Proposition 47: repeal.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1599 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1599.
You're tracking AB 1599
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1599 — Proposition 47: repeal.
Last action — From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, enacted as an initiative statute by Proposition 47, as approved by the electors at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election, made various changes relating to theft and the possession of controlled substances, including by, among other things, generally reducing the penalty for those crimes, including reducing the penalty for possession of concentrated cannabis, establishing a procedure by which individuals convicted of those crimes prior to the passage of the act may petition for resentencing under the act, and creating the crime of shoplifting. The act also requires the Director of Finance to calculate the savings accruing to the state as a result of the implementation of the act and requires the Controller to transfer that sum from the General Fund to the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund, which was created by the act. The act specifies the manner of distribution of those funds and the purposes for which they may be used. This bill would repeal the changes and additions made by Proposition 47, except those related to reducing the penalty for possession of concentrated cannabis. Existing law makes it a crime for a caretaker of an elder or a dependent adult, or a person who is not a caretaker and who knows or reasonably should know that the victim is an elder or a dependent adult, to violate specified laws proscribing theft, embezzlement, forgery, fraud, or identity theft with respect to the property or personal identifying information of that elder or dependent adult. Existing law makes a violation of those provisions punishable as a misdemeanor or a felony when the moneys, labor, goods, services, or real or personal property taken or obtained is of a value exceeding $950. This bill would reduce the value threshold for a violation of those provisions to be punishable as a felony from $950 to $400. Existing law defines grand theft as the wrongful taking of money, labor, or property of a value exceeding $950, except as specified. Existing law also makes it grand theft where the money, labor, or real or personal property is taken by a servant, agent, or employee from their principal or employer and aggregates $950 or more in any consecutive 12-month period. This bill would reduce the value threshold for committing grand theft under those provisions from $950 to $400. This bill would provide that it would become effective only upon approval of the voters, and would provide for the submission of this measure to the voters for approval at the next statewide general election.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/01/22 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 01, 2022
- Introduced 01/03/22 - Introduced pdf January 03, 2022
- AB1599 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage.
-
Coauthors revised.
-
In committee: Reconsideration granted.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
-
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 3.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Nielsen · Cosponsor
- Bates · Cosponsor
- Wilk · Cosponsor
- Dahle · Cosponsor
- Shannon Grove · Cosponsor
- Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh · Cosponsor
- Kiley · Primary
- James Gallagher · Cosponsor
- Steven S. Choi · Cosponsor
- Laurie Davies · Cosponsor
- Heath Flora · Cosponsor
- Tom Lackey · Cosponsor
- Kelly Seyarto · Cosponsor
- Smith · Cosponsor
- Waldron · Cosponsor
- Bigelow · Cosponsor
- Phillip Chen · Cosponsor
- Megan Dahle · Cosponsor
- Mathis · Cosponsor
- Suzette Martinez Valladares · Cosponsor
- Voepel · Cosponsor
- Brian W. Jones · Cosponsor
- Melendez · Cosponsor
- Mike Fong · Cosponsor
- Stephanie Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Joe Patterson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 25 co-sponsors · 96 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Kiley
Co-sponsors (25)
- Nielsen
- Bates
- Wilk
- Dahle
- Grove, Shannon Republican
- Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican
- Gallagher, James Republican
- Choi, Steven S. Republican
- Davies, Laurie Republican
- Flora, Heath Republican
- Lackey, Tom Republican
- Seyarto, Kelly Republican
- Smith
- Waldron
- Bigelow
- Chen, Phillip Republican
- Dahle, Megan Republican
- Mathis
- Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican
- Voepel
- Jones, Brian W. Republican
- Melendez
- Fong, Mike Democratic
- Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic
- Patterson, Joe Republican
Not signed on (96)
96 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 96 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 29% | 71% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Nay |
| Santiago | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Nay |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 29% | 71% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Santiago | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Nay |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1599 do?
- The Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, enacted as an initiative statute by Proposition 47, as approved by the electors at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election, made various changes relating to theft and the possession of controlled substances, including by, among other things, generally reducing the penalty for those crimes, including reducing the penalty for possession of concentrated cannabis, establishing a procedure by which individuals convicted of those crimes prior to the passage of the act may petition for resentencing under the act, and creating the crime of shoplifting. The act also requires the Director of Finance to calculate the savings accruing to the state as a result of the implementation of the act and requires the Controller to transfer that sum from the General Fund to the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund, which was created by the act. The act specifies the manner of distribution of those funds and the purposes for which they may be used. This bill would repeal the changes and additions made by Proposition 47, except those related to reducing the penalty for possession of concentrated cannabis. Existing law makes it a crime for a caretaker of an elder or a dependent adult, or a person who is not a caretaker and who knows or reasonably should know that the victim is an elder or a dependent adult, to violate specified laws proscribing theft, embezzlement, forgery, fraud, or identity theft with respect to the property or personal identifying information of that elder or dependent adult. Existing law makes a violation of those provisions punishable as a misdemeanor or a felony when the moneys, labor, goods, services, or real or personal property taken or obtained is of a value exceeding $950. This bill would reduce the value threshold for a violation of those provisions to be punishable as a felony from $950 to $400. Existing law defines grand theft as the wrongful taking of money, labor, or property of a value exceeding $950, except as specified. Existing law also makes it grand theft where the money, labor, or real or personal property is taken by a servant, agent, or employee from their principal or employer and aggregates $950 or more in any consecutive 12-month period. This bill would reduce the value threshold for committing grand theft under those provisions from $950 to $400. This bill would provide that it would become effective only upon approval of the voters, and would provide for the submission of this measure to the voters for approval at the next statewide general election.
- Who sponsors AB 1599?
- AB 1599 is sponsored by Nielsen, Bates, Wilk, Dahle, Grove, Shannon (Republican), Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie (Republican), Kiley, Gallagher, James (Republican), Choi, Steven S. (Republican), Davies, Laurie (Republican), Flora, Heath (Republican), Lackey, Tom (Republican), Seyarto, Kelly (Republican), Smith, Waldron, Bigelow, Chen, Phillip (Republican), Dahle, Megan (Republican), Mathis, Valladares, Suzette Martinez (Republican), Voepel, Jones, Brian W. (Republican), Melendez, Fong, Mike (Democratic), Nguyen, Stephanie (Democratic), and Patterson, Joe (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 1599?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1599?
- Track AB 1599 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1599
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1599
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →