New Mexico 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 2 R · 2 D cosponsors

HM 30 — PUBLIC EDUCATION GOVERNANCE STUDY

Last action — Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 02, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (Democratic) on March 09, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (2 R · 2 D) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

138 added · 177 removed

Plain-language change summary

In the updated version of House Memorial 30, line numbers have been adjusted and specific language has been clarified, but the overall message remains consistent. The bill continues to call on the Legislative Education Study Committee to examine how public education is governed in New Mexico, emphasizing the need for improved coherence and accountability in the education system. This change matters because it highlights the state’s commitment to addressing educational disparities and ensuring that strategies for improvement are effectively implemented across the state.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE MEMORIAL 30 57 TH LEGISLATURE- STATE OF NEW MEXICO - SECOND SESSION, 2026 INTRODUCED BY Joy Garratt and G.
A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE LEGISLATIVE EDUCATION STUDY COMMITTEE TO STUDY PUBLIC EDUCATION GOVERNANCE.
Andrés Romero and Brian G.
5 WHEREAS, New Mexico's education system is complex and shaped by diverse communities, unique strengths and longstanding commitments to educational improvement, and continued refinement of governance structures presents an opportunity to strengthen coherence, continuity and shared statewide vision for student success;
Baca and Jack Chatfield 7 9 A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE LEGISLATIVE EDUCATION STUDY COMMITTEE TO STUDY PUBLIC EDUCATION GOVERNANCE.
and WHEREAS, the Martinez-Yazzie v.
14 WHEREAS, New Mexico's education system is complex and shaped by diverse communities, unique strengths and longstanding commitments to educational improvement, and e t 17 continued refinement of governance structures presents an w l n d 18 opportunity to strengthen coherence, continuity and shared = = 19 a l statewide vision for student success;
State of New Mexico education sufficiency ruling found the state had failed to meet its constitutional obligation for at-risk students and called for a comprehensive statewide plan, clear implementation, monitoring and accountability structures;
and i a e r 20 WHEREAS, the Martinez-Yazzie v.
and WHEREAS, the legislative education study committee analysis of strategic plans developed by entities across New Mexico shows substantial overlap in goals but limited systemic coherence, resulting in an uneven approach to improvement and unclear roles and responsibilities across the education ecosystem;
State of New Mexico a t m m 21 education sufficiency ruling found the state had failed to meet d r e 22 its constitutional obligation for at-risk students and called c e s k 23 for a comprehensive statewide plan, clear implementation, e a n b 24 u [ monitoring and accountability structures;
and WHEREAS, long-term educational planning can be strengthened by structures that support continuity across administrations, reduce the impact of short-term policy shifts and promote stable, collaborative approaches to HM 30 Page 1 statewide educational goals;
and WHEREAS, the legislative education study committee .232909.2 analysis of strategic plans developed by entities across New Mexico shows substantial overlap in goals but limited systemic coherence, resulting in an uneven approach to improvement and unclear roles and responsibilities across the education ecosystem;
and WHEREAS, long-term educational planning can be strengthened by structures that support continuity across administrations, reduce the impact of short-term policy shifts and promote stable, collaborative approaches to statewide educational goals;
and e t 17 WHEREAS, national and international research indicates w l n d 18 that jurisdictions rapidly improving the jurisdictions' = = 19 a l education systems often have governance structures that set a i a e r 20 jurisdiction-wide vision;
and WHEREAS, national and international research indicates that jurisdictions rapidly improving the jurisdictions' education systems often have governance structures that set a jurisdiction-wide vision;
a t m m 21 learn systematically from national and global exemplars;
learn systematically from national and global exemplars;
d r e 22 sustain progress across political transitions;
sustain progress across political transitions;
and c e s k 23 intentionally include educators, youth and communities in e a n b 24 decision-making;
and intentionally include educators, youth and communities in decision-making;
and u [ WHEREAS, states such as Maryland, Michigan, Montana, .232909.2 - 2 - Nevada and Pennsylvania have created formal commissions to design statewide visions, align agencies, develop multi-year implementation strategies and embed evaluation through independent oversight bodies, illustrating actionable models for New Mexico as it considers its own structures;
and WHEREAS, states such as Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada and Pennsylvania have created formal commissions to design statewide visions, align agencies, develop multi-year implementation strategies and embed evaluation through independent oversight bodies, illustrating actionable models for New Mexico as it considers its own structures;
State of New Mexico ruling, diverse student population, rural-urban variation, tribal sovereignty and significant investments in education initiatives, requires a governance approach that both responds to immediate needs and anticipates future challenges;
State of New Mexico ruling, diverse student population, rural-urban variation, tribal sovereignty and significant investments in education initiatives, HM 30 Page 2 requires a governance approach that both responds to immediate needs and anticipates future challenges;
and WHEREAS, a formal, legislatively authorized working group e t 17 could evaluate options for such a structure, assess roles and w l n d 18 responsibilities across agencies and levels of governance and = = 19 a l make recommendations that clarify authority, strengthen system i a e r 20 capacity, improve coherence and help ensure that all New Mexico a t m m 21 students receive equitable, high-quality educational d r e 22 opportunities;
and WHEREAS, a formal, legislatively authorized working group could evaluate options for such a structure, assess roles and responsibilities across agencies and levels of governance and make recommendations that clarify authority, strengthen system capacity, improve coherence and help ensure that all New Mexico students receive equitable, high-quality educational opportunities;
c e s k 23 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF e a n b 24 REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the legislative u [ education study committee be requested to study public .232909.2 - 3 - education governance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the legislative education study committee be requested to study public education governance;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the importance of an effective public school governance system be acknowledged and that the legislative education study committee be requested to convene a working group focused on education governance and long-term educational planning during the 2026 interim and make recommendations on the purpose, feasibility, structure, time line and composition of a potential education commission, including a review of options for establishing a statewide education commission;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the importance of an effective public school governance system be acknowledged and that the legislative education study committee be requested to convene a working group focused on education governance and long-term educational planning during the 2026 interim and make recommendations on the purpose, feasibility, structure, time line and composition of a potential education HM 30 Page 3 commission, including a review of options for establishing a statewide education commission;
e t 17 and w l n d 18 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the legislative education = = 19 a l study committee be requested to work with the legislative i a e r 20 finance committee;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the legislative education study committee be requested to work with the legislative finance committee;
the early a t m m 21 childhood education and care department;
the early childhood education and care department;
the higher education d r e 22 department;
the higher education department;
the children's c e s k 23 cabinet;
the children's cabinet;
community, research and nonprofit organizations with e a n b 24 expertise in education, systems design or long-term planning;
community, research and nonprofit organizations with expertise in education, systems design or long-term planning;
u [ public school educators;
public school educators;
.232909.2 - 4 - and other individuals as requested by the legislative education study committee;
and other individuals as requested by the legislative education study committee;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the working group be authorized to organize subgroups to study distinct aspects of education governance and planning;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the working group be HM 30 Page 4 authorized to organize subgroups to study distinct aspects of education governance and planning;
e t 17 - 5 - w l n d 18 = = 19 a l i a e r 20 a t m m 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .232909.2
HM 30 Page 5 25
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed House

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. Sent to House Education Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 108 not signed on

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (108)

108 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 108 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HM 30?
HM 30 is sponsored by Jack Chatfield (Republican), Brian G. Baca (Republican), Joy Garratt (Democrat), and G. Andrés Romero (Democrat).
What is the current status of HM 30?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 02, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track HM 30?
Track HM 30 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HM 30

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HM 30

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →