transportation infrastructure needs u [ attributable to traffic from the Santa Teresa port of entry .234190.1 - 3 - anticipated over the next twenty years;
the transportation infrastructure needs attributable to traffic from the Santa Teresa port of entry anticipated over the next twenty years;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in conducting the study, the department of transportation be requested to consult with local governments, metropolitan planning organizations, economic development organizations, industry stakeholders, federal agencies and New Mexico's congressional delegation;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in conducting the study, the department of transportation be requested to consult with HM 66 Page 3 local governments, metropolitan planning organizations, economic development organizations, industry stakeholders, federal agencies and New Mexico's congressional delegation;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be 14 transmitted to the secretary of transportation, the governor, the border authority and local governments within Dona Ana county.
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be transmitted to the secretary of transportation, the governor, the border authority and local governments within Dona Ana county.
e t 17 - 4 - w l n d 18 = = 19 a l i a e r 20 a t m m 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .234190.1
HM 66 Page 4 25
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed House

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. Sent to House Transportation, Public Works & Capital Improvements Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (110)

110 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 110 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HM 66?
HM 66 is sponsored by Jenifer Jones (Republican) and Raymundo Lara (Democrat).
What is the current status of HM 66?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track HM 66?
Track HM 66 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HM 66

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HM 66

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →