New Mexico 2026 Regular Session Status: Passed House Bipartisan · 3 R · 2 D cosponsors

HB 132 — POLICE OFFICER WORKERS COMP CONDITIONS

Last action — action postponed indefinitely

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the House. Introduced January 22, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 52% · moderate confidence
  • Passed House

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 5 sponsors

    5 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (3 R · 2 D) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 107 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revisions to Bill HB 132 removed an introductory header with details about the legislative session and the representatives who introduced the bill. The important content of the bill, which establishes a list of health conditions presumed to be caused by employment as a police officer, remains intact. This change matters as it streamlines the document, making it easier to focus on the bill's key proposal, which aims to support police officers facing occupational health issues.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE BILL 132 57TH LEGISLATURE- STATE OF NEW MEXICO - SECOND SESSION, 2026 INTRODUCED BY Cynthia Borrego and Marian Matthews and Nicole Chavez and Andrea Reeb and Luis M.
57TH LEGISLATURE -STATEOFNEWMEXICO- SECOND SESSION, 2026
Terrazas 7 9 AN ACT RELATING TO WORKERS' COMPENSATION;
PROVIDING FOR A LIST OF CONDITIONS PRESUMED TO BE PROXIMATELY CAUSED BY EMPLOYMENT AS A POLICE OFFICER.
15 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
SECTION 1.
A new Section 52-3-32.2 NMSA 1978 is enacted e t 17 to read:
w l n d 18 "52-3-32.2.
[NEW MATERIAL] POLICE OFFICER OCCUPATIONAL = = 19 a l CONDITIONS.-- i a e r 20 A.
As used in this section:
a t m m 21 (1) "duty belt" means a belt used for the d r e 22 purpose of holding a gun, handcuffs, a baton and other items c e s k 23 related to law enforcement;
and e a n b 24 (2) "police officer" means a commissioned u [ employee of a law enforcement agency that is part of or .233218.1 administered by the state or a political subdivision of the state who is responsible for the prevention and detection of crime or the enforcement of the penal, traffic or highway laws of this state and includes:
(a) an employee of a missile range civilian police department who is a graduate of a recognized certified regional law enforcement training facility and who is currently certifiable by the New Mexico law enforcement academy;
and (b) a sheriff and a deputy sheriff.
B.
If a police officer is diagnosed with one or more of the following conditions after the period of employment indicated and the condition was not revealed during an initial employment medical screening examination or during a subsequent medical review pursuant to the Occupational Health and Safety Act and rules promulgated pursuant to that act, the condition e t 17 is presumed to be proximately caused by employment as a police w l n d 18 officer:
= = 19 a l (1) posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosed by i a e r 20 a physician or psychologist that results in physical a t m m 21 impairment, primary or secondary mental impairment or death d r e 22 after twenty years if hired on or before June 30, 2013 and c e s k 23 twenty-five years if hired on or after July 1, 2013;
e a n b 24 (2) back pain due to wearing a duty belt as a u [ condition of employment after twenty years if hired on or .233218.1 - 2 - before June 30, 2013 and twenty-five years if hired on or after July 1, 2013;
and (3) heart issues after twenty years if hired on or before June 30, 2013 and twenty-five years if hired on or after July 1, 2013.
C.
The presumptions created in this section may be rebutted by a preponderance of evidence in a court of competent jurisdiction showing that the police officer engaged in conduct or activities outside of employment that posed a significant risk of contracting or developing a described condition.
D.
Medical treatment based on the presumptions created in this section shall be provided by an employer as for a job-related condition or injury unless and until a court of competent jurisdiction determines that the presumption does not apply.
If the court determines that the presumption does not apply or that the condition or injury is not job related, the e t 17 employer's workers' compensation insurance provider shall be w l n d 18 reimbursed for health care costs by the medical or health = = 19 a l insurance plan or benefit provided for the police officer by i a e r 20 the employer." a t m m 21 - 3 - d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .233218.1
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. action postponed indefinitely

  2. Sent to Senate Judiciary Committee

  3. passed House

  4. DO PASS committee report adopted

  5. DO PASS, as amended, committee report adopted

  6. Sent to House Labor, Veterans & Military Affairs Committee & House Health & Human Services Committee

  7. withdrawn printed germane prefile

  8. not printed House Rules and Order of Business Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

5 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 107 not signed on

Sponsors (5)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (107)

107 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 107 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 132?
HB 132 is sponsored by Luis M. Terrazas (Republican), Andrea Reeb (Republican), Nicole Chavez (Republican), Marian Matthews (Democrat), and Cynthia Borrego (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 132?
This bill has passed the House. Introduced January 22, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track HB 132?
Track HB 132 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 132

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 132

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →