AB 430 — Debt collection: identity theft.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 265, Statutes of 2021.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 04, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 9 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law requires a debt collector to cease collection activities until completion of a specified review if it receives a copy of a police report filed by the debtor alleging that the debtor is the victim of an identity theft crime and it receives a written statement from the debtor that the debtor claims to be the victim of identity theft, with respect to the specific debt being collected by the debt collector. This bill, instead, would require a debt collector to cease collection activities until completion of a review if it receives a copy of a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) identity theft report and a written statement from the debtor. The bill would authorize a debtor to choose to send a copy of a police report, as specified, but prohibit a debt collector from also requiring a police report if the debtor submits an FTC identity theft report. Existing law specifies that if service of a summons has not resulted in actual notice to a person in time to defend an action brought by a debt buyer and a default or default judgment has been entered against the person in the action, the person may serve and file a notice of motion and motion to set aside the default or default judgment and for leave to defend the action. Existing law requires the notice of motion to be served and filed, in the case of identity theft, within a reasonable time, but in no event exceeding 180 days of the first actual notice of the action. Existing law also requires, in the case of identity theft, that the person alleging that they are a victim of identity theft provide the court with either a copy of a Federal Trade Commission Identity Theft Affidavit or a copy of a police report. This bill, instead, would require the person alleging that they are a victim of identity theft to provide the court with either a copy of a Federal Trade Commission identity theft report or a copy of a police report. The bill would make other nonsubstantive changes. Existing law authorizes a person to bring an action against a claimant to establish that the person is a victim of identity theft, in connection with the claimant's claim against that person; if the claimant has brought an action to recover on its claim against the person, existing law authorizes the person to file a cross-complaint to establish that the person is a victim of identity theft in connection with the claimant's claim. Existing law defines a "victim of identity theft" for purposes of these provisions as a person who has filed a police report alleging a crime, as specified. In order for a person to recover actual damages or attorney's fees in an action or cross-complaint filed by a person alleging that they are a victim of identity theft, existing law requires that the person show that they provided the claimant, upon written request of claimant, a valid copy of a police report or a Department of Motor Vehicles investigative report before filing the action, or within their cross-complaint, as specified. This bill would change the definition of the phrase "victim of identity theft" for purposes of these provisions to also include a person who has submitted an FTC identity theft report. This bill would require, in order for a person to recover actual damages or attorney's fees in an action or cross-complaint filed by a person alleging that they are a victim of identity theft, that the person, upon written request of the claimant, provided the claimant a valid, signed FTC identity theft report before filing the action or within their cross-complaint, as specified. The bill would authorize a person to provide a valid copy of a police report or a Department of Motor Vehicles investigative report, as specified, but prohibit the claimant from also requiring a DMV or police report if the person submits an FTC identity theft report. Existing law authorizes a person to receive information relating to an application or account that was filed with any person or entity by an unauthorized person upon presenting the person or entity with which the application was filed or the account was opened a copy of a police report and identifying information, as specified. This bill would also authorize a person to receive this information upon presenting the person or entity with which the application was filed or the account was opened a copy of a signed and submitted FTC identity theft report and identifying information, as specified. The bill would make other conforming changes.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/23/21 - Chaptered Current pdf September 23, 2021
- Enrolled 09/09/21 - Enrolled pdf September 09, 2021
- Amended 06/24/21 - Amended Senate pdf June 24, 2021
- Amended 04/21/21 - Amended Assembly pdf April 21, 2021
- Amended 04/06/21 - Amended Assembly pdf April 06, 2021
- Amended 03/18/21 - Amended Assembly pdf March 18, 2021
- Introduced 02/04/21 - Introduced pdf February 04, 2021
- AB430 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 265, Statutes of 2021.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 2842.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 5 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2389.).
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 26).
-
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 22).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 9). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I., JUD. and APPR.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1250.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 20).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
(pending re-refer to Com. on JUD.)
-
Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 924.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 7.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Timothy S. Grayson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 38 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 25 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 72 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Not Voting |
| Rendon | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Not Voting |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Min | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 77 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Carrillo, Juan | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 430 do?
- Existing law requires a debt collector to cease collection activities until completion of a specified review if it receives a copy of a police report filed by the debtor alleging that the debtor is the victim of an identity theft crime and it receives a written statement from the debtor that the debtor claims to be the victim of identity theft, with respect to the specific debt being collected by the debt collector. This bill, instead, would require a debt collector to cease collection activities until completion of a review if it receives a copy of a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) identity theft report and a written statement from the debtor. The bill would authorize a debtor to choose to send a copy of a police report, as specified, but prohibit a debt collector from also requiring a police report if the debtor submits an FTC identity theft report. Existing law specifies that if service of a summons has not resulted in actual notice to a person in time to defend an action brought by a debt buyer and a default or default judgment has been entered against the person in the action, the person may serve and file a notice of motion and motion to set aside the default or default judgment and for leave to defend the action. Existing law requires the notice of motion to be served and filed, in the case of identity theft, within a reasonable time, but in no event exceeding 180 days of the first actual notice of the action. Existing law also requires, in the case of identity theft, that the person alleging that they are a victim of identity theft provide the court with either a copy of a Federal Trade Commission Identity Theft Affidavit or a copy of a police report. This bill, instead, would require the person alleging that they are a victim of identity theft to provide the court with either a copy of a Federal Trade Commission identity theft report or a copy of a police report. The bill would make other nonsubstantive changes. Existing law authorizes a person to bring an action against a claimant to establish that the person is a victim of identity theft, in connection with the claimant's claim against that person; if the claimant has brought an action to recover on its claim against the person, existing law authorizes the person to file a cross-complaint to establish that the person is a victim of identity theft in connection with the claimant's claim. Existing law defines a "victim of identity theft" for purposes of these provisions as a person who has filed a police report alleging a crime, as specified. In order for a person to recover actual damages or attorney's fees in an action or cross-complaint filed by a person alleging that they are a victim of identity theft, existing law requires that the person show that they provided the claimant, upon written request of claimant, a valid copy of a police report or a Department of Motor Vehicles investigative report before filing the action, or within their cross-complaint, as specified. This bill would change the definition of the phrase "victim of identity theft" for purposes of these provisions to also include a person who has submitted an FTC identity theft report. This bill would require, in order for a person to recover actual damages or attorney's fees in an action or cross-complaint filed by a person alleging that they are a victim of identity theft, that the person, upon written request of the claimant, provided the claimant a valid, signed FTC identity theft report before filing the action or within their cross-complaint, as specified. The bill would authorize a person to provide a valid copy of a police report or a Department of Motor Vehicles investigative report, as specified, but prohibit the claimant from also requiring a DMV or police report if the person submits an FTC identity theft report. Existing law authorizes a person to receive information relating to an application or account that was filed with any person or entity by an unauthorized person upon presenting the person or entity with which the application was filed or the account was opened a copy of a police report and identifying information, as specified. This bill would also authorize a person to receive this information upon presenting the person or entity with which the application was filed or the account was opened a copy of a signed and submitted FTC identity theft report and identifying information, as specified. The bill would make other conforming changes.
- Who sponsors AB 430?
- AB 430 is sponsored by Grayson, Timothy S. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 430?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 04, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 430?
- Track AB 430 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 430
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 430
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →