Members of boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs: per diem.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1498 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1498.
You're tracking AB 1498
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1498 — Members of boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs: per diem.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes various boards, as defined, within the Department of Consumer Affairs for the licensure and regulation of various professions and vocations. Existing law requires a member of certain boards to receive a per diem of $100 for each day actually spent in the discharge of official duties and to be reimbursed for traveling and other expenses necessarily incurred in the performance of official duties. Existing law requires payment to be made only from the fund from which the expenses of the board are paid and subject to availability of money in the fund. Existing law conditions receipt of these moneys on authorization in specified provisions, some of which authorize these expenditures from a continuously appropriated fund. This bill would recast those provisions to, instead, base the per diem of $100 on each day that the member discharged official duties, and would require the board to define "day that the member discharged official duties" as either the "accumulation of 8 hours spent in the discharge of official duties" or as a "day on which the member performed an official duty." By expanding the authorization for the use of moneys in a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would also make nonsubstantive, clarifying changes.
Bill Text
- Amended 01/03/22 - Amended Assembly Current pdf January 03, 2022
- Introduced 02/19/21 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2021
- AB1498 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (January 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on INS.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Low · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Low
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| Vince Fong | — | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1498 do?
- Existing law establishes various boards, as defined, within the Department of Consumer Affairs for the licensure and regulation of various professions and vocations. Existing law requires a member of certain boards to receive a per diem of $100 for each day actually spent in the discharge of official duties and to be reimbursed for traveling and other expenses necessarily incurred in the performance of official duties. Existing law requires payment to be made only from the fund from which the expenses of the board are paid and subject to availability of money in the fund. Existing law conditions receipt of these moneys on authorization in specified provisions, some of which authorize these expenditures from a continuously appropriated fund. This bill would recast those provisions to, instead, base the per diem of $100 on each day that the member discharged official duties, and would require the board to define "day that the member discharged official duties" as either the "accumulation of 8 hours spent in the discharge of official duties" or as a "day on which the member performed an official duty." By expanding the authorization for the use of moneys in a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would also make nonsubstantive, clarifying changes.
- Who sponsors AB 1498?
- AB 1498 is sponsored by Low.
- What is the current status of AB 1498?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1498?
- Track AB 1498 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1498
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1498
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →