California 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 823 — Public health: omnibus bill.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 554, Statutes of 2021.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 10, 2021. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Under existing law, a licensed health care provider who is authorized by law to prescribe an opioid antagonist may, if acting with reasonable care, prescribe and subsequently dispense or distribute an opioid antagonist to a person at risk of an opioid-related overdose or to a family member, friend, or other person in a position to assist a person at risk of an opioid-related overdose. Existing law defines "opioid antagonist" for this purpose to mean naloxone hydrochloride that is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of an opioid overdose. This bill would also include within the definition of "opioid antagonist" any other opioid antagonist that is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of an opioid overdose. Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health, subject to an appropriation in the Budget Act of 2016, to award funding to local health departments, local government agencies, or on a competitive basis to other organizations, as specified, to support or establish programs that provide naloxone to first responders and to at-risk opioid users through programs that serve at-risk drug users. This bill, in addition to naloxone, would include any other opioid antagonist that is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of an opioid overdose. (2) Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law establishes the Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud within the Office of the Attorney General. Existing law authorizes the bureau to conduct a statewide program for investigating and prosecuting, and referring for prosecution, any violation of law relating to fraud in the administration of the Medi-Cal program, the provision of medical assistance or medical supplies, or the activities of providers of medical assistance or medical suppliers under the Medi-Cal state plan. Existing law provides that the investigation of fraud by beneficiaries of the Medi-Cal program is the responsibility of the Audits and Investigations Branch of the department. This bill would rename the Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud as the Division of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse, and would make various conforming changes in this regard. (3) Existing federal law establishes the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) , which provides specified services for older individuals at a PACE center so that they may continue living in the community. Federal law authorizes states to implement PACE as a Medicaid state option. Existing state law establishes the California Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE program) to provide community-based, risk-based, and capitated long-term care services as optional services under the state's Medi-Cal state plan. Existing law generally requires an adult day health care center or home health agency to be licensed by the State Department of Public Health, which is required to obtain a criminal record clearance for specified individuals who own or are employed by the adult day health care center or home health agency. Under existing law, an adult day health care center or a home health agency that has been approved by the State Department of Health Care Services to exclusively serve PACE participants is exempt from licensure by the State Department of Public Health. Existing law requires the State Department of Health Care Services to obtain a criminal record clearance for the administrator, program director, and fiscal officer of an adult day health care center before approving the center to exclusively serve PACE participants or individuals being assessed for the PACE program. Existing law requires each specified individual, in order to qualify for criminal record clearance, to submit electronic fingerprint images and related information required by the Department of Justice and to be responsible for any costs associated with transmitting the electronic fingerprint images. Existing law requires the fee to cover the department's processing costs, not including the costs associated with capturing or transmitting the fingerprint images and related information, not to exceed $32 per submission to the department. This bill would remove the $32 limit on the processing fee and would instead require the Department of Justice to charge a fee that is sufficient to cover the department's cost of processing the criminal record check. Under existing law, to qualify for approval as a home health agency that exclusively serves PACE participants or individuals being assessed for the PACE program, an owner or administrator of a home health agency is required to submit electronic fingerprint images, at the owner's or administrator's expense, to the Department of Justice for the furnishing of the owner's or administrator's criminal record to the State Department of Health Care Services. Existing law prohibits a facility from allowing a newly hired administrator, program director, or fiscal officer to have direct contact with clients or residents of the facility before completing the criminal record clearance process pursuant to these provisions. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to charge a fee that is sufficient to cover the department's cost of processing the criminal record check. This bill would instead require the above-described persons who own or are employed by a home health agency to be responsible for any costs associated with transmitting the electronic fingerprint images. The bill would require the fee to cover the department's processing costs, not including the costs associated with capturing or transmitting the fingerprint images and related information, not to exceed $32 per submission to the department. (4) This bill would incorporate the changes to Section 6276.14 of the Government Code proposed by this bill to Section 7930.135 of the Government Code, as proposed to be added by AB 473, to be operative, as specified, only if this bill and AB 473 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate the changes to Section 6276.30 of the Government Code proposed by this bill to Section 7930.170 of the Government Code, as proposed to be added by AB 473, to be operative, as specified, only if this bill and AB 473 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 15633.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 636 to be operative only if this bill and AB 636 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 554, Statutes of 2021.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2525.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 2816.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (August 19).

  11. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  13. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1062.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  16. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  17. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.

  18. Set for hearing May 3.

  19. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 795.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  21. Set for hearing April 14.

  22. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  23. From printer.

  24. Article IV Section 8(a) of the Constitution and Joint Rule 55 dispensed with February 22, 2021, suspending the 30 calendar day requirement.

  25. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Health · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Health

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 15 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 8000
Unaffiliated 6001
Republican 1101
Total 15102
% of votes cast 83%6%0%11%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Eggman — Yea
Min — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Newman — Yea
Wilk — Not Voting
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Rubio, Susan Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 22001
Democratic 12001
Republican 4000
Total 38002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Pan — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Min — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Newman — Yea
Eggman — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Not Voting
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 71 Yea · 0 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 39005
Democratic 24003
Republican 8001
Total 71009
% of votes cast 89%0%0%11%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Santiago — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wood — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ting — Yea
Low — Yea
Frazier — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Daly — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Smith — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gray — Not Voting
Levine — Not Voting
Bloom — Not Voting
Rendon — Not Voting
Voepel — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Not Voting
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Not Voting
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Not Voting
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Not Voting
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Not Voting
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 16 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12000
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 16000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Voepel — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chau — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 3000
Unaffiliated 11000
Republican 1000
Total 15000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Wood — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 23000
Democratic 10003
Republican 4000
Total 37003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Hertzberg — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Newman — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Pan — Yea
Bates — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Roth — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Min — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Not Voting
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Not Voting
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Not Voting
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 7000
Democratic 3000
Total 11000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Pan — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Roth — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 823 do?
(1) Under existing law, a licensed health care provider who is authorized by law to prescribe an opioid antagonist may, if acting with reasonable care, prescribe and subsequently dispense or distribute an opioid antagonist to a person at risk of an opioid-related overdose or to a family member, friend, or other person in a position to assist a person at risk of an opioid-related overdose. Existing law defines "opioid antagonist" for this purpose to mean naloxone hydrochloride that is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of an opioid overdose. This bill would also include within the definition of "opioid antagonist" any other opioid antagonist that is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of an opioid overdose. Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health, subject to an appropriation in the Budget Act of 2016, to award funding to local health departments, local government agencies, or on a competitive basis to other organizations, as specified, to support or establish programs that provide naloxone to first responders and to at-risk opioid users through programs that serve at-risk drug users. This bill, in addition to naloxone, would include any other opioid antagonist that is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of an opioid overdose. (2) Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law establishes the Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud within the Office of the Attorney General. Existing law authorizes the bureau to conduct a statewide program for investigating and prosecuting, and referring for prosecution, any violation of law relating to fraud in the administration of the Medi-Cal program, the provision of medical assistance or medical supplies, or the activities of providers of medical assistance or medical suppliers under the Medi-Cal state plan. Existing law provides that the investigation of fraud by beneficiaries of the Medi-Cal program is the responsibility of the Audits and Investigations Branch of the department. This bill would rename the Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud as the Division of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse, and would make various conforming changes in this regard. (3) Existing federal law establishes the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) , which provides specified services for older individuals at a PACE center so that they may continue living in the community. Federal law authorizes states to implement PACE as a Medicaid state option. Existing state law establishes the California Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE program) to provide community-based, risk-based, and capitated long-term care services as optional services under the state's Medi-Cal state plan. Existing law generally requires an adult day health care center or home health agency to be licensed by the State Department of Public Health, which is required to obtain a criminal record clearance for specified individuals who own or are employed by the adult day health care center or home health agency. Under existing law, an adult day health care center or a home health agency that has been approved by the State Department of Health Care Services to exclusively serve PACE participants is exempt from licensure by the State Department of Public Health. Existing law requires the State Department of Health Care Services to obtain a criminal record clearance for the administrator, program director, and fiscal officer of an adult day health care center before approving the center to exclusively serve PACE participants or individuals being assessed for the PACE program. Existing law requires each specified individual, in order to qualify for criminal record clearance, to submit electronic fingerprint images and related information required by the Department of Justice and to be responsible for any costs associated with transmitting the electronic fingerprint images. Existing law requires the fee to cover the department's processing costs, not including the costs associated with capturing or transmitting the fingerprint images and related information, not to exceed $32 per submission to the department. This bill would remove the $32 limit on the processing fee and would instead require the Department of Justice to charge a fee that is sufficient to cover the department's cost of processing the criminal record check. Under existing law, to qualify for approval as a home health agency that exclusively serves PACE participants or individuals being assessed for the PACE program, an owner or administrator of a home health agency is required to submit electronic fingerprint images, at the owner's or administrator's expense, to the Department of Justice for the furnishing of the owner's or administrator's criminal record to the State Department of Health Care Services. Existing law prohibits a facility from allowing a newly hired administrator, program director, or fiscal officer to have direct contact with clients or residents of the facility before completing the criminal record clearance process pursuant to these provisions. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to charge a fee that is sufficient to cover the department's cost of processing the criminal record check. This bill would instead require the above-described persons who own or are employed by a home health agency to be responsible for any costs associated with transmitting the electronic fingerprint images. The bill would require the fee to cover the department's processing costs, not including the costs associated with capturing or transmitting the fingerprint images and related information, not to exceed $32 per submission to the department. (4) This bill would incorporate the changes to Section 6276.14 of the Government Code proposed by this bill to Section 7930.135 of the Government Code, as proposed to be added by AB 473, to be operative, as specified, only if this bill and AB 473 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate the changes to Section 6276.30 of the Government Code proposed by this bill to Section 7930.170 of the Government Code, as proposed to be added by AB 473, to be operative, as specified, only if this bill and AB 473 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 15633.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 636 to be operative only if this bill and AB 636 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Who sponsors SB 823?
SB 823 is sponsored by Committee on Health.
What is the current status of SB 823?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 10, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 823?
Track SB 823 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 823

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 823

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →