Low-embodied carbon building materials: carbon sequestration.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1297 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1297.
You're tracking SB 1297
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1297 — Low-embodied carbon building materials: carbon sequestration.
Last action — August 11 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 designates the State Air Resources Board as the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of emissions of greenhouse gases. Existing law requires the state board, by July 1, 2023, to develop a comprehensive strategy for the state's cement sector to achieve net zero-emissions of greenhouse gases used within the state as soon as possible, but no later than December 31, 2045. Existing law declares that technological carbon removal strategies, such as direct air capture, direct water capture, and carbon capture utilization and sequestration technologies, in addition to dramatic emissions reductions, will be crucial to successfully averting the worst impacts of climate change. Existing law requires the Natural Resources Agency, no later than July 1, 2023, to establish and maintain the California Carbon Sequestration and Climate Resiliency Project Registry for purposes of identifying and listing projects, such as natural and working lands-based carbon sequestration projects and direct air capture projects, in the state that drive climate action on the state's natural and working lands and are seeking funding from state agencies or private entities. Existing law requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) to biennially adopt an integrated energy policy report that contains an overview of major energy trends and issues facing the state, including, but not limited to, supply, demand, pricing, reliability, efficiency, and impacts on public health and safety, the economy, resources, and the environment, and an assessment and forecast of system reliability and the need for resource additions, efficiency, and conservation, as specified. This bill would require the Energy Commission, in consultation with specified state agencies and other entities, to develop a plan as part of the 2023 Integrated Energy Policy Report to advance low-carbon materials and methods in building and construction projects that details a strategy and recommendations to minimize embodied carbon and maximize carbon sequestration in building materials, as provided. The bill would require the state board to develop an accounting protocol to quantify embodied carbon and carbon sequestration in building materials. Following the adoption of that protocol, the bill would require the Natural Resources Agency to incorporate, as appropriate, projects using low-embodied carbon building materials or carbon sequestration in building materials into the California Carbon Sequestration and Climate Resiliency Project Registry. The bill would require the Office of Planning and Research to evaluate the circumstances in which the use of low-embodied carbon building materials or carbon sequestration in building materials is an acceptable mitigation measure pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. This bill would require a public agency, when determined to be feasible and cost effective by the public agency, to prefer the use of building materials with low-embodied carbon in its bid specifications for its public projects, as specified. The bill would also require a public agency, when determined to be feasible and cost effective by the public agency, to prefer the use of building materials with low-embodied carbon that are produced in California in the bid specifications for its public projects. The bill would define "feasible" for these purposes. To the extent this bill imposes additional duties on local agencies, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/23/22 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 23, 2022
- Amended 05/10/22 - Amended Senate pdf May 10, 2022
- Amended 04/27/22 - Amended Senate pdf April 27, 2022
- Amended 04/18/22 - Amended Senate pdf April 18, 2022
- Amended 03/29/22 - Amended Senate pdf March 29, 2022
- Amended 03/14/22 - Amended Senate pdf March 14, 2022
- Introduced 02/18/22 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2022
- SB1297 View text html
Action History
-
August 11 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
August 3 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 20).
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 27. Noes 9. Page 3873.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3791.) (May 19).
-
Set for hearing May 19.
-
May 16 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 16.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1. Page 3517.) (April 26).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
Set for hearing April 26.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on N.R. & W. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3239.) (March 28).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
Set for hearing March 28.
-
Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and N.R. & W.
-
From printer.
-
Article IV Section 8(a) of the Constitution and Joint Rule 55 dispensed with February 7, 2022, suspending the 30 calendar day requirement.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Dave Cortese · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Cortese, Dave Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 0% | 0% | 27% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 9 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 23% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Hertzberg | — | Not Voting |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 11% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1297 do?
- The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 designates the State Air Resources Board as the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of emissions of greenhouse gases. Existing law requires the state board, by July 1, 2023, to develop a comprehensive strategy for the state's cement sector to achieve net zero-emissions of greenhouse gases used within the state as soon as possible, but no later than December 31, 2045. Existing law declares that technological carbon removal strategies, such as direct air capture, direct water capture, and carbon capture utilization and sequestration technologies, in addition to dramatic emissions reductions, will be crucial to successfully averting the worst impacts of climate change. Existing law requires the Natural Resources Agency, no later than July 1, 2023, to establish and maintain the California Carbon Sequestration and Climate Resiliency Project Registry for purposes of identifying and listing projects, such as natural and working lands-based carbon sequestration projects and direct air capture projects, in the state that drive climate action on the state's natural and working lands and are seeking funding from state agencies or private entities. Existing law requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) to biennially adopt an integrated energy policy report that contains an overview of major energy trends and issues facing the state, including, but not limited to, supply, demand, pricing, reliability, efficiency, and impacts on public health and safety, the economy, resources, and the environment, and an assessment and forecast of system reliability and the need for resource additions, efficiency, and conservation, as specified. This bill would require the Energy Commission, in consultation with specified state agencies and other entities, to develop a plan as part of the 2023 Integrated Energy Policy Report to advance low-carbon materials and methods in building and construction projects that details a strategy and recommendations to minimize embodied carbon and maximize carbon sequestration in building materials, as provided. The bill would require the state board to develop an accounting protocol to quantify embodied carbon and carbon sequestration in building materials. Following the adoption of that protocol, the bill would require the Natural Resources Agency to incorporate, as appropriate, projects using low-embodied carbon building materials or carbon sequestration in building materials into the California Carbon Sequestration and Climate Resiliency Project Registry. The bill would require the Office of Planning and Research to evaluate the circumstances in which the use of low-embodied carbon building materials or carbon sequestration in building materials is an acceptable mitigation measure pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. This bill would require a public agency, when determined to be feasible and cost effective by the public agency, to prefer the use of building materials with low-embodied carbon in its bid specifications for its public projects, as specified. The bill would also require a public agency, when determined to be feasible and cost effective by the public agency, to prefer the use of building materials with low-embodied carbon that are produced in California in the bid specifications for its public projects. The bill would define "feasible" for these purposes. To the extent this bill imposes additional duties on local agencies, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors SB 1297?
- SB 1297 is sponsored by Cortese, Dave (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 1297?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1297?
- Track SB 1297 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1297
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1297
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →