Personal information: social security numbers: state agencies: Employment Development Department: fraud pre...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 58 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 58.
You're tracking SB 58
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 58 — Personal information: social security numbers: state agencies: Employment Development Department: fraud prevention.
Last action — August 26 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law prohibits a state agency from sending any outgoing United States mail to an individual that contains personal information about that individual, including, but not limited to, the individual's social security number, telephone number, driver's license number, or credit card account number, unless that personal information is contained within sealed correspondence and cannot be viewed from the outside of that sealed correspondence. Existing law, commencing on or before January 1, 2023, prohibits a state agency from sending any outgoing United States mail that contains an individual's social security number unless the number is truncated to its last 4 digits or in specified circumstances. This bill would instead require, as soon as feasible, but not later than January 1, 2023, a state agency to stop sending any outgoing United States mail that contains an individual's social security number unless the number is truncated to its last 4 digits or in specified circumstances. The bill, commencing on or before October 1, 2021, would prohibit, with exceptions, the Employment Development Department from sending any outgoing United States mail to an individual containing the individual's social security number, unless that social security number is replaced with a modified unique identifier or the number is truncated to its last 4 digits. Existing law creates, in the Labor and Workforce Development Agency, the Employment Development Department, which is vested with the duties, purposes, responsibilities, and jurisdiction with respect to job creation activities. Existing law requires the Director of Employment Development to periodically review policies and practices used to determine eligibility for and the amount of benefits in the unemployment insurance program to identify those policies and practices doing certain things, including, but not limited to, providing little or no value in identifying or preventing fraud or abuse in the unemployment insurance program. This bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2022, to identify the fraud prevention efforts it can adjust to improve effectiveness during periods of high demand for benefits. The bill would also require the department, on or before January 1, 2022, using existing resources, to designate a single unit responsible for coordinating fraud prevention and align the unit's duties with best practices for detecting and preventing fraud. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/21/21 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 21, 2021
- Amended 04/27/21 - Amended Senate pdf April 27, 2021
- Amended 03/15/21 - Amended Senate pdf March 15, 2021
- Introduced 12/07/20 - Introduced pdf December 07, 2020
- SB58 View text html
Action History
-
August 26 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
July 7 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on INS. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 17).
-
Referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and INS.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1059.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
April 19 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing April 19.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 590.) (March 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing March 23.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 406.) (March 8). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing March 8.
-
Referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and JUD.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 7.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Bates · Cosponsor
- Borgeas · Cosponsor
- Anna M. Caballero · Cosponsor
- Dodd · Cosponsor
- Glazer · Cosponsor
- Shannon Grove · Cosponsor
- Hueso · Cosponsor
- Brian W. Jones · Cosponsor
- Melendez · Cosponsor
- Newman · Cosponsor
- Nielsen · Cosponsor
- Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh · Cosponsor
- Roth · Cosponsor
- Tom Lackey · Cosponsor
- Wilk · Primary
- Melissa Hurtado · Cosponsor
- Kelly Seyarto · Cosponsor
- Suzette Martinez Valladares · Cosponsor
- Megan Dahle · Cosponsor
- Jim Patterson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 19 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Wilk
Co-sponsors (19)
- Bates
- Borgeas
- Caballero, Anna M. Democratic
- Dodd
- Glazer
- Grove, Shannon Republican
- Hueso
- Jones, Brian W. Republican
- Melendez
- Newman
- Nielsen
- Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican
- Roth
- Lackey, Tom Republican
- Hurtado, Melissa Democratic
- Seyarto, Kelly Republican
- Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican
- Dahle, Megan Republican
- Jim Patterson
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Carrillo, Juan | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 58 do?
- Existing law prohibits a state agency from sending any outgoing United States mail to an individual that contains personal information about that individual, including, but not limited to, the individual's social security number, telephone number, driver's license number, or credit card account number, unless that personal information is contained within sealed correspondence and cannot be viewed from the outside of that sealed correspondence. Existing law, commencing on or before January 1, 2023, prohibits a state agency from sending any outgoing United States mail that contains an individual's social security number unless the number is truncated to its last 4 digits or in specified circumstances. This bill would instead require, as soon as feasible, but not later than January 1, 2023, a state agency to stop sending any outgoing United States mail that contains an individual's social security number unless the number is truncated to its last 4 digits or in specified circumstances. The bill, commencing on or before October 1, 2021, would prohibit, with exceptions, the Employment Development Department from sending any outgoing United States mail to an individual containing the individual's social security number, unless that social security number is replaced with a modified unique identifier or the number is truncated to its last 4 digits. Existing law creates, in the Labor and Workforce Development Agency, the Employment Development Department, which is vested with the duties, purposes, responsibilities, and jurisdiction with respect to job creation activities. Existing law requires the Director of Employment Development to periodically review policies and practices used to determine eligibility for and the amount of benefits in the unemployment insurance program to identify those policies and practices doing certain things, including, but not limited to, providing little or no value in identifying or preventing fraud or abuse in the unemployment insurance program. This bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2022, to identify the fraud prevention efforts it can adjust to improve effectiveness during periods of high demand for benefits. The bill would also require the department, on or before January 1, 2022, using existing resources, to designate a single unit responsible for coordinating fraud prevention and align the unit's duties with best practices for detecting and preventing fraud. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 58?
- SB 58 is sponsored by Bates, Borgeas, Caballero, Anna M. (Democratic), Dodd, Glazer, Grove, Shannon (Republican), Hueso, Jones, Brian W. (Republican), Melendez, Newman, Nielsen, Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie (Republican), Roth, Lackey, Tom (Republican), Wilk, Hurtado, Melissa (Democratic), Seyarto, Kelly (Republican), Valladares, Suzette Martinez (Republican), Dahle, Megan (Republican), and Jim Patterson.
- What is the current status of SB 58?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 58?
- Track SB 58 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 58
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 58
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →