HJM 2 — IPRA IMPLEMENTATION STUDY TASK FORCE
Last action — Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 15, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (Democratic) on March 09, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
3 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (2 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
80 added · 108 removedPlain-language change summary
In the updated version of Bill HJM 2, a specific mention of the "first session of the fifty-eighth legislature" has been added, clarifying the timeline for any proposed changes. The previous version included the same request for convening a task force without detailing the session. This change is important because it emphasizes the urgency for legislative action and helps set clear expectations for when the task force’s recommendations will be considered. Overall, it reinforces the commitment to improving public access to government records.
HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL 2 57 TH LEGISLATURE- STATE OF NEW MEXICO - SECOND SESSION, 2026 4 6 8 10 A JOINT MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO CONVENE A TASK FORCE TO STUDY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INSPECTION OF PUBLIC RECORDS ACT AND FOR THAT TASK FORCE TO GATHER INPUT FROM RELEVANT STAKEHOLDERS TO DETERMINE WHETHER ADMINISTRATIVE SOLUTIONS OR LEGISLATIVE CHANGES ARE NECESSARY OR DESIRABLE AND, IF SO, TO PROPOSE SUCH LEGISLATION FOR CONSIDERATION DURING THE FIRST e t 17 SESSION OF THE FIFTY-EIGHTH LEGISLATURE.
w l n d 18 = = 19 a l WHEREAS, the Inspection of Public Records Act provides the i a e r 20 public with access to public records of government entities;
a t m m 21 and d r e 22 WHEREAS, Section 14-2-1 NMSA 1978 declares that the policy c e s k 23 of the state is that "[e]very person has a right to inspect e a n b 24 public records of this state", with some exceptions;
and u [ WHEREAS, providing access to public records promotes .233640.3 HJC/HJM 2 transparency in the operations of government and the conduct of public officials and employees and enables members of the public to hold government actors accountable;
HJC/HJM 2 Page 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the attorney general be requested to convene a task force to study the implementation of the Inspection of Public Records Act;
and, if necessary or desirable, propose administrative solutions or legislation based on the task e t 17 force's findings and recommendations for consideration during w l n d 18 the first session of the fifty-eighth legislature;
and = = 19 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the task force consist of one a l i a e r 20 representative from each of the following:
the department of a t m m 21 justice, the New Mexico municipal league, the New Mexico d r e 22 association of counties, the New Mexico foundation for open c e s k 23 government, the American civil liberties union of New Mexico, e a n b 24 the New Mexico press association, a defense attorney u [ specializing in the Inspection of Public Records Act and a .233640.3 - 2 - HJC/HJM 2 plaintiff's attorney specializing in the Inspection of Public Records Act;
the judicial HJC/HJM 2 Page 2 branch of government, including district attorneys and public defenders and their records custodians;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this memorial be e t 17 transmitted to the attorney general.
wHJC/HJM l2 nPage d 18 - 3 -25 = = 19 a l i a e r 20 a t m m 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .233640.3
View plain text versions (3)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Substitute JC substitute pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
passed Senate
-
withdrawn from committee
-
Sent to Senate Rules Committee
-
passed House
-
DO NOT PASS, replaced with committee substitute
-
Sent to House Judiciary Committee
-
Sent to House Pre-file
Sponsors
- Matthew McQueen · Primary
- Natalie Figueroa · Primary
- Cathrynn N. Brown · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 109 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Matthew McQueen Democrat
- Natalie Figueroa Democrat
- Cathrynn N. Brown Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (109)
109 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 109 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HJM 2?
- HJM 2 is sponsored by Matthew McQueen (Democrat), Natalie Figueroa (Democrat), and Cathrynn N. Brown (Republican).
- What is the current status of HJM 2?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 15, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HJM 2?
- Track HJM 2 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HJM 2
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HJM 2
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →