Bees.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 719 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 719.
You're tracking AB 719
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 719 — Bees.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 683, Statutes of 2022.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law creates the Apiary Board within the Department of Food and Agriculture. Existing law requires the board to consist of 5 members that are appointed by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture. Existing law requires those members to be assessment-paying beekeepers that reside in California and represent the major geographical divisions of the beekeeping industry. Existing law authorizes the secretary to appoint an additional member on the board as a public member. This bill would increase the number of board members from 5 to 7. The bill would require 6 of the 7 board members to be registered beekeepers that reside in California and are representative of the industry functions of queen breeding, pollination, or honey production. The bill would authorize the secretary to appoint the 7th member of the board, who shall be a public member. The bill would authorize the secretary, in consultation with the board, to identify a representative from the California Agricultural Commissioners and Sealers Association and a member of the industry that represents pollinated crops to serve as subject matter experts at board meetings. (2) Existing law, for purposes of the Apiary Protection Act, defines "pest" to mean American foulbrood or any other infectious disease, parasite, pest, or hereditary disease that affects bees that the secretary declares by regulations is detrimental to the welfare of the bee industry. This bill would revise the definition of "pest" to, among other things, require those regulations be done in consultation with the association representing the beekeeping industry and the board. The bill would also revise the definition of "infected," "infested," "contaminated," or "diseased." The bill would also revise the definition of "inspector." (3) Existing law, the Apiary Protection Act, requires an owner or a person in charge or possession of an apiary to comply with certain requirements, including to register the number of colonies in each apiary and the location of each apiary and to abate an infestation of an apiary upon finding an infestation to be present or receiving notice of an infestation. Under existing law, failure to comply with any requirement under the Apiary Protection Act is a crime. This bill would apply certain requirements under the Apiary Protection Act to brokers, which the bill would define as a person or entity that receives a monetary profit from the managing of beehives, hive equipment, or honey bees that they do not own, but have control of, through a private or public agreement between one or more parties. By extending certain requirements to brokers, the violation of which would be a crime, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law authorizes any person to transport any contaminated hive, together with its contents, or any contaminated comb, including any frame associated with it, to a suitable place for burning, or to a licensed wax salvage plant, as specified. This bill would instead authorize any person under the supervision of the local county agricultural commissioner to transport any contaminated hive, together with its contents, or any contaminated comb, including any frame associated with it, to a suitable place for burning or disposal, or to a licensed wax salvage plant, as specified. (5) Existing law provides that no person shall move or transport any bees, comb, appliances, or colonies within the state that are diseased, except as specified. Existing law authorizes the inspector, in a summary manner, to destroy where required, any and all diseased colonies, bees, combs, or hives that are unlawfully moved within the state wherever they may be found. This bill would instead apply the above provisions to colonies, bees, combs, appliances, or hives that contain pests. (6) Existing law requires a beekeeper to report to the agricultural commissioner of the county in which the beekeeper's apiary is located, on a form approved by the secretary, each location of apiaries for which notification of pesticide usage is sought. Existing law requires each request, except as specified, to be mailed within 72 hours before locating an apiary, where feasible, but in no event later than 72 hours after locating an apiary. This bill would authorize electronic submission of the above request. (7) Existing law requires the colony strength of a bee colony to be certified after inspection on the basis of the number of active frames of bees or the square inches of brood per colony, or both, using a sampling system, approved by the secretary. This bill would instead require the colony strength of a bee colony to be certified after inspection on the basis of the number of active frames of bees per colony, as determined by either cluster count, frame count, or both, or another method approved by the secretary. (8) Existing law authorizes the secretary, or the county agricultural commissioner, or any inspector acting under their direction, to enter, if they determine it to be necessary, any location where an apiary is maintained, and make an inspection of the apiary, including ancillary buildings, as specified. Existing law authorizes the inspector to give prior notice of the inspection where the notice would not interfere with the purpose of the inspection. This bill would instead require the inspector to give notice of the inspection where the notice would not interfere with the purpose of the inspection. The bill would provide that, to the greatest extent possible, the beekeeper or their representative may be present for an internal inspection of the hives. The bill would require an inspector to use appropriate sanitation protocols, as described, during an inspection. (9) Existing law prescribes various abatement methods for diseased colonies. This bill would authorize operations to abate diseased colonies to be performed by any authorized hazardous waste facility. The bill would apply the above prescribed abatement methods to hazardous waste disposal. (10) Existing law, in lieu of prosecution, and in addition to any other specified penalty, authorizes the secretary or the county agricultural commissioner to impose an administrative civil penalty on a person who violates specified provisions of law relating to apiary registration and identification and intrastate movement of bee colonies. This bill would apply the above provision to violations of law relating to, among other things, nonconforming honey and mislabeling. (11) Existing law authorizes the secretary, in cooperation with the Regents of the University of California, to approve programs statewide to train, on a voluntary basis, beekeepers in the maintenance of colonies free of Africanized honey bees. This bill would instead authorize the secretary, in consultation with the board, to approve programs statewide to train, on a voluntary basis, beekeepers, inspectors, or county agricultural commissioners in contemporary and geographically relevant colony management, including, but not limited to, the maintenance of colonies free from Africanized honey bees. (12) This bill would also make other conforming and related changes and nonsubstantive changes. (13) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/28/22 - Chaptered Current pdf September 28, 2022
- Enrolled 09/02/22 - Enrolled pdf September 02, 2022
- Amended 08/24/22 - Amended Senate pdf August 24, 2022
- Amended 08/17/22 - Amended Senate pdf August 17, 2022
- Amended 08/26/21 - Amended Senate pdf August 26, 2021
- Amended 06/22/21 - Amended Senate pdf June 22, 2021
- Amended 05/24/21 - Amended Assembly pdf May 24, 2021
- Amended 04/22/21 - Amended Assembly pdf April 22, 2021
- Amended 03/30/21 - Amended Assembly pdf March 30, 2021
- Introduced 02/16/21 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2021
- AB719 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 683, Statutes of 2022.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 5367.).
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
From inactive file.
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Eggman.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 26).
-
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1771.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 20).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1460.)
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Agriculture · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Agriculture
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Alvarez, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Haney, Matt | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| McKinnor, Tina | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 27 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Carrillo, Juan | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Carrillo, Juan | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 719 do?
- (1) Existing law creates the Apiary Board within the Department of Food and Agriculture. Existing law requires the board to consist of 5 members that are appointed by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture. Existing law requires those members to be assessment-paying beekeepers that reside in California and represent the major geographical divisions of the beekeeping industry. Existing law authorizes the secretary to appoint an additional member on the board as a public member. This bill would increase the number of board members from 5 to 7. The bill would require 6 of the 7 board members to be registered beekeepers that reside in California and are representative of the industry functions of queen breeding, pollination, or honey production. The bill would authorize the secretary to appoint the 7th member of the board, who shall be a public member. The bill would authorize the secretary, in consultation with the board, to identify a representative from the California Agricultural Commissioners and Sealers Association and a member of the industry that represents pollinated crops to serve as subject matter experts at board meetings. (2) Existing law, for purposes of the Apiary Protection Act, defines "pest" to mean American foulbrood or any other infectious disease, parasite, pest, or hereditary disease that affects bees that the secretary declares by regulations is detrimental to the welfare of the bee industry. This bill would revise the definition of "pest" to, among other things, require those regulations be done in consultation with the association representing the beekeeping industry and the board. The bill would also revise the definition of "infected," "infested," "contaminated," or "diseased." The bill would also revise the definition of "inspector." (3) Existing law, the Apiary Protection Act, requires an owner or a person in charge or possession of an apiary to comply with certain requirements, including to register the number of colonies in each apiary and the location of each apiary and to abate an infestation of an apiary upon finding an infestation to be present or receiving notice of an infestation. Under existing law, failure to comply with any requirement under the Apiary Protection Act is a crime. This bill would apply certain requirements under the Apiary Protection Act to brokers, which the bill would define as a person or entity that receives a monetary profit from the managing of beehives, hive equipment, or honey bees that they do not own, but have control of, through a private or public agreement between one or more parties. By extending certain requirements to brokers, the violation of which would be a crime, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law authorizes any person to transport any contaminated hive, together with its contents, or any contaminated comb, including any frame associated with it, to a suitable place for burning, or to a licensed wax salvage plant, as specified. This bill would instead authorize any person under the supervision of the local county agricultural commissioner to transport any contaminated hive, together with its contents, or any contaminated comb, including any frame associated with it, to a suitable place for burning or disposal, or to a licensed wax salvage plant, as specified. (5) Existing law provides that no person shall move or transport any bees, comb, appliances, or colonies within the state that are diseased, except as specified. Existing law authorizes the inspector, in a summary manner, to destroy where required, any and all diseased colonies, bees, combs, or hives that are unlawfully moved within the state wherever they may be found. This bill would instead apply the above provisions to colonies, bees, combs, appliances, or hives that contain pests. (6) Existing law requires a beekeeper to report to the agricultural commissioner of the county in which the beekeeper's apiary is located, on a form approved by the secretary, each location of apiaries for which notification of pesticide usage is sought. Existing law requires each request, except as specified, to be mailed within 72 hours before locating an apiary, where feasible, but in no event later than 72 hours after locating an apiary. This bill would authorize electronic submission of the above request. (7) Existing law requires the colony strength of a bee colony to be certified after inspection on the basis of the number of active frames of bees or the square inches of brood per colony, or both, using a sampling system, approved by the secretary. This bill would instead require the colony strength of a bee colony to be certified after inspection on the basis of the number of active frames of bees per colony, as determined by either cluster count, frame count, or both, or another method approved by the secretary. (8) Existing law authorizes the secretary, or the county agricultural commissioner, or any inspector acting under their direction, to enter, if they determine it to be necessary, any location where an apiary is maintained, and make an inspection of the apiary, including ancillary buildings, as specified. Existing law authorizes the inspector to give prior notice of the inspection where the notice would not interfere with the purpose of the inspection. This bill would instead require the inspector to give notice of the inspection where the notice would not interfere with the purpose of the inspection. The bill would provide that, to the greatest extent possible, the beekeeper or their representative may be present for an internal inspection of the hives. The bill would require an inspector to use appropriate sanitation protocols, as described, during an inspection. (9) Existing law prescribes various abatement methods for diseased colonies. This bill would authorize operations to abate diseased colonies to be performed by any authorized hazardous waste facility. The bill would apply the above prescribed abatement methods to hazardous waste disposal. (10) Existing law, in lieu of prosecution, and in addition to any other specified penalty, authorizes the secretary or the county agricultural commissioner to impose an administrative civil penalty on a person who violates specified provisions of law relating to apiary registration and identification and intrastate movement of bee colonies. This bill would apply the above provision to violations of law relating to, among other things, nonconforming honey and mislabeling. (11) Existing law authorizes the secretary, in cooperation with the Regents of the University of California, to approve programs statewide to train, on a voluntary basis, beekeepers in the maintenance of colonies free of Africanized honey bees. This bill would instead authorize the secretary, in consultation with the board, to approve programs statewide to train, on a voluntary basis, beekeepers, inspectors, or county agricultural commissioners in contemporary and geographically relevant colony management, including, but not limited to, the maintenance of colonies free from Africanized honey bees. (12) This bill would also make other conforming and related changes and nonsubstantive changes. (13) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 719?
- AB 719 is sponsored by Committee on Agriculture.
- What is the current status of AB 719?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 719?
- Track AB 719 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 719
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 719
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →