Bar pilots: pilotage rates.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2056 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2056.
You're tracking AB 2056
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2056 — Bar pilots: pilotage rates.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 769, Statutes of 2022.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the regulation and licensing of pilots for Monterey Bay and the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun. Existing law also establishes, in the Transportation Agency, a Board of Pilot Commissioners for the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun (Board of Pilot Commissioners) and prescribes the membership, functions, and duties of the Board of Pilot Commissioners with regard to the licensure and regulation of bar pilots. Existing law prescribes the rates of bar pilotage required to be charged by pilots and paid by vessels inward and outward bound through those bays and requires the Board of Pilot Commissioners to recommend that the Legislature, by statute, adopt a schedule of pilotage rates providing fair and reasonable return to pilots engaged in movements other than bar pilotage. Existing law imposes a board operations surcharge of up to 7.5% of all pilotage charges, which is paid by pilots to the Board of Pilot Commissioners. Existing law also imposes, among other things, an incremental rate of additional mills per high gross registered ton as is necessary and authorized by the Board of Pilot Commissioners to recover a pilot's costs of obtaining new pilot boats and of funding design and engineering modifications. Existing law requires all moneys received by the Board of Pilot Commissioners to be paid into the State Treasury to the credit of the Board of Pilot Commissioners' Special Fund, moneys in which are continuously appropriated for the payment of the compensation and expenses of the Board of Pilot Commissioners and its officers and employees. This bill would revise and recast the pilot boat surcharge provisions, including specifying that the costs of obtaining new pilot boats includes preliminary design and engineering and the costs of repowering existing pilot boats or the acquisition of new pilot boats in order to meet the requirements of any rule governing the emissions of commercial harbor craft adopted by the State Air Resources Board. The bill would authorize the pilot boat surcharge to be collected prospectively before the imposition of certain costs, as prescribed. The bill would impose related requirements on the Board of Pilot Commissioners, including, among others, auditing or causing to be audited all pilot boat surcharges. The bill would authorize the Board of Pilot Commissioners to adjust the amount of the surcharge as necessary to efficiently administer the pilot boat surcharge. The bill would require the moneys charged and collected each month from the pilot boat surcharge to be paid to the Board of Pilot Commissioners' Special Fund and credited to the Pilot Boat Surcharge Account, which the bill would establish in the Board of Pilot Commissioners' Special Fund. The bill would continuously appropriate the moneys in the account to fund the pilot boat costs of obtaining new pilot boats and of funding design and engineering modifications for the purposes of extending the service life of existing pilot boats, excluding costs for repair or maintenance, and to cover the administrative costs of the Board of Pilot Commissioners with respect to administration of the account, as specified. By continuously appropriating moneys in the account, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would establish maximum expenditure levels at specified monetary amounts for the account based on fiscal year. The bill would increase the rates of bar pilotage required to be charged by pilots and paid by vessels inward and outward bound through those bays to a minimum of $3,000 on and after January 1, 2024, for each vessel piloted. The bill would also increase pilotage rates providing fair and reasonable return to pilots engaged in movements other than bar pilotage by 15% on January 1, 2023, except as otherwise established by the bill for certain types of ship movements, and would delete the requirement that the Board of Pilot Commissioners recommend a schedule of those pilotage rates to the Legislature. By increasing pilotage rates, which may thereby increase the amount of the board operations surcharge and the amount of moneys paid into the continuously appropriated Board of Pilot Commissioners' Special Fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would establish, in addition to other charges for pilotage, temporary transit charges at specified amounts for all vessels moved across the bar, with specified exceptions, and for all bay moves and river moves. The bill would make inoperative the temporary transit charges as of the date the Board of Pilot Commissioners publishes the first pilotage tariff pursuant to the bill, as described below. (2) Existing law requires the Board of Pilot Commissioners, from time to time, to review pilotage expenses and establish guidelines for the evaluation and application of these expenses regarding its recommendations for adjustments in rates. Existing law authorizes any party directly affected by pilotage rates established under that provision to petition the Board of Pilot Commissioners for a public hearing, as prescribed. This bill would repeal those provisions. The bill would require the Board of Pilot Commissioners, pursuant to prescribed procedures, to adopt, and cause to be published, a pilotage tariff that establishes fair, just, reasonable, and sufficient rates for the provision of a safe, competent, reliable, and efficient pilotage service. The bill would establish procedures to request a change in the established pilotage rates, including procedures for petitions, notice, comment, hearings and orders, and review. The bill would authorize the adopted pilotage tariff to include the reasonable costs for the setting of tariff rates of the Office of Administrative Hearings and would require those moneys to be paid into, and continuously appropriated from, the Board of Pilot Commissioners' Special Fund, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would provide that pilotage rates imposed pursuant to specified existing law are subject to adjustment under these provisions. Because an increase in pilotage rates may thereby increase the amount of the board operations surcharge and the amount of moneys paid into the continuously appropriated Board of Pilot Commissioners' Special Fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would require the Board of Pilot Commissioners, after the adoption of the first pilotage tariff, to convene a committee to review the effectiveness of the revised ratesetting process and to present and submit a related report to the Legislature, the Governor, and the Secretary of Transportation, as specified. (3) Under existing law, a pilot who is carried to sea against the pilot's will or unnecessarily detained on board a vessel, as provided, is entitled to receive $600 per day, plus expenses, from the owner, operator, or agents of the detaining vessel, or a higher amount as determined pursuant to existing law. This bill would instead specify that this amount, on and after January 1, 2023, is $5,000 per day plus expenses incurred in returning, subject to adjustment by the board. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/29/22 - Chaptered Current pdf September 29, 2022
- Enrolled 09/02/22 - Enrolled pdf September 02, 2022
- Amended 08/22/22 - Amended Senate pdf August 22, 2022
- Amended 08/02/22 - Amended Senate pdf August 02, 2022
- Amended 06/01/22 - Amended Senate pdf June 01, 2022
- Amended 03/11/22 - Amended Assembly pdf March 11, 2022
- Introduced 02/14/22 - Introduced pdf February 14, 2022
- AB2056 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 769, Statutes of 2022.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 69. Noes 0.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 11).
-
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 0. Page 4701.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (April 6).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Timothy S. Grayson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 31 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Total | 69 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Not Voting |
| Kiley | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Alvarez, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Haney, Matt | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| McKinnor, Tina | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Not Voting |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Not Voting |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Not Voting |
| Wilk | — | Not Voting |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 13% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Glazer | — | Not Voting |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 26 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Unaffiliated | 26 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 56 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 0% | 0% | 28% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Not Voting |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| Kiley | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| Ting | — | Not Voting |
| Low | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Smith | — | Not Voting |
| Cunningham | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Haney, Matt | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Not Voting |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Not Voting |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 6% | 0% | 31% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Not Voting |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 7% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Vince Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2056 do?
- (1) Existing law provides for the regulation and licensing of pilots for Monterey Bay and the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun. Existing law also establishes, in the Transportation Agency, a Board of Pilot Commissioners for the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun (Board of Pilot Commissioners) and prescribes the membership, functions, and duties of the Board of Pilot Commissioners with regard to the licensure and regulation of bar pilots. Existing law prescribes the rates of bar pilotage required to be charged by pilots and paid by vessels inward and outward bound through those bays and requires the Board of Pilot Commissioners to recommend that the Legislature, by statute, adopt a schedule of pilotage rates providing fair and reasonable return to pilots engaged in movements other than bar pilotage. Existing law imposes a board operations surcharge of up to 7.5% of all pilotage charges, which is paid by pilots to the Board of Pilot Commissioners. Existing law also imposes, among other things, an incremental rate of additional mills per high gross registered ton as is necessary and authorized by the Board of Pilot Commissioners to recover a pilot's costs of obtaining new pilot boats and of funding design and engineering modifications. Existing law requires all moneys received by the Board of Pilot Commissioners to be paid into the State Treasury to the credit of the Board of Pilot Commissioners' Special Fund, moneys in which are continuously appropriated for the payment of the compensation and expenses of the Board of Pilot Commissioners and its officers and employees. This bill would revise and recast the pilot boat surcharge provisions, including specifying that the costs of obtaining new pilot boats includes preliminary design and engineering and the costs of repowering existing pilot boats or the acquisition of new pilot boats in order to meet the requirements of any rule governing the emissions of commercial harbor craft adopted by the State Air Resources Board. The bill would authorize the pilot boat surcharge to be collected prospectively before the imposition of certain costs, as prescribed. The bill would impose related requirements on the Board of Pilot Commissioners, including, among others, auditing or causing to be audited all pilot boat surcharges. The bill would authorize the Board of Pilot Commissioners to adjust the amount of the surcharge as necessary to efficiently administer the pilot boat surcharge. The bill would require the moneys charged and collected each month from the pilot boat surcharge to be paid to the Board of Pilot Commissioners' Special Fund and credited to the Pilot Boat Surcharge Account, which the bill would establish in the Board of Pilot Commissioners' Special Fund. The bill would continuously appropriate the moneys in the account to fund the pilot boat costs of obtaining new pilot boats and of funding design and engineering modifications for the purposes of extending the service life of existing pilot boats, excluding costs for repair or maintenance, and to cover the administrative costs of the Board of Pilot Commissioners with respect to administration of the account, as specified. By continuously appropriating moneys in the account, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would establish maximum expenditure levels at specified monetary amounts for the account based on fiscal year. The bill would increase the rates of bar pilotage required to be charged by pilots and paid by vessels inward and outward bound through those bays to a minimum of $3,000 on and after January 1, 2024, for each vessel piloted. The bill would also increase pilotage rates providing fair and reasonable return to pilots engaged in movements other than bar pilotage by 15% on January 1, 2023, except as otherwise established by the bill for certain types of ship movements, and would delete the requirement that the Board of Pilot Commissioners recommend a schedule of those pilotage rates to the Legislature. By increasing pilotage rates, which may thereby increase the amount of the board operations surcharge and the amount of moneys paid into the continuously appropriated Board of Pilot Commissioners' Special Fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would establish, in addition to other charges for pilotage, temporary transit charges at specified amounts for all vessels moved across the bar, with specified exceptions, and for all bay moves and river moves. The bill would make inoperative the temporary transit charges as of the date the Board of Pilot Commissioners publishes the first pilotage tariff pursuant to the bill, as described below. (2) Existing law requires the Board of Pilot Commissioners, from time to time, to review pilotage expenses and establish guidelines for the evaluation and application of these expenses regarding its recommendations for adjustments in rates. Existing law authorizes any party directly affected by pilotage rates established under that provision to petition the Board of Pilot Commissioners for a public hearing, as prescribed. This bill would repeal those provisions. The bill would require the Board of Pilot Commissioners, pursuant to prescribed procedures, to adopt, and cause to be published, a pilotage tariff that establishes fair, just, reasonable, and sufficient rates for the provision of a safe, competent, reliable, and efficient pilotage service. The bill would establish procedures to request a change in the established pilotage rates, including procedures for petitions, notice, comment, hearings and orders, and review. The bill would authorize the adopted pilotage tariff to include the reasonable costs for the setting of tariff rates of the Office of Administrative Hearings and would require those moneys to be paid into, and continuously appropriated from, the Board of Pilot Commissioners' Special Fund, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would provide that pilotage rates imposed pursuant to specified existing law are subject to adjustment under these provisions. Because an increase in pilotage rates may thereby increase the amount of the board operations surcharge and the amount of moneys paid into the continuously appropriated Board of Pilot Commissioners' Special Fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would require the Board of Pilot Commissioners, after the adoption of the first pilotage tariff, to convene a committee to review the effectiveness of the revised ratesetting process and to present and submit a related report to the Legislature, the Governor, and the Secretary of Transportation, as specified. (3) Under existing law, a pilot who is carried to sea against the pilot's will or unnecessarily detained on board a vessel, as provided, is entitled to receive $600 per day, plus expenses, from the owner, operator, or agents of the detaining vessel, or a higher amount as determined pursuant to existing law. This bill would instead specify that this amount, on and after January 1, 2023, is $5,000 per day plus expenses incurred in returning, subject to adjustment by the board. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 2056?
- AB 2056 is sponsored by Grayson, Timothy S. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 2056?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2056?
- Track AB 2056 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2056
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2056
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →