Child support: enforcement.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 454 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 454.
You're tracking SB 454
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 454 — Child support: enforcement.
Last action — August 26 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law imposes a general obligation on both parents of a minor child to support their child in the manner suitable to the child's circumstances. Existing law establishes the statewide uniform guidelines for calculating court-ordered child support, based on the income of both parents and the time each parent spends with the child. Existing law authorizes, if a support obligor is delinquent in paying child support and the local child support agency is enforcing a support obligation, a lien for child support against the personal property of the obligor in specified circumstances. Existing law defines "support obligor is delinquent in payment of support" to mean that the support obligor has failed to make a payment equal to one month's support obligation. Existing law requires the Department of Child Support Services to administer all services and perform all functions necessary to establish, collect, and distribute child support, and requires the department and the local child support agency to promptly and effectively collect and enforce child support obligations. Existing law also authorizes the transmission, filing, and recording of a lien record by departmental and local child support agency staff against the real property of a delinquent support obligor, as specified. Existing law authorizes a child support agency to record a notice of support judgment. This bill would instead define "support obligor is delinquent in payment of support" to mean that the support obligor is over $1,000 in arrears on their support obligation or has failed to make payments equal to 3 months of their support obligation, whichever occurs first. The bill would instead authorize a child support agency to record a notice of support judgment when overdue support exceeds $1,000 or when the support obligor has failed to make payments equal to 3 months of their support obligation, whichever occurs first, regardless of whether the amounts of overdue support have been adjudicated or otherwise determined. This bill would provide that if the local child support agency is enforcing the support obligation, as specified, a lien for child support arises, by operation of law, against the real property of the support obligor when the support obligor owes overdue support over $1,000 or when the support obligor has failed to make payments equal to 3 months of their support obligation, whichever occurs first. The bill would require the department to adopt or amend regulations to implement these provisions by March 31, 2022, and would authorize the department, until regulations are adopted or revised, to implement and administer these provisions through a child support services letter or similar instruction.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/03/21 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 03, 2021
- Amended 03/25/21 - Amended Senate pdf March 25, 2021
- Amended 03/04/21 - Amended Senate pdf March 04, 2021
- Introduced 02/16/21 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2021
- SB454 View text html
Action History
-
August 26 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
July 14 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 885.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 687.) (April 6).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing April 6.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Joint Rule 55 suspended. (Ayes 32. Noes 4. Page 272.)
-
(Ayes 32. Noes 4.)
-
Art. IV. Sec. 8(a) of the Constitution dispensed with.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 19.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Bates · Primary
- Steven S. Choi · Cosponsor
- Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Phillip Chen · Cosponsor
- Daly · Cosponsor
- Laurie Davies · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 116 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Bates
Co-sponsors (5)
- Choi, Steven S. Republican
- Nguyen
- Chen, Phillip Republican
- Daly
- Davies, Laurie Republican
Not signed on (116)
116 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 116 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 454 do?
- Existing law imposes a general obligation on both parents of a minor child to support their child in the manner suitable to the child's circumstances. Existing law establishes the statewide uniform guidelines for calculating court-ordered child support, based on the income of both parents and the time each parent spends with the child. Existing law authorizes, if a support obligor is delinquent in paying child support and the local child support agency is enforcing a support obligation, a lien for child support against the personal property of the obligor in specified circumstances. Existing law defines "support obligor is delinquent in payment of support" to mean that the support obligor has failed to make a payment equal to one month's support obligation. Existing law requires the Department of Child Support Services to administer all services and perform all functions necessary to establish, collect, and distribute child support, and requires the department and the local child support agency to promptly and effectively collect and enforce child support obligations. Existing law also authorizes the transmission, filing, and recording of a lien record by departmental and local child support agency staff against the real property of a delinquent support obligor, as specified. Existing law authorizes a child support agency to record a notice of support judgment. This bill would instead define "support obligor is delinquent in payment of support" to mean that the support obligor is over $1,000 in arrears on their support obligation or has failed to make payments equal to 3 months of their support obligation, whichever occurs first. The bill would instead authorize a child support agency to record a notice of support judgment when overdue support exceeds $1,000 or when the support obligor has failed to make payments equal to 3 months of their support obligation, whichever occurs first, regardless of whether the amounts of overdue support have been adjudicated or otherwise determined. This bill would provide that if the local child support agency is enforcing the support obligation, as specified, a lien for child support arises, by operation of law, against the real property of the support obligor when the support obligor owes overdue support over $1,000 or when the support obligor has failed to make payments equal to 3 months of their support obligation, whichever occurs first. The bill would require the department to adopt or amend regulations to implement these provisions by March 31, 2022, and would authorize the department, until regulations are adopted or revised, to implement and administer these provisions through a child support services letter or similar instruction.
- Who sponsors SB 454?
- SB 454 is sponsored by Bates, Choi, Steven S. (Republican), Nguyen, Chen, Phillip (Republican), Daly, and Davies, Laurie (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 454?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 454?
- Track SB 454 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 454
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 454
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →