HM 30 — PUBLIC EDUCATION GOVERNANCE STUDY
Last action — Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 02, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (Democratic) on March 09, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (2 R · 2 D) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
138 added · 177 removedPlain-language change summary
In the updated version of House Memorial 30, line numbers have been adjusted and specific language has been clarified, but the overall message remains consistent. The bill continues to call on the Legislative Education Study Committee to examine how public education is governed in New Mexico, emphasizing the need for improved coherence and accountability in the education system. This change matters because it highlights the state’s commitment to addressing educational disparities and ensuring that strategies for improvement are effectively implemented across the state.
HOUSEA MEMORIAL 30REQUESTING 57THE THLEGISLATIVE LEGISLATURE-EDUCATION STATESTUDY OFCOMMITTEE NEWTO MEXICOSTUDY -PUBLIC SECONDEDUCATION SESSION,GOVERNANCE. 2026 INTRODUCED BY Joy Garratt and G.
Andrés5 RomeroWHEREAS, New Mexico's education system is complex and Brianshaped G.by diverse communities, unique strengths and longstanding commitments to educational improvement, and continued refinement of governance structures presents an opportunity to strengthen coherence, continuity and shared statewide vision for student success;
Baca and JackWHEREAS, Chatfieldthe 7Martinez-Yazzie 9v. A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE LEGISLATIVE EDUCATION STUDY COMMITTEE TO STUDY PUBLIC EDUCATION GOVERNANCE.
14State WHEREAS,of New Mexico'sMexico education systemsufficiency isruling complexfound andthe shapedstate byhad diversefailed communities,to uniquemeet strengthsits andconstitutional longstandingobligation commitmentsfor toat-risk educationalstudents improvement, and ecalled tfor 17a continuedcomprehensive refinementstatewide ofplan, governanceclear structuresimplementation, presentsmonitoring an w l n d 18 opportunity to strengthen coherence, continuity and sharedaccountability =structures; = 19 a l statewide vision for student success;
and iWHEREAS, athe elegislative reducation 20study WHEREAS,committee analysis of strategic plans developed by entities across New Mexico shows substantial overlap in goals but limited systemic coherence, resulting in an uneven approach to improvement and unclear roles and responsibilities across the Martinez-Yazzieeducation v.ecosystem;
Stateand ofWHEREAS, Newlong-term Mexicoeducational aplanning tcan mbe mstrengthened 21by educationstructures sufficiencythat rulingsupport foundcontinuity theacross stateadministrations, hadreduce failedthe toimpact meetof dshort-term rpolicy eshifts 22 its constitutional obligation for at-risk students and calledpromote cstable, ecollaborative sapproaches kto 23HM for30 aPage comprehensive1 statewide plan,educational cleargoals; implementation, e a n b 24 u [ monitoring and accountability structures;
and WHEREAS, the legislative education study committee .232909.2 analysis of strategic plans developed by entities across New Mexico shows substantial overlap in goals but limited systemic coherence, resulting in an uneven approach to improvement and unclear roles and responsibilities across the education ecosystem;
and WHEREAS, long-term educational planning can be strengthened by structures that support continuity across administrations, reduce the impact of short-term policy shifts and promote stable, collaborative approaches to statewide educational goals;
and e t 17 WHEREAS, national and international research indicates w l n d 18 that jurisdictions rapidly improving the jurisdictions' = = 19 a l education systems often have governance structures that set a i a e r 20 jurisdiction-wide vision;
a t m m 21 learn systematically from national and global exemplars;
d r e 22 sustain progress across political transitions;
and c e s k 23 intentionally include educators, youth and communities in e a n b 24 decision-making;
and u [ WHEREAS, states such as Maryland, Michigan, Montana, .232909.2 - 2 - Nevada and Pennsylvania have created formal commissions to design statewide visions, align agencies, develop multi-year implementation strategies and embed evaluation through independent oversight bodies, illustrating actionable models for New Mexico as it considers its own structures;
State of New Mexico ruling, diverse student population, rural-urban variation, tribal sovereignty and significant investments in education initiatives, HM 30 Page 2 requires a governance approach that both responds to immediate needs and anticipates future challenges;
and WHEREAS, a formal, legislatively authorized working group e t 17 could evaluate options for such a structure, assess roles and w l n d 18 responsibilities across agencies and levels of governance and = = 19 a l make recommendations that clarify authority, strengthen system i a e r 20 capacity, improve coherence and help ensure that all New Mexico a t m m 21 students receive equitable, high-quality educational d r e 22 opportunities;
c e s k 23 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF e a n b 24 REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the legislative u [ education study committee be requested to study public .232909.2 - 3 - education governance;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the importance of an effective public school governance system be acknowledged and that the legislative education study committee be requested to convene a working group focused on education governance and long-term educational planning during the 2026 interim and make recommendations on the purpose, feasibility, structure, time line and composition of a potential education HM 30 Page 3 commission, including a review of options for establishing a statewide education commission;
e t 17 and w l n d 18 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the legislative education = = 19 a l study committee be requested to work with the legislative i a e r 20 finance committee;
the early a t m m 21 childhood education and care department;
the higher education d r e 22 department;
the children's c e s k 23 cabinet;
community, research and nonprofit organizations with e a n b 24 expertise in education, systems design or long-term planning;
u [ public school educators;
.232909.2 - 4 - and other individuals as requested by the legislative education study committee;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the working group be HM 30 Page 4 authorized to organize subgroups to study distinct aspects of education governance and planning;
eHM t30 17Page - 5 -25 w l n d 18 = = 19 a l i a e r 20 a t m m 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .232909.2
View plain text versions (2)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
passed House
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Education Committee
Sponsors
- Jack Chatfield · Primary
- Brian G. Baca · Primary
- Joy Garratt · Primary
- G. Andrés Romero · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 108 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Jack Chatfield Republican
- Brian G. Baca Republican
- Joy Garratt Democrat
- G. Andrés Romero Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (108)
108 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 108 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HM 30?
- HM 30 is sponsored by Jack Chatfield (Republican), Brian G. Baca (Republican), Joy Garratt (Democrat), and G. Andrés Romero (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HM 30?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 02, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HM 30?
- Track HM 30 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HM 30
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HM 30
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →