AB 993 — The parent and child relationship.

Summary

(1) The Uniform Parentage Act defines the parent and child relationship as the legal relationship existing between a child and the child's parents, and provides rebuttable presumptions as to the parentage of a child born under the circumstances of conception through assisted reproduction using donated ova, sperm, or both. The act defines "assisted reproduction" for these purposes to mean conception by any means other than sexual intercourse. This bill would establish that a provider of an embryo for use in assisted reproduction to an intended parent who is not the provider's spouse or nonmarital partner is treated in law as if the provider is not the natural parent of a child thereby conceived unless the court finds satisfactory evidence that the provider and the intended parent intended for the provider to be a parent. If a donated embryo includes ova or sperm from a person other than a provider of the embryo, the bill would require that person's consent to the donation unless the person has executed a writing to consent, waive, or relinquish their right to the embryo, or as otherwise ordered by a court of law. (2) Existing law permits a proceeding to be brought for the purpose of having a child under 18 years of age declared free from the custody and control of either or both parents when the child's parent or parents have been convicted of a felony of a nature that proves the unfitness of the parent or parents to have future custody and control of the child. Existing law authorizes the court to consider the parent's criminal record prior to the felony conviction for these purposes. This bill instead would require the court to consider the parent's criminal record, and would not restrict that consideration to the period prior to the felony conviction. Existing law authorizes specified individuals to provide the court with a written recommendation of the proper disposition to be made in the best interest of the child, and specifies the contents of that report. This bill would recast and revise those provisions and would add to the required contents of the report a summary of the child's past and current living circumstances and residence history, a background summary regarding each nonagency party to the case, and a recommendation whether granting or denying the petition would serve the child's best interest. The bill would require each party to cooperate with the investigation. (3) Existing law authorizes an adoption request for the adoption of a nondependent minor to be filed with the court in the county in which one of specified criteria applies and sets forth those individuals who may file an adoption request. Under existing law, an order of adoption is required to contain the child's adopted name, but not the name of the child before the adoption. This bill would add to the list of persons authorized to file an adoption request a person named in a court order terminating parental rights as the child's legal guardian or prospective adoptive parent. The bill would require the adoption order to include both the child's adopted name and the name of the child before the adoption. The bill would replace references to an adoption petition and refer instead to an adoption request. (4) Existing law declares that some adoptive children may benefit from contact with birth relatives, as specified, after being adopted, and that postadoption contact agreements are intended to ensure children of an achievable level of continuing contact when contact is beneficial to the children and the agreements are voluntarily executed by the parties. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to adopt rules of court and forms for motions to enforce, terminate, or modify postadoption contact agreements. This bill would, among other things, additionally find and declare that some adoptive children may benefit from contact with nonrelative extended family members. The bill would require the court, at the time an adoption decree is entered, to grant postadoption contact privileges, as specified. The bill would add a definition of birth relative, for purposes of these provisions. The bill would require that a petitioner inform the court in writing whether the petitioners have entered or plan to enter into a postadoption contact agreement, as specified. (5) Existing law prohibits any person who has not petitioned to adopt a child from removing the child from the county in which the child was placed without first obtaining the written consent of the licensed adoption agency. Existing law further prohibits the child proposed to be adopted from being concealed within the county in which the adoption proceeding is pending. This bill would, among other things, prohibit the child proposed to be adopted from being concealed from the agency that is investigating the adoption or from the court with jurisdiction over the adoption proceeding. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

• Amended 06/25/21 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 25, 2021
• Amended 03/18/21 - Amended Assembly pdf March 18, 2021
• Introduced 02/18/21 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2021
• AB993 View text html

Action History

1. August 26, 2021

   In committee: Held under submission.

2. August 16, 2021

   In committee: Referred to suspense file.

3. July 07, 2021

   From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

4. June 25, 2021

   From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

5. June 16, 2021

   Referred to Com. on JUD.

6. June 03, 2021

   In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

7. June 02, 2021

   Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1823.)

8. May 24, 2021

   Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

9. May 20, 2021

   From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 20).

10. April 21, 2021

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

11. April 06, 2021

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

12. March 22, 2021

    Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

13. March 18, 2021

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

14. March 04, 2021

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

15. February 19, 2021

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.

16. February 18, 2021

    Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

• Joe Patterson · Primary

Votes

Subjects