Electricity: resource adequacy requirements.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 427 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 427.
You're tracking AB 427
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 427 — Electricity: resource adequacy requirements.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing law requires the PUC, in consultation with the Independent System Operator (ISO) , to establish resource adequacy requirements for all load-serving entities, defined to include electrical corporations, community choice aggregators, and electric service providers. Existing law requires that the resource adequacy program achieve specified objectives, including to establish new or maintain existing demand response products and tariffs that facilitate the economic dispatch and use of demand response that can either meet or reduce an electrical corporation's resource adequacy requirements, as determined by the PUC. This bill would require the PUC, by July 1, 2022, to establish a capacity valuation methodology for customer-sited energy storage resources and customer-sited hybrid resources, as defined, in consultation with the ISO and the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, for the 2023 resource adequacy year.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/26/21 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 26, 2021
- Introduced 02/04/21 - Introduced pdf February 04, 2021
- AB427 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (April 21).
-
Referred to Com. on U. & E.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 7.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Rebecca Bauer-Kahan · Primary
- Henry I. Stern · Cosponsor
- Steve Bennett · Cosponsor
- Christopher M. Ward · Cosponsor
- Josh Becker · Cosponsor
- Chiu · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 116 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic
Co-sponsors (5)
- Stern, Henry I. Democratic
- Bennett, Steve Democratic
- Ward, Christopher M. Democratic
- Becker, Josh Democratic
- Chiu
Not signed on (116)
116 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 116 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 13% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Carrillo, Juan | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 427 do?
- Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing law requires the PUC, in consultation with the Independent System Operator (ISO) , to establish resource adequacy requirements for all load-serving entities, defined to include electrical corporations, community choice aggregators, and electric service providers. Existing law requires that the resource adequacy program achieve specified objectives, including to establish new or maintain existing demand response products and tariffs that facilitate the economic dispatch and use of demand response that can either meet or reduce an electrical corporation's resource adequacy requirements, as determined by the PUC. This bill would require the PUC, by July 1, 2022, to establish a capacity valuation methodology for customer-sited energy storage resources and customer-sited hybrid resources, as defined, in consultation with the ISO and the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, for the 2023 resource adequacy year.
- Who sponsors AB 427?
- AB 427 is sponsored by Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca (Democratic), Stern, Henry I. (Democratic), Bennett, Steve (Democratic), Ward, Christopher M. (Democratic), Becker, Josh (Democratic), and Chiu.
- What is the current status of AB 427?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 427?
- Track AB 427 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 427
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 427
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →