Exempt surplus land: regional housing need.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1748 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1748.
You're tracking AB 1748
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1748 — Exempt surplus land: regional housing need.
Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law prescribes requirements for the disposal of surplus land by a local agency. Existing law defines "surplus land" for these purposed to mean land owned in fee simple by any local agency for which the local agency's governing body takes formal action declaring that the land is surplus and is not necessary for the agency's use. Existing law provides that an agency is not required to follow the requirements for disposal of surplus land for "exempt surplus land," except as provided. Existing law categorizes as "exempt surplus land," surplus land that a local agency is transferring to another local, state, or federal agency for the agency's use. The Planning and Zoning Law requires that the housing element of a city's or county's general plan consist of an identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, financial resources, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing. Existing law requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region, as specified. Existing law requires a planning agency to provide an annual report to the Department of Housing and Community Development that includes, among other things, its progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs. Existing law requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to designate jurisdictions that have enacted prohousing local policies, as defined, as prohousing. Existing law grants prohousing jurisdictions that have been found to have a substantially compliant housing element additional points or preferences in the scoring of programs and applications for specified state housing programs. This bill would add to the definition of "exempt surplus land," surplus land that is zoned for a density of up to 30 residential units, if residential properties within a radius of 500 feet of the site are zoned to have an allowable density of fewer than 30 dwelling units per acre and the most recent annual progress report, as described, submitted by the city or county that owns the surplus land shows that the total number of low-income and very low income housing units built within the city or county meets or exceeds proportionate annual progress toward the number of those housing units needed to meet the city's or county's share of regional housing need for the 6th cycle of its housing element, as described.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/06/22 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 06, 2022
- Introduced 02/01/22 - Introduced pdf February 01, 2022
- AB1748 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and H. & C.D.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 4.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Kelly Seyarto · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Seyarto, Kelly Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 25% | 63% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Nay |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Nay |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Nay |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Nay |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Nay |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 0% | 0% | 25% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Not Voting |
| Luz Rivas | — | Not Voting |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1748 do?
- Existing law prescribes requirements for the disposal of surplus land by a local agency. Existing law defines "surplus land" for these purposed to mean land owned in fee simple by any local agency for which the local agency's governing body takes formal action declaring that the land is surplus and is not necessary for the agency's use. Existing law provides that an agency is not required to follow the requirements for disposal of surplus land for "exempt surplus land," except as provided. Existing law categorizes as "exempt surplus land," surplus land that a local agency is transferring to another local, state, or federal agency for the agency's use. The Planning and Zoning Law requires that the housing element of a city's or county's general plan consist of an identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, financial resources, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing. Existing law requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region, as specified. Existing law requires a planning agency to provide an annual report to the Department of Housing and Community Development that includes, among other things, its progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs. Existing law requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to designate jurisdictions that have enacted prohousing local policies, as defined, as prohousing. Existing law grants prohousing jurisdictions that have been found to have a substantially compliant housing element additional points or preferences in the scoring of programs and applications for specified state housing programs. This bill would add to the definition of "exempt surplus land," surplus land that is zoned for a density of up to 30 residential units, if residential properties within a radius of 500 feet of the site are zoned to have an allowable density of fewer than 30 dwelling units per acre and the most recent annual progress report, as described, submitted by the city or county that owns the surplus land shows that the total number of low-income and very low income housing units built within the city or county meets or exceeds proportionate annual progress toward the number of those housing units needed to meet the city's or county's share of regional housing need for the 6th cycle of its housing element, as described.
- Who sponsors AB 1748?
- AB 1748 is sponsored by Seyarto, Kelly (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 1748?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1748?
- Track AB 1748 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1748
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1748
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →