California 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 D cosponsors

SB 1393 — Energy: appliances: local requirements.

Last action — August 11 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to gather or develop, and publish on its internet website, guidance and best practices to help building owners, the construction industry, and local governments overcome barriers to electrification of buildings and installation of electric vehicle charging equipment that include one or more specified topics. This bill would require the commission to gather or develop, and publish on its internet website, the guidance and best practices by July 1, 2023, and would require the guidance to include all of those specified topics and additional topics. The bill would require the commission to update annually the guidance and best practices. The bill would require a city, including a charter city, or county, when adopting an ordinance requiring the replacement of a fossil fuel-fired appliance with an electric appliance upon the alteration or retrofit of a residential and nonresidential building, to consider any guidance published by the commission. The bill would require the commission, upon request by a local government considering the adoption of that ordinance, to provide technical assistance to the local government. The bill would require a local government, within 60 days of adopting that ordinance, to submit to the commission a copy of the ordinance, and other specified information and would require the commission to provide written comments on the ordinance based upon the commission's guidance published at the time the ordinance is adopted. If the commission determines that the local government did not consider the guidance, the bill would require the local government to consider the guidance or portion of the guidance that the commission determines the local government did not consider, make any modification of the ordinance deemed necessary by the local government, and resubmit the ordinance and other information to the commission. The bill would specify that the commission is to implement the requirements of the bill upon appropriation by the Legislature. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. August 11 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

  2. Joint Rule 62(a) suspended.

  3. August 10 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.

  4. August 3 hearing postponed by committee.

  5. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  6. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 29).

  7. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  8. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.

  9. Referred to Coms. on U. & E. and L. GOV.

  10. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  11. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 3. Page 3982.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  12. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  13. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  14. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3795.) (May 19).

  15. Set for hearing May 19.

  16. May 9 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file.

  17. Set for hearing May 9.

  18. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 3460.) (April 20).

  20. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  21. Set for hearing April 20.

  22. April 21 hearing postponed by committee.

  23. Set for hearing April 21.

  24. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  25. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 8. Noes 2. Page 3238.) (March 28).

  26. Set for hearing March 28.

  27. Referred to Coms. on E., U. & C. and GOV. & F.

  28. From printer.

  29. Article IV Section 8(a) of the Constitution and Joint Rule 55 dispensed with February 7, 2022, suspending the 30 calendar day requirement.

  30. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Bob Archuleta · Primary
  • Rodriguez · Cosponsor
  • Quirk · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Rodriguez
  • Quirk

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 3001
Unaffiliated 8002
Total 11003
% of votes cast 79%0%0%21%
How each member voted (14)
Member Party Vote
Santiago — Yea
Holden — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Ting — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Not Voting
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 21 Yea · 3 Nay · 16 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 121010
Democratic 6205
Republican 3001
Total 213016
% of votes cast 53%8%0%40%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Eggman — Not Voting
Borgeas — Not Voting
Min — Not Voting
Hertzberg — Not Voting
Gonzalez — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Not Voting
Roth — Yea
Pan — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Newman — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Bates — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Bradford — Nay
Melendez — Not Voting
Nielsen — Not Voting
Kamlager — Not Voting
Skinner — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Not Voting
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Not Voting
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Not Voting
Limón, Monique Democratic Not Voting
McGuire, Mike Democratic Not Voting
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Nay
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4100
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Portantino — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Bates — Nay
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5000
Republican 1000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Portantino — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Bates — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 2 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 2000
Unaffiliated 6003
Democratic 0201
Total 8204
% of votes cast 57%14%0%29%
How each member voted (14)
Member Party Vote
Borgeas — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Gonzalez — Not Voting
Eggman — Not Voting
Min — Not Voting
Becker, Josh Democratic Nay
McGuire, Mike Democratic Not Voting
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1393 do?
Existing law requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to gather or develop, and publish on its internet website, guidance and best practices to help building owners, the construction industry, and local governments overcome barriers to electrification of buildings and installation of electric vehicle charging equipment that include one or more specified topics. This bill would require the commission to gather or develop, and publish on its internet website, the guidance and best practices by July 1, 2023, and would require the guidance to include all of those specified topics and additional topics. The bill would require the commission to update annually the guidance and best practices. The bill would require a city, including a charter city, or county, when adopting an ordinance requiring the replacement of a fossil fuel-fired appliance with an electric appliance upon the alteration or retrofit of a residential and nonresidential building, to consider any guidance published by the commission. The bill would require the commission, upon request by a local government considering the adoption of that ordinance, to provide technical assistance to the local government. The bill would require a local government, within 60 days of adopting that ordinance, to submit to the commission a copy of the ordinance, and other specified information and would require the commission to provide written comments on the ordinance based upon the commission's guidance published at the time the ordinance is adopted. If the commission determines that the local government did not consider the guidance, the bill would require the local government to consider the guidance or portion of the guidance that the commission determines the local government did not consider, make any modification of the ordinance deemed necessary by the local government, and resubmit the ordinance and other information to the commission. The bill would specify that the commission is to implement the requirements of the bill upon appropriation by the Legislature. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
Who sponsors SB 1393?
SB 1393 is sponsored by Archuleta, Bob (Democratic), Rodriguez, and Quirk.
What is the current status of SB 1393?
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1393?
Track SB 1393 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1393

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1393

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →