SB 35 — CREATE ADDITION 1ST DISTRICT JUDGESHIP
Last action — action postponed indefinitely
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 21, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
11 added · 30 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill SB 35 has been revised to create an additional judgeship in the Second Judicial District instead of the First Judicial District, increasing the number of district judges in the Second District from thirty to thirty-one. Additionally, the emergency clause has been added, allowing the bill to take effect immediately for the public's health and safety. This change matters because it aims to address court needs in the Second District more promptly, potentially improving judicial efficiency and access to justice for the community.
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL 35 57TH LEGISLATURE -STATEOFNEWMEXICO- SECOND SESSION , 2026 INTRODUCED4 BY6 Linda8 M.10 AN ACT RELATING TO COURTS;
TrujilloCREATING andADDITIONAL PeterJUDGESHIPS WirthIN 6THE 8FIRST 10AND ANSECOND ACTJUDICIAL RELATINGDISTRICTS; TO COURTS;
CREATINGDECLARING AN ADDITIONALEMERGENCY. JUDGESHIP IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT;
MAKING AN APPROPRIATION.
APPROPRIATION.--FourSection hundred34-6-5 fifty-oneNMSA 1978 (being Laws 1968, i a e r 20 thousandChapter four69, hundredSection dollars8, ($451,400)as amended) is appropriatedamended from a t m m 21 the general fund to theread: administrative office of the courts for d r e 22 expenditure in fiscal year 2027 to pay the costs associated c e s k 23 with a new judgeship in the first judicial district, including e a n b 24 salaries and benefits for the judge and staff, furniture, u [ equipment and supplies.
Anya unexpendedt balancem remainingm at21 .233036.1SA"34-6-5. the end of fiscal year 2027 shall revert to the general fund.
-JUDGES--SECOND 2JUDICIAL -DISTRICT.--There 4shall 6 8 10 12 14 16 e t 17 w l n d 18r = = 19 a l i a e r22 20be a[thirty] tthirty-one mdistrict mjudges 21in dthe rsecond ejudicial 22 c e s k 23 district." e a n b 24 uSECTION [3. .233036.1SA
EMERGENCY.--It is necessary for the public u [ peace, health and safety that this act take effect immediately.
.233786.2
View plain text versions (2)
- Substitute FC substitute Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
action postponed indefinitely
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Judiciary Committee
-
passed Senate
-
DO NOT PASS, replaced with committee substitute
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
germane
-
Sent to Senate Committees' Committee & Senate Judiciary Committee & Senate Finance Committee
Sponsors
- Peter Wirth · Primary
- Linda M. Trujillo · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Peter Wirth Democrat
- Linda M. Trujillo Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (110)
110 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 110 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| SEDILLO-LOPEZ | — | Yea |
| Angel M. Charley | Democrat | Yea |
| Antonio Maestas | Democrat | Yea |
| Benny Shendo, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Carrie Hamblen | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Nava | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics | Democrat | Yea |
| George K. Muñoz | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Harold Pope | Democrat | Yea |
| Heather Berghmans | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Steinborn | Democrat | Yea |
| Joseph Cervantes | Democrat | Yea |
| Katy Duhigg | Democrat | Yea |
| Leo Jaramillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. López | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Martin Hickey | Democrat | Yea |
| Micaelita Debbie O'Malley | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Padilla | Democrat | Yea |
| Mimi Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Natalie Figueroa | Democrat | Yea |
| Pete Campos | Democrat | Yea |
| Peter Wirth | Democrat | Yea |
| Roberto "Bobby" J. Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Shannon D. Pinto | Democrat | Yea |
| William P. Soules | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony L. Thornton | Republican | Yea |
| Candy Spence Ezzell | Republican | Yea |
| Craig W. Brandt | Republican | Yea |
| Crystal Brantley | Republican | Yea |
| David M. Gallegos | Republican | Yea |
| Gabriel Ramos | Republican | Yea |
| James G. Townsend | Republican | Yea |
| Jay C. Block | Republican | Not Voting |
| Joshua A. Sanchez | Republican | Not Voting |
| Larry R. Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Nicole Tobiassen | Republican | Not Voting |
| Pat Boone | Republican | Yea |
| Pat Woods | Republican | Yea |
| Rex Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Steve D. Lanier | Republican | Yea |
| William E. Sharer | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 35?
- SB 35 is sponsored by Peter Wirth (Democrat) and Linda M. Trujillo (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 35?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 21, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 35?
- Track SB 35 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 35
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 35
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →