Local agencies: transient occupancy taxes: short-term rental facilitator: collection.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 555 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 555.
You're tracking SB 555
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 555 — Local agencies: transient occupancy taxes: short-term rental facilitator: collection.
Last action — August 26 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a city, county, or city and county to impose taxes within its jurisdiction, as provided, including a transient occupancy tax, which is generally paid by a person for the privilege of occupying a room or rooms, or other living space, in a hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, or other lodging for a period of less than 30 days. This bill would authorize a local agency, defined to mean a city, county, or city and county, including a charter city, county, or city and county, to enact an ordinance exclusively delegating its authority to collect any transient occupancy tax imposed by that local agency on short-term rentals to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration and to enter into a contract with the department for purposes of registration, rate posting, collection, and transmission of revenues necessary to collect and administer any transient occupancy tax imposed on a short-term rental as specified in this bill. This bill would define a short-term rental to mean the occupancy of a home, house, a room in a home or house, or other lodging that is not a hotel or motel in this state for a period of 30 days or less and under any other circumstances specified by the local agency in its ordinance that is facilitated by a short-term rental facilitator, as defined. This bill would require the department to perform those functions, as specified, and would require all local charges collected by the department to be deposited in the Local Charges for Short-term Rentals Fund, which would be created by the bill in the State Treasury. This bill would appropriate all amounts in the fund to the department and would require the department to transmit the funds to the local agencies periodically as promptly as feasible, as provided. This bill would require a short-term rental facilitator engaged in business in this state to be responsible for collecting from the purchaser any local charge imposed on a short-term rental by any local agency exclusively delegating its authority to the department pursuant to this bill to collect those charges and would require the short-term rental facilitator to register with the department. The bill would require the department to administer and collect the local charges pursuant to the Fee Collection Procedures Law. This bill would also make it a misdemeanor for any deputy, agent, clerk, or other officer or employee of the department, or any former officer or employee or other individual, who in the course of that individual's employment or duty has or had access to returns, reports, or documents required to be filed under this bill, to disclose or make known in any manner information as to the amount of any local charges or any particulars, including the business affairs of a corporation, set forth or disclosed therein. By extending the application of the Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, and imposing a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 07/14/21 - Amended Assembly Current pdf July 14, 2021
- Amended 04/12/21 - Amended Senate pdf April 12, 2021
- Introduced 02/18/21 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2021
- SB555 View text html
Action History
-
August 26 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
August 19 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 13).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Coms. on REV. & TAX. and JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1346.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1196.) (May 20).
-
Set for hearing May 20.
-
May 3 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 860.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing April 20.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 633.) (March 25). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing March 25.
-
Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and JUD.
-
Joint Rule 55 suspended. (Ayes 32. Noes 4. Page 272.)
-
(Ayes 32. Noes 4.)
-
Art. IV. Sec. 8(a) of the Constitution dispensed with.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Mike McGuire · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- McGuire, Mike Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 555 do?
- Existing law authorizes a city, county, or city and county to impose taxes within its jurisdiction, as provided, including a transient occupancy tax, which is generally paid by a person for the privilege of occupying a room or rooms, or other living space, in a hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, or other lodging for a period of less than 30 days. This bill would authorize a local agency, defined to mean a city, county, or city and county, including a charter city, county, or city and county, to enact an ordinance exclusively delegating its authority to collect any transient occupancy tax imposed by that local agency on short-term rentals to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration and to enter into a contract with the department for purposes of registration, rate posting, collection, and transmission of revenues necessary to collect and administer any transient occupancy tax imposed on a short-term rental as specified in this bill. This bill would define a short-term rental to mean the occupancy of a home, house, a room in a home or house, or other lodging that is not a hotel or motel in this state for a period of 30 days or less and under any other circumstances specified by the local agency in its ordinance that is facilitated by a short-term rental facilitator, as defined. This bill would require the department to perform those functions, as specified, and would require all local charges collected by the department to be deposited in the Local Charges for Short-term Rentals Fund, which would be created by the bill in the State Treasury. This bill would appropriate all amounts in the fund to the department and would require the department to transmit the funds to the local agencies periodically as promptly as feasible, as provided. This bill would require a short-term rental facilitator engaged in business in this state to be responsible for collecting from the purchaser any local charge imposed on a short-term rental by any local agency exclusively delegating its authority to the department pursuant to this bill to collect those charges and would require the short-term rental facilitator to register with the department. The bill would require the department to administer and collect the local charges pursuant to the Fee Collection Procedures Law. This bill would also make it a misdemeanor for any deputy, agent, clerk, or other officer or employee of the department, or any former officer or employee or other individual, who in the course of that individual's employment or duty has or had access to returns, reports, or documents required to be filed under this bill, to disclose or make known in any manner information as to the amount of any local charges or any particulars, including the business affairs of a corporation, set forth or disclosed therein. By extending the application of the Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, and imposing a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 555?
- SB 555 is sponsored by McGuire, Mike (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 555?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 555?
- Track SB 555 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 555
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 555
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →