AB 34 — Broadband for All Act of 2022.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Technology to improve the governance and implementation of information technology by standardizing reporting relationships, roles, and responsibilities for setting information technology priorities. Existing law requires the Public Utilities Commission to develop, implement, and administer the California Advanced Services Fund program to encourage deployment of high-quality advanced communications services to all Californians. Existing law provides that the goal of the program is to, no later than December 31, 2022, approve funding for infrastructure projects that will provide broadband access to no less than 98% of California households, as provided. This bill would enact the Broadband for All Act of 2022, which, if approved by the voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $10,000,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to support the 2022 Broadband for All Program that would be administered by the department for purposes of providing financial assistance for projects to deploy broadband infrastructure and broadband internet access services. The bill would provide for the submission of the bond act to the voters at the November 8, 2022, statewide general election.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/06/21 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 06, 2021
- Amended 03/16/21 - Amended Assembly pdf March 16, 2021
- Introduced 12/07/20 - Introduced pdf December 07, 2020
- AB34 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
-
Coauthors revised.
-
Re-referred to Com. on C. & C.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on C. & C. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on C. & C.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on C. & C. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on C. & C. and P. & C.P.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee January 7.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Al Muratsuchi · Primary
- Santiago · Cosponsor
- Mathis · Cosponsor
- Villapudua · Cosponsor
- Glazer · Cosponsor
- Ting · Cosponsor
- Wood · Cosponsor
- Holden · Cosponsor
- Sharon Quirk-Silva · Cosponsor
- Rodriguez · Cosponsor
- Juan Carrillo · Cosponsor
- Robert Garcia · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Muratsuchi, Al Democratic
Co-sponsors (11)
- Santiago
- Mathis
- Villapudua
- Glazer
- Ting
- Wood
- Holden
- Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic
- Rodriguez
- Carrillo, Juan Democratic
- Garcia, Robert Democratic
Not signed on (110)
110 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 110 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 18% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Carrillo, Juan | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 8% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Carrillo, Juan | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 34 do?
- Existing law requires the Department of Technology to improve the governance and implementation of information technology by standardizing reporting relationships, roles, and responsibilities for setting information technology priorities. Existing law requires the Public Utilities Commission to develop, implement, and administer the California Advanced Services Fund program to encourage deployment of high-quality advanced communications services to all Californians. Existing law provides that the goal of the program is to, no later than December 31, 2022, approve funding for infrastructure projects that will provide broadband access to no less than 98% of California households, as provided. This bill would enact the Broadband for All Act of 2022, which, if approved by the voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $10,000,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to support the 2022 Broadband for All Program that would be administered by the department for purposes of providing financial assistance for projects to deploy broadband infrastructure and broadband internet access services. The bill would provide for the submission of the bond act to the voters at the November 8, 2022, statewide general election.
- Who sponsors AB 34?
- AB 34 is sponsored by Muratsuchi, Al (Democratic), Santiago, Mathis, Villapudua, Glazer, Ting, Wood, Holden, Quirk-Silva, Sharon (Democratic), Rodriguez, Carrillo, Juan (Democratic), and Garcia, Robert (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 34?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 34?
- Track AB 34 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 34
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 34
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →